This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
Removed duplicated doc in 'installing-cloudflow' page #966
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…stration/installing-cloudflow.html)
|
Hi @leozilla, Thank you for your contribution! We really value the time you've taken to put this together. Before we proceed with reviewing this pull request, please sign the Lightbend Contributors License Agreement: |
|
cc. @rstento for review |
rstento
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2021
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Affected doc page
docs/xxx/administration/installing-cloudflow.htmlWhat changes were proposed in this pull request?
Duplicated documentation was removed.
Why are the changes needed?
Duplicated documentation is obviously unnecessary and confusing for the reader.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, but its only a documentation change.
How was this patch tested?
It was tested by generating the doc locally and inspecting the page. In the local env the page did not contain any duplication anymore.