-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bolt4+proposals: fix max_cltv_expiry
calculation
#1176
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is meant by "the
max_cltv_expiry
she will communicate to the payer"? Does that mean through the invoice'spayinfo.cltv_expiry_delta
? If so, why is that a delta whilemax_cltv_expiry
is absolute? 🤔AFAICT, LDK doesn't include
min_final_cltv_expiry_delta
in the encrypted payload calculation, but does include it in what Alice communicates to the payer (i.e., inpayinfo.cltv_expiry_delta
), which seems like the opposite of what is stated here.@valentinewallace Could confirm / provide some insight here? You have a better understanding of this than I do. Background: #1174 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ That's all accurate from my understanding.
I tried to clarify this in the past via #1069, i.e the
max_cltv_expiry
should be conveyed via the invoice absolute expiry. But LDK doesn't do this lol, we just choose a very buffered absolute final CLTV expiry (2 weeks + latency grace period of 3 blocks). I think Elle's clarifications are still helpful as instructions for how to set a more minimal absolute expiry.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is my understanding right, though, that LDK doesn't include
min_final_cltv_expiry_delta
in the encrypted data calculation? That seems at odds with the change in the first commit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we don't need to explicitly include
min_final_cltv_expiry_delta
in our encrypted data calculation because we add so much buffer as mentioned above. Because senders only see the invoice expiry (2 hours), the final expiry that they set shouldn't come close to violating our min final delta which is relative to themax_cltv_expiry
(2 weeks). Does that make sense to you?