Dynamic mixin calling

[Anahkiasen]

Not much to say, I just think it would be a good idea if in LESS you could do the following :

.blue { color: blue }
.red { color: red }

.color(@color) {
   .@{color}
}

div {
   .color(red)
}

Resulting in

div { color: red }

.@{variable} is a proposition of syntax but .@variable, .{variable} or .{@variable} would maybe fit better the LESS syntax, I don't know.

[Defavlt]

@blue: blue;
@red: red;

.color (@color) {
    color: @@color;
}

div {
    .color(red);
}

Resulting in

div {
    color: red;
}

Could be a substitution?

[lukeapage]

this can be achieved with mixin guards.. you would have .color when @color = red etc.

[edit - example corrected]

[Soviut]

guards use when not where, just a mild correction in case someone decides to cut and paste.