You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The draft ACME protocol has removed unauthenticated GET requests to order, authorization, and challenge resources. Because this is not a backwards compatible change we're intending to roll out support gradually before removing support for GETs to these resources entirely.
We need to:
Update wfe2/verify.go with support for verifying POST-as-GET requests
Add optional support for POST-as-GET to orders
Add optional support for POST-as-GET to authorizations
Add optional support for POST-as-GET to challenges
Add optional support for POST-as-GET to order certificate URLs
Add optional support for POST-as-GET to accounts
On November 1st, 2019 we will remove support for GET requests to orders, authorizations and challenges making POST-as-GET mandatory. When we do this we'll need to take care that you can't access any V2 resources via the V1 endpoint.
Do I assume correctly that the account change from {} to POST-as-GET will also be mandatory on the Nov. 1st, 2019 cutoff? But until then, it will support both?
This allows POST-as-GET requests to Orders, Authorizations, Challenges, Certificates and Accounts. Legacy GET support remains for Orders, Authorizations, Challenges and Certificates. Legacy "POST {}" support for Accounts remains.
Resolves#3871
The draft ACME protocol has removed unauthenticated GET requests to order, authorization, and challenge resources. Because this is not a backwards compatible change we're intending to roll out support gradually before removing support for GETs to these resources entirely.
We need to:
wfe2/verify.go
with support for verifying POST-as-GET requestsOn November 1st, 2019 we will remove support for GET requests to orders, authorizations and challenges making POST-as-GET mandatory. When we do this we'll need to take care that you can't access any V2 resources via the V1 endpoint.
Client developers that want a head-start testing their clients against this change are encouraged to use Pebble, which has already implemented the change for
-strict
mode.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: