remove unused testnet entries from foundry.toml #957
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
foundry.toml (1)
Consider using dedicated API keys for each network instead of reusing MAINNET_ETHERSCAN_API_KEY
Reusing the same API key across multiple networks (22 networks currently use MAINNET_ETHERSCAN_API_KEY) poses several risks:
- Rate limiting could affect multiple networks simultaneously
- If compromised, attacker gains access to multiple networks
- Different networks might have different API requirements
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
74-124: Verify Etherscan API key configuration.Let's ensure all required API keys are properly configured:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all Etherscan API keys are configured in the CI/CD environment # Extract all API key environment variables echo "Checking Etherscan API keys..." grep -o '[A-Z]*_ETHERSCAN_API_KEY' foundry.toml | sort -u | while read -r var; do if [[ -z "${!var}" ]]; then echo "❌ Missing: $var" else echo "✅ Found: $var" fi doneLength of output: 1888
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
foundry.toml (1)
Line range hint
31-70: Consider sorting RPC endpoints alphabetically.For better maintainability and easier navigation, consider sorting the RPC endpoints alphabetically.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
foundry.toml(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
- GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: generate-tag
- GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (3)
foundry.toml (3)
Line range hint
74-124: Review the reuse of MAINNET_ETHERSCAN_API_KEY across multiple networks.Several networks are configured to use the mainnet Etherscan API key. While this might work, consider:
- Rate limiting implications when sharing the same API key
- Security implications if the key has broader permissions than necessary
- Potential issues if networks require different API key permissions
Consider using network-specific API keys where appropriate.
71-71: Successfully removed unused testnet entries.The removal of unused testnet entries (goerli, bsc-testnet, mumbai) while retaining localanvil for local development aligns well with the PR objectives.
Line range hint
31-70: PR scope expanded beyond removing testnets.While the PR objective was to remove unused testnet entries, it also adds numerous mainnet RPC endpoints. Please clarify if this expansion was intentional.
Let's verify that all the new environment variables are properly configured:
✅ Verification successful
Environment configuration is properly documented and supported
The PR changes are consistent with the
.env.examplefile, which provides default public RPC URLs for all the new mainnet networks. While our initial check showed missing environment variables, this is expected in the sandbox environment. The documentation inDeploy.mdand.env.exampleprovides clear guidance for setting up these variables in actual deployment environments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all ETH_NODE_URI environment variables are configured in the CI/CD environment # and verify they are valid URLs # Extract all environment variable names from foundry.toml echo "Checking environment variables..." grep -o 'ETH_NODE_URI_[A-Z]*' foundry.toml | sort -u | while read -r var; do # Check if variable exists in environment if [[ -z "${!var}" ]]; then echo "❌ Missing: $var" else # Validate URL format (basic check) if [[ "${!var}" =~ ^(http|https):// ]]; then echo "✅ Valid: $var" else echo "⚠️ Invalid URL format: $var" fi fi doneLength of output: 4424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for environment variable documentation echo "Checking for environment setup documentation..." fd -t f -e md -e env -e example --exec grep -l -i "ETH_NODE_URI" {} \; # Check for example environment files echo -e "\nChecking for example environment files..." fd -g "*.env*" -g "env.*"Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "=== Contents of docs/Deploy.md ===" cat docs/Deploy.md echo -e "\n=== Contents of .env.example ===" cat .env.exampleLength of output: 8543
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
foundry.toml (1)
Environment variables are properly configured but need cleanup
The RPC endpoints in foundry.toml are properly documented in
.env.examplewith default values. However, there's an inconsistency:
.env.examplestill contains removed testnet endpoints (goerli, sepolia, mumbai, bsctest, lineatest, zksync_goerli)- Consider removing these testnet entries from
.env.exampleto maintain consistency with foundry.toml🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
31-70: LGTM! New mainnet RPC endpoints follow consistent naming pattern.The additions expand mainnet support while maintaining consistent environment variable naming convention.
Let's verify that all new environment variables are properly configured:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all RPC environment variables are defined in the CI environment # Extract all ETH_NODE_URI environment variables rg 'ETH_NODE_URI_[A-Z]+' foundry.toml | cut -d'"' -f2 | sort > /tmp/required_vars.txt # Check if each variable is defined while IFS= read -r var; do if ! printenv "$var" > /dev/null; then echo "Warning: $var is not defined" fi done < /tmp/required_vars.txtLength of output: 11253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for environment setup documentation or configuration echo "=== Checking for environment setup files ===" fd -t f -e yml -e yaml -e env -e md echo -e "\n=== Checking README for environment setup instructions ===" if [ -f "README.md" ]; then rg -i "environment|env|rpc|node.*uri" README.md fi echo -e "\n=== Checking for .env.example or similar files ===" fd -t f -g "*env*"Length of output: 2119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check .env.example for RPC endpoint documentation echo "=== Checking .env.example for RPC endpoints ===" rg "ETH_NODE_URI_" .env.example echo -e "\n=== Checking for any comments or instructions ===" rg "^#.*ETH_NODE_URI" .env.exampleLength of output: 3474
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
foundry.toml (1)
71-71: Remove unnecessary empty line.The empty line at line 71 creates unnecessary whitespace.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
foundry.toml(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
- GitHub Check: generate-tag
- GitHub Check: analyze
🔇 Additional comments (1)
foundry.toml (1)
Line range hint
74-127: LGTM! Etherscan configurations are properly structured.The configurations include appropriate API keys, URLs, chain IDs, and verifier types where needed.
Let's verify that all Etherscan API key environment variables are properly configured:
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 78.66% (2238 / 2845 lines) |
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)