Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ACPL -> win% #1494

Closed
ornicar opened this issue Jan 20, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

ACPL -> win% #1494

ornicar opened this issue Jan 20, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@ornicar
Copy link
Collaborator

ornicar commented Jan 20, 2016

http://chesscomputer.tumblr.com/post/98632536555/using-the-stockfish-position-evaluation-score-to
@ornicar ornicar closed this as completed in 4569835 Mar 6, 2016
ornicar added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 6, 2016
@ornicar
Merge pull request #1689 from ddugovic/win-rate-annotation
48741d9 
Resolve #1494 using win rate-based annotation
@ornicar ornicar reopened this Mar 7, 2016
@ornicar ornicar closed this as completed in fe032f8 Mar 7, 2016
@ornicar ornicar reopened this Mar 7, 2016
ornicar added a commit that referenced this issue May 12, 2016
@ornicar
Merge branch 'master' into tree-parts
e937dad 
* master:
  secure embedded JS
  reduce JSON size a little
  fix analysis ceval gauge
  Resolve #1494 using winning odds eval gauge
  fixes #1874
  don't show studies to everyone yet
  ta "தமிழ்" translation #16484. Author: V1chess.
@ddugovic
Copy link
Contributor

ddugovic commented Jun 22, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Please review: I like how the graph scales, yet I imagine the tooltip could be simplified.

EDIT: Shoot, this formula needs improvement (to consider TC and/or rating).

@ddugovic ddugovic mentioned this issue Apr 25, 2018
Closed
@movabo movabo mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2019
Closed
@ddugovic ddugovic mentioned this issue Jul 3, 2020
Closed
@yuzisee yuzisee mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ornicar @ddugovic