Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

publicsuffix: update table to latest list from publicsuffix.org on 2016-05-26 #12

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yookoala
Copy link

Update to the publicsuffix/list@b13ac4c

Allowing quite a large amount of public suffix domains (like noip.com) users to overcome the rate limit problem (certbot/certbot#1607).

@yookoala
Copy link
Author

According to @bradfitz in golang/net#15518, they have no intention to keep re-generating their publicsuffix frequently. That means if letsencrypt is using the exact version of publicsuffix in golang/net, it will almost never be updated.

That creates the necessity to update the publicsuffix locally.

@yookoala yookoala changed the title publicsuffix: Update publicsuffix to latest public_suffix_list.dat publicsuffix: update table to latest list from publicsuffix.org on 2016-05-26 May 26, 2016
@cpu
Copy link

cpu commented May 27, 2016

Hi @yookoala, thanks for the PR.

In the near future we will be removing this golang/net fork entirely and migrating to using @weppos' publixsuffix-go package. This should help address the upstream Golang net package's PSL generation schedule and give us more flexibility moving forward. We will have the opportunity to update the PSL boulder uses at that point.

@cpu cpu closed this May 27, 2016
@yookoala
Copy link
Author

@ccppuu I created this PR for a very practical and urgent purpose. I uses quite a lot of noip.com based domain. And these domain are not supported by letsencrypt because of the rate limit issue, which depends on publicsuffix update. I really want to use SSL encryption for my sites.

Is there any roadmap for the publixsuffix-go patch for the boulder package? What can I do to speed this up?

@kaefert
Copy link

kaefert commented May 29, 2016

A lot of no-ip users have waited for half a year for the chance to get to use letsencrypt to secure their servers that don't have bought domains.

@ccppuu Would it be a lot of effort to merge and deploy this PR into the letsencrypt production environment? If not, would you consider doing this additional work for a quick relief for us long waiting wanna-be letsencrypt users?

Else, could you give us a timeline / roadmap of the alternative as @yookoala asked? Please forgive my ignorance, I only have a very rough understanding of the letsencrypt system.

@jsha
Copy link
Collaborator

jsha commented May 31, 2016

@kaefert @yookoala: Give us a couple more weeks. If we can't land the "nice" solution by then, we'll talk about fetching the latest PSL directly into this fork.

Thanks,
Jacob

@kaefert
Copy link

kaefert commented May 31, 2016

thanks jsha for the response and for the roadmap :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants