Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: derive Staged*Cul highlight correctly #1098

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

fix: derive Staged*Cul highlight correctly #1098

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

bluz71
Copy link
Contributor

@bluz71 bluz71 commented Jul 25, 2024

The GitSignsStagedTopdeleteCul highlight (especially the foreground) was very hard to read. It seems the issue was that GitSignsStagedTopdeleteCul incorrectly derived from GitSignsStagedDeleteCul instead of the expected GitSignsTopdeleteCul.

So I think the fg_factor ended up being 0.5 of 0.5 equals 0.25, foreground extremely dim.

Likely just a simply cut-and-paste oversight.

With this change the dim problem goes away.

The GitSignsStagedTopdeleteCul highlight (especially the foreground) was
very hard to read. It seems the issue was that
GitSignsStagedTopdeleteCul incorrectly derived from
GitSignsStagedChangeCul instead of the expected GitSignsChangedeleteCul.

So I think the fg_factor ended up being 0.5 of 0.5 equals .25,
foreground extremely dim.

Likely just a simply cut-and-paste oversight.

With this change the dim problem goes away.
@lewis6991 lewis6991 merged commit 1d2cb56 into lewis6991:main Jul 25, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants