-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decide which functional/e2e test framework to use #38
Comments
For future ref: https://jestjs.io/docs/en/puppeteer |
To answer my own question above, yes, Jest can easily be used together with playwright or puppeteer. I have stumbled upon a different blocker preventing me from using playwright or puppeteer. I need them to connect to Path forward: I must avoid spending more time in that rabbit hole and keep the project on track. Here's my plan:
Will you keep you posted :) |
Took a few minutes to contribute back to Mozilla and update their docs -- took me a good a while to find that option which was not on their official docs: mozilla/extension-workshop#649 |
Turns out we also can't use Path foward: keep doing manual tests + screenshots on every PR for now. Implement those basic DOM testing steps with playwright/puppetter whenever the issues highlighted in my previous commented get unblocked. |
Another small PR to Mozilla: mozilla/web-ext#1933 |
See #6
Jest will be used for unit testing. Later on we need to investigate if Jest can be a driver for playwright and the e2e tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: