Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add checksum mismtaches to sqlx-cli migrate info #1680

Merged

Conversation

lfn3
Copy link
Contributor

@lfn3 lfn3 commented Feb 5, 2022

This fixes #870

Tested this manually locally:
image

@abonander abonander merged commit 7fb54d3 into launchbadge:master Feb 16, 2022
@lfn3 lfn3 deleted the print-mismtached-checksum-in-info branch February 18, 2022 08:54
mdtusz added a commit to mdtusz/sqlx that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
When running `sqlx migrate info`, the applied migrations checksums are
compared against the checksums of the local migration files. While the
checksums of applied migrations are stored correctly in the database as
sha384sum values, the `migrate info` command was incorrectly comparing
these against the checksums of down-migrations in cases where reversible
migrations are being used (e.g. when migrations end in `.up.sql` and
`.down.sql`).

This fixes the issue by skipping over any migrations with the
`MigrationType::ReversibleDown` type, using the same idiom as is used
when running migrations (with `migrate run`).

Issue introduced in launchbadge#1680
Partially resolves launchbadge#1158
mdtusz added a commit to mdtusz/sqlx that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
When running `sqlx migrate info`, the applied migrations checksums are
compared against the checksums of the local migration files. While the
checksums of applied migrations are stored correctly in the database as
sha384sum values, the `migrate info` command was incorrectly comparing
these against the checksums of down-migrations in cases where reversible
migrations are being used (e.g. when migrations end in `.up.sql` and
`.down.sql`).

This fixes the issue by skipping over any migrations with the
`MigrationType::ReversibleDown` type, using the same idiom as is used
when running migrations (with `migrate run`).

Issue introduced in launchbadge#1680
Partially resolves launchbadge#1158
mdtusz added a commit to mdtusz/sqlx that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2022
When running `sqlx migrate info`, the applied migrations checksums are
compared against the checksums of the local migration files. While the
checksums of applied migrations are stored correctly in the database as
sha384sum values, the `migrate info` command was incorrectly comparing
these against the checksums of down-migrations in cases where reversible
migrations are being used (e.g. when migrations end in `.up.sql` and
`.down.sql`).

This fixes the issue by skipping over any migrations with the
`MigrationType::ReversibleDown` type, using the same idiom as is used
when running migrations (with `migrate run`).

Issue introduced in launchbadge#1680
Partially resolves launchbadge#1158
mdtusz added a commit to mdtusz/sqlx that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2022
When running `sqlx migrate info`, the applied migrations checksums are
compared against the checksums of the local migration files. While the
checksums of applied migrations are stored correctly in the database as
sha384sum values, the `migrate info` command was incorrectly comparing
these against the checksums of down-migrations in cases where reversible
migrations are being used (e.g. when migrations end in `.up.sql` and
`.down.sql`).

This fixes the issue by skipping over any migrations with the
`MigrationType::ReversibleDown` type, using the same idiom as is used
when running migrations (with `migrate run`).

Issue introduced in launchbadge#1680
Partially resolves launchbadge#1158
abonander pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2022
When running `sqlx migrate info`, the applied migrations checksums are
compared against the checksums of the local migration files. While the
checksums of applied migrations are stored correctly in the database as
sha384sum values, the `migrate info` command was incorrectly comparing
these against the checksums of down-migrations in cases where reversible
migrations are being used (e.g. when migrations end in `.up.sql` and
`.down.sql`).

This fixes the issue by skipping over any migrations with the
`MigrationType::ReversibleDown` type, using the same idiom as is used
when running migrations (with `migrate run`).

Issue introduced in #1680
Partially resolves #1158
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[cli] new feature: 'migrate info': warn about changed-after-installed migrations
2 participants