Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: added GTPU to the interface type guessing function #1568

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2019

Conversation

mtirpak
Copy link
Contributor

@mtirpak mtirpak commented Nov 21, 2019

  • Fixed the type guessing for GTPU tunnels.
  • Added an extra nil check to the GTPU tunnel add and del functions
    to avoid problems with older VPP releases that still have a broken get
    api.

- Fixed the type guessing for GTPU tunnels.
- Added an extra nil check to the GTPU tunnel add and del functions
to avoid problems with older VPP releases that still have a broken get
api.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1568 into dev will increase coverage by 2.46%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1568      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.89%   55.35%   +2.46%     
==========================================
  Files         656      357     -299     
  Lines       78769    30539   -48230     
==========================================
- Hits        41662    16904   -24758     
+ Misses      34588    12310   -22278     
+ Partials     2519     1325    -1194
Flag Coverage Δ
#e2e ?
#unittests 55.35% <100%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

The GTPU tunnel info can be nil with an old VPP version that
has a broken get gtpu tunnel api.
@ondrej-fabry ondrej-fabry merged commit 77ece78 into ligato:dev Nov 21, 2019
@mtirpak mtirpak deleted the gtpu_interface_guess branch November 22, 2019 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants