Skip to content

Expose {prev,next}_user_channel_id fields in PaymentForwarded #2924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

tnull
Copy link
Contributor

@tnull tnull commented Mar 7, 2024

This is useful for users that track channels by user_channel_id.

For example, in lightning-liquidity we currently keep a full HashMap<ChanelId, u128> around just to be able to associate PaymentForwarded events with the channels otherwise tracked by user_channel_id.

(cc @wvanlint, @johncantrell97)

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Note

Reviews Paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the handling of payment forwarding within the Lightning Network's codebase, specifically by refining the PaymentForwarded event with additional fields for tracking user channel IDs. This change facilitates better tracking and management of payment paths. Adjustments are also made in the process of claiming funds and updating HTLC fulfillment to accommodate these enhancements, alongside updates in testing utilities to assert the correct behavior of the newly introduced parameters.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../src/events/mod.rs, .../src/ln/channelmanager.rs Updated PaymentForwarded event in Event enum with prev_user_channel_id and next_user_channel_id. Adjusted function signatures and logic in claim_funds_internal and internal_update_fulfill_htlc to handle new fields.
.../src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Enhanced expect_payment_forwarded function with parameters and assertions for prev_user_channel_id and next_user_channel_id.

🐇✨
In the realm of lightning, swift and bright,
Changes unfold, enhancing the flight.
Forwarding payments, from start to end,
With new fields added, on them we depend.
Through the network, the funds do hop,
With prev_user_channel_id and next, non-stop.
🌩️🐰💼

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-03-add-user-channel-id-to-payment-forwarded branch from 063595e to 42a69f2 Compare March 7, 2024 09:42
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a35bf8 and 063595e.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • lightning/src/events/mod.rs (4 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs (9 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs (2 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • (no review received)
Additional comments: 10
lightning/src/events/mod.rs (1)
  • 800-817: The addition of prev_user_channel_id and next_user_channel_id to the PaymentForwarded event is a significant enhancement for tracking payments and channels by user_channel_id. This change directly addresses the PR's objective to streamline the process of tracking payments and channels, thereby optimizing resource usage and simplifying the codebase for developers working on related functionalities.
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs (9)
  • 5736-5736: The addition of next_user_channel_id to the claim_funds_internal function signature is aligned with the PR's objectives. Ensure that this new parameter is integrated correctly throughout the system and that its usage is consistent with the intended tracking enhancements.
  • 5755-5755: Introduction of prev_user_channel_id is consistent with the PR's objectives of enhancing payment tracking. Verify its effective usage and ensure it does not introduce unintended side effects.
  • 5816-5816: Ensure that the conditional check involving prev_channel_id is correctly implemented and necessary for the intended enhancements.
  • 5842-5843: Augmentation of the PaymentForwarded event with prev_user_channel_id and next_user_channel_id aligns with the PR's objectives. Verify its impact on the event's usage across the system to ensure it contributes to the intended simplification and optimization.
  • 6821-6821: Introduction of next_user_channel_id in the internal_update_fulfill_htlc function is consistent with the PR's objectives. Verify its integration and usage within the function and related functionalities to ensure it does not disrupt existing processes.
  • 6851-6851: Assignment of next_user_channel_id within this conditional block is consistent with the PR's objectives. Verify its correct implementation and impact on related functionalities to ensure it does not introduce unintended side effects.
  • 6863-6863: The call to claim_funds_internal with next_user_channel_id as a parameter aligns with the PR's objectives. Verify its integration and impact on the system to ensure it contributes to the intended enhancements.
  • 7365-7365: The call to claim_funds_internal without next_user_channel_id in this context appears to be a specific case. Verify the justification for not including next_user_channel_id to ensure it aligns with the PR's objectives and does not introduce inconsistencies.
  • 11325-11325: The call to claim_funds_internal without next_user_channel_id in this context appears to be another specific case. Verify the justification for not including next_user_channel_id to ensure it aligns with the PR's objectives and does not introduce inconsistencies.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a35bf8 and 42a69f2.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • lightning/src/events/mod.rs (4 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs (9 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • lightning/src/events/mod.rs
  • lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
  • lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-03-add-user-channel-id-to-payment-forwarded branch from 42a69f2 to 7b6a355 Compare March 7, 2024 10:00
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Mar 7, 2024

@coderabbitai pause, now!

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2024

@tnull: Understood, pausing the automated reviews now.

Actions performed

Reviews paused.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.23077% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.03%. Comparing base (7a35bf8) to head (ab4b872).
Report is 55 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
lightning/src/events/mod.rs 86.66% 2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs 93.33% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2924      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.15%   90.03%   +0.87%     
==========================================
  Files         117      117              
  Lines       94868   100403    +5535     
  Branches    94868   100403    +5535     
==========================================
+ Hits        84584    90396    +5812     
+ Misses       7808     7560     -248     
+ Partials     2476     2447      -29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-03-add-user-channel-id-to-payment-forwarded branch from 7b6a355 to a062317 Compare March 7, 2024 10:35
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Mar 7, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@@ -7359,7 +7364,7 @@ where
log_trace!(logger, "Claiming HTLC with preimage {} from our monitor", preimage);
self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_update.source, preimage,
htlc_update.htlc_value_satoshis.map(|v| v * 1000), None, true,
false, counterparty_node_id, funding_outpoint, channel_id);
false, counterparty_node_id, funding_outpoint, channel_id, None);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would we consider including this field in MonitorEvents in the future so it can be available here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tnull tnull Mar 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thought about that too, but that might require starting to track it in the ChannelMonitors first, which might be a bit out-of-scope?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also currently don't have any concept of how to handle user channel ids after a channel closes - is recycling allowed at that point?

@@ -6857,7 +6862,7 @@ where
};
self.claim_funds_internal(htlc_source, msg.payment_preimage.clone(),
Some(forwarded_htlc_value), skimmed_fee_msat, false, false, Some(*counterparty_node_id),
funding_txo, msg.channel_id
funding_txo, msg.channel_id, Some(next_user_channel_id),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW, tests pass when I revert this change.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ugh, good catch. That's due to the map_or in the test which makes it too forgiving. I'll see to revisit that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now pushed a fixup to the test: #2924 (comment)

It's not perfect, but I wanted to avoid cluttering the macro by introducing yet another expected_X variable just for this slim use case. Let me know if you'd prefer it over the current approach though.

@tnull tnull dismissed stale reviews from valentinewallace and TheBlueMatt via d909a4e March 19, 2024 12:27
@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-03-add-user-channel-id-to-payment-forwarded branch from a062317 to d909a4e Compare March 19, 2024 12:27
tnull added 2 commits March 19, 2024 13:29
This is useful for users that track channels by `user_channel_id`.

For example, in `lightning-liquidity` we currently keep a full
`HashMap<ChanelId, u128>` around *just* to be able to associate
`PaymentForwarded` events with the channels otherwise tracked by
`user_channel_id`.
.. as it's the same as `prev_channel_id` defined a few lines above.
@tnull tnull force-pushed the 2024-03-add-user-channel-id-to-payment-forwarded branch from d909a4e to ab4b872 Compare March 19, 2024 12:29
@tnull
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnull commented Mar 19, 2024

Now pushed a minor fixup to the test:

> git diff-tree -U2  a062317  ab4b872
diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs
index 7319a28a0..0c8909b56 100644
--- a/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs
@@ -2250,9 +2250,20 @@ pub fn expect_payment_forwarded<CM: AChannelManager, H: NodeHolder<CM=CM>>(
                        // node's channel list
                        if !downstream_force_closed {
-                               assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x|
-                                       x.counterparty.node_id == next_node.node().get_our_node_id() &&
-                                       x.channel_id == next_channel_id.unwrap() &&
-                                       next_user_channel_id.map_or(true, |user_id| x.user_channel_id == user_id)
-                               ));
+                               // As documented, `next_user_channel_id` will only be `Some` if we didn't settle via an
+                               // onchain transaction, just as the `total_fee_earned_msat` field. Rather than
+                               // introducing yet another variable, we use the latter's state as a flag to detect
+                               // this and only check if it's `Some`.
+                               if total_fee_earned_msat.is_none() {
+                                       assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x|
+                                               x.counterparty.node_id == next_node.node().get_our_node_id() &&
+                                               x.channel_id == next_channel_id.unwrap()
+                                       ));
+                               } else {
+                                       assert!(node.node().list_channels().iter().any(|x|
+                                               x.counterparty.node_id == next_node.node().get_our_node_id() &&
+                                               x.channel_id == next_channel_id.unwrap() &&
+                                               x.user_channel_id == next_user_channel_id.unwrap()
+                                       ));
+                               }
                        }
                        assert_eq!(claim_from_onchain_tx, downstream_force_closed);

@valentinewallace valentinewallace merged commit a36b529 into lightningdevkit:main Mar 20, 2024
13 of 16 checks passed
k0k0ne pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
v0.0.123 - May 08, 2024 - "BOLT12 Dust Sweeping"

API Updates
===========

 * To reduce risk of force-closures and improve HTLC reliability the default
   dust exposure limit has been increased to
   `MaxDustHTLCExposure::FeeRateMultiplier(10_000)`. Users with existing
   channels might want to consider using
   `ChannelManager::update_channel_config` to apply the new default (lightningdevkit#3045).
 * `ChainMonitor::archive_fully_resolved_channel_monitors` is now provided to
   remove from memory `ChannelMonitor`s that have been fully resolved on-chain
   and are now not needed. It uses the new `Persist::archive_persisted_channel`
   to inform the storage layer that such a monitor should be archived (lightningdevkit#2964).
 * An `OutputSweeper` is now provided which will automatically sweep
   `SpendableOutputDescriptor`s, retrying until the sweep confirms (lightningdevkit#2825).
 * After initiating an outbound channel, a peer disconnection no longer results
   in immediate channel closure. Rather, if the peer is reconnected before the
   channel times out LDK will automatically retry opening it (lightningdevkit#2725).
 * `PaymentPurpose` now has separate variants for BOLT12 payments, which
   include fields from the `invoice_request` as well as the `OfferId` (lightningdevkit#2970).
 * `ChannelDetails` now includes a list of in-flight HTLCs (lightningdevkit#2442).
 * `Event::PaymentForwarded` now includes `skimmed_fee_msat` (lightningdevkit#2858).
 * The `hashbrown` dependency has been upgraded and the use of `ahash` as the
   no-std hash table hash function has been removed. As a consequence, LDK's
   `Hash{Map,Set}`s no longer feature several constructors when LDK is built
   with no-std; see the `util::hash_tables` module instead. On platforms that
   `getrandom` supports, setting the `possiblyrandom/getrandom` feature flag
   will ensure hash tables are resistant to HashDoS attacks, though the
   `possiblyrandom` crate should detect most common platforms (lightningdevkit#2810, lightningdevkit#2891).
 * `ChannelMonitor`-originated requests to the `ChannelSigner` can now fail and
   be retried using `ChannelMonitor::signer_unblocked` (lightningdevkit#2816).
 * `SpendableOutputDescriptor::to_psbt_input` now includes the `witness_script`
   where available as well as new proprietary data which can be used to
   re-derive some spending keys from the base key (lightningdevkit#2761, lightningdevkit#3004).
 * `OutPoint::to_channel_id` has been removed in favor of
   `ChannelId::v1_from_funding_outpoint` in preparation for v2 channels with a
   different `ChannelId` derivation scheme (lightningdevkit#2797).
 * `PeerManager::get_peer_node_ids` has been replaced with `list_peers` and
   `peer_by_node_id`, which provide more details (lightningdevkit#2905).
 * `Bolt11Invoice::get_payee_pub_key` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2909).
 * `Default[Message]Router` now take an `entropy_source` argument (lightningdevkit#2847).
 * `ClosureReason::HTLCsTimedOut` has been separated out from
   `ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed` as it is the most common case (lightningdevkit#2887).
 * `ClosureReason::CooperativeClosure` is now split into
   `{Counterparty,Locally}Initiated` variants (lightningdevkit#2863).
 * `Event::ChannelPending::channel_type` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2872).
 * `PaymentForwarded::{prev,next}_user_channel_id` are now provided (lightningdevkit#2924).
 * Channel init messages have been refactored towards V2 channels (lightningdevkit#2871).
 * `BumpTransactionEvent` now contains the channel and counterparty (lightningdevkit#2873).
 * `util::scid_utils` is now public, with some trivial utilities to examine
   short channel ids (lightningdevkit#2694).
 * `DirectedChannelInfo::{source,target}` are now public (lightningdevkit#2870).
 * Bounds in `lightning-background-processor` were simplified by using
   `AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2963).
 * The `Persist` impl for `KVStore` no longer requires `Sized`, allowing for
   the use of `dyn KVStore` as `Persist` (lightningdevkit#2883, lightningdevkit#2976).
 * `From<PaymentPreimage>` is now implemented for `PaymentHash` (lightningdevkit#2918).
 * `NodeId::from_slice` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2942).
 * `ChannelManager` deserialization may now fail with `DangerousValue` when
    LDK's persistence API was violated (lightningdevkit#2974).

Bug Fixes
=========

 * Excess fees on counterparty commitment transactions are now included in the
   dust exposure calculation. This lines behavior up with some cases where
   transaction fees can be burnt, making them effectively dust exposure (lightningdevkit#3045).
 * `Future`s used as an `std::...::Future` could grow in size unbounded if it
   was never woken. For those not using async persistence and using the async
   `lightning-background-processor`, this could cause a memory leak in the
   `ChainMonitor` (lightningdevkit#2894).
 * Inbound channel requests that fail in
   `ChannelManager::accept_inbound_channel` would previously have stalled from
   the peer's perspective as no `error` message was sent (lightningdevkit#2953).
 * Blinded path construction has been tuned to select paths more likely to
   succeed, improving BOLT12 payment reliability (lightningdevkit#2911, lightningdevkit#2912).
 * After a reorg, `lightning-transaction-sync` could have failed to follow a
   transaction that LDK needed information about (lightningdevkit#2946).
 * `RecipientOnionFields`' `custom_tlvs` are now propagated to recipients when
   paying with blinded paths (lightningdevkit#2975).
 * `Event::ChannelClosed` is now properly generated and peers are properly
   notified for all channels that as a part of a batch channel open fail to be
   funded (lightningdevkit#3029).
 * In cases where user event processing is substantially delayed such that we
   complete multiple round-trips with our peers before a `PaymentSent` event is
   handled and then restart without persisting the `ChannelManager` after having
   persisted a `ChannelMonitor[Update]`, on startup we may have `Err`d trying to
   deserialize the `ChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#3021).
 * If a peer has relatively high latency, `PeerManager` may have failed to
   establish a connection (lightningdevkit#2993).
 * `ChannelUpdate` messages broadcasted for our own channel closures are now
   slightly more robust (lightningdevkit#2731).
 * Deserializing malformed BOLT11 invoices may have resulted in an integer
   overflow panic in debug builds (lightningdevkit#3032).
 * In exceedingly rare cases (no cases of this are known), LDK may have created
   an invalid serialization for a `ChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2998).
 * Message processing latency handling BOLT12 payments has been reduced (lightningdevkit#2881).
 * Latency in processing `Event::SpendableOutputs` may be reduced (lightningdevkit#3033).

Node Compatibility
==================

 * LDK's blinded paths were inconsistent with other implementations in several
   ways, which have been addressed (lightningdevkit#2856, lightningdevkit#2936, lightningdevkit#2945).
 * LDK's messaging blinded paths now support the latest features which some
   nodes may begin relying on soon (lightningdevkit#2961).
 * LDK's BOLT12 structs have been updated to support some last-minute changes to
   the spec (lightningdevkit#3017, lightningdevkit#3018).
 * CLN v24.02 requires the `gossip_queries` feature for all peers, however LDK
   by default does not set it for those not using a `P2PGossipSync` (e.g. those
   using RGS). This change was reverted in CLN v24.02.2 however for now LDK
   always sets the `gossip_queries` feature. This change is expected to be
   reverted in a future LDK release (lightningdevkit#2959).

Security
========
0.0.123 fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability which we believe to be reachable
from untrusted input when parsing invalid BOLT11 invoices containing non-ASCII
characters.
 * BOLT11 invoices with non-ASCII characters in the human-readable-part may
   cause an out-of-bounds read attempt leading to a panic (lightningdevkit#3054). Note that all
   BOLT11 invoices containing non-ASCII characters are invalid.

In total, this release features 150 files changed, 19307 insertions, 6306
deletions in 360 commits since 0.0.121 from 17 authors, in alphabetical order:

 * Arik Sosman
 * Duncan Dean
 * Elias Rohrer
 * Evan Feenstra
 * Jeffrey Czyz
 * Keyue Bao
 * Matt Corallo
 * Orbital
 * Sergi Delgado Segura
 * Valentine Wallace
 * Willem Van Lint
 * Wilmer Paulino
 * benthecarman
 * jbesraa
 * olegkubrakov
 * optout
 * shaavan
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants