-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 420
More flexible fee rate estimates #2660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More flexible fee rate estimates #2660
Conversation
|
Tentatively setting 118, but if it doesnt make it it slips. |
73686c6
to
3e39bcc
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention:
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2660 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.04% 88.96% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 87229 87625 +396
Branches 87229 87625 +396
==========================================
+ Hits 77674 77954 +280
- Misses 7319 7430 +111
- Partials 2236 2241 +5
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
8257e6f
to
cbe6adf
Compare
cbe6adf
to
f0bd66c
Compare
Responded to @TheBlueMatt's review |
f0bd66c
to
fe1e9c4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think all these docs need a good bit more verbiage to make them more friendly to folks newer to lightning, I suggested some alternative text for a few of them.
0f11c17
to
8e45e78
Compare
8e45e78
to
2660c0b
Compare
2660c0b
to
a9ddda8
Compare
Added some more color around why the min channel fees are important for preventing force closures too |
a9ddda8
to
efa6d17
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I think we're getting there. Next time you squash can you line-wrap the lines to 100 chars? Other than that, need another reviewer.
efa6d17
to
bf012b6
Compare
let mut fee = updated_feerate * (predicted_weight as u64) / 1000; | ||
let sweep_feerate = fee_estimator.bounded_sat_per_1000_weight(ConfirmationTarget::OnChainSweep); | ||
let fee_rate = cmp::min(sweep_feerate, compute_feerate_sat_per_1000_weight(input_amounts / 2, predicted_weight as u64)) as u64; | ||
let fee = fee_rate * (predicted_weight as u64) / 1000; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can use fee_for_weight
here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using that breaks a test, it has an extra -1
in it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably because fee_for_weight
will round up. That test isn't very accurate to begin with because it's estimating the witness weight, which can be off by a few units.
bf012b6
to
a077093
Compare
Responded to @wpaulino's review, good catches |
a077093
to
6c7a827
Compare
6c7a827
to
e019bed
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, finally there from my end. Some remaining doc nits but I'm happy to land after this.
e019bed
to
5bb685a
Compare
CI is mad cause there's a test that was checking an error message:
|
5bb685a
to
9baac2f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy to clean up the docs in a followup.
9baac2f
to
dd15ab0
Compare
Closes #2659
My attempt at making fee rate estimation more flexible. Names and docs need some work (happy for suggestions).