-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option_zero_reserve
(FEATURE 64/65)
#1140
Open
t-bast
wants to merge
1
commit into
lightning:master
Choose a base branch
from
t-bast:zero-reserve
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Lightning channels require nodes to lock some of their channel funds into a channel reserve, which cannot be used for payments made on that channel. This guarantees that both nodes always have an output in the commitment transaction, which they will lose if they publish a revoked commitment. While this requirement is generally useful, it creates inefficiencies since that liquidity can't be used to relay payments, and provides a bad user experience. In some settings, we may want to remove that channel reserve and allow nodes to use all of their channel funds. The `option_zero_reserve` feature lets nodes advertise that they allow their peers to disable the channel reserve on their side, and may lift the same requirement in response.
This was referenced Feb 16, 2024
21 tasks
21 tasks
21 tasks
22 tasks
25 tasks
23 tasks
23 tasks
22 tasks
23 tasks
22 tasks
23 tasks
21 tasks
20 tasks
This was referenced Sep 6, 2024
Any traction on this? Will this option work with already opened channels, or only affect the future ones? |
This is implemented on our side, this proposal is waiting for reviews and implementation by the other teams. |
20 tasks
19 tasks
19 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Lightning channels require nodes to lock some of their channel funds into a channel reserve, which cannot be used for payments made on that channel. This guarantees that both nodes always have an output in the commitment transaction, which they will lose if they publish a revoked commitment.
While this requirement is generally useful, it creates inefficiencies since that liquidity can't be used to relay payments, and provides a bad user experience. In some settings, we may want to remove that channel reserve and allow nodes to use all of their channel funds.
The
option_zero_reserve
feature lets nodes advertise that they allow their peers to disable the channel reserve on their side, and may lift the same requirement in response.This is an alternative to #1133