Skip to content

Conversation

keelerm84
Copy link
Member

@keelerm84 keelerm84 commented Aug 29, 2025

With the latest release, pyRFC3339 allows a more flexible format. Prior
versions required an explicit T separator before the time section even
though the spec allows for a space.

While we still support the older version of pyRFC3339, we only test against the latest version, and can safely update this invalid test.

Both of these are considered valid formats:

1970-01-01T00:00:02.500Z
1970-01-01 00:00:02.500Z

With the latest release, pyRFC3339 allows a more flexible format. Prior
versions required an explicit T separator before the time section even
though the spec allows for a space.

Both of these are considered valid formats:

    1970-01-01T00:00:02.500Z
    1970-01-01 00:00:02.500Z
@keelerm84 keelerm84 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2025 18:32
@keelerm84 keelerm84 changed the title fix: Bump pyRFC3339 >=1.0 -> >=2.1.0 chore: Fix invalid unit test Aug 29, 2025
@keelerm84 keelerm84 merged commit 61b71b2 into main Aug 29, 2025
50 of 54 checks passed
@keelerm84 keelerm84 deleted the mk/sdk-1444/bump-3339 branch August 29, 2025 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants