Skip to content

[0.0.122-bindings] Update 0.0.121 bindings branch to 0.0.122 #3013

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

No changes since 0.0.122 is all just internal changes anyway.

TheBlueMatt and others added 21 commits April 22, 2024 21:57
Because log `Record`s are now being passed by ownership to `log`,
the bindings get quite annoyed that there's a lifetime hanging
around. We already don't use this lifetime in bindings (the
`FormatArgs` is converted to a string and stored on the heap), so
we can just drop the lifetime, even though it requires some
macro'ing of the struct definition to do so.
There's not a lot of reason for downstream users to use the
`WithContext` wrapper, it mostly exists for our own downstream
crates anyway, and dealing with lifetimes in bindings isn't super
practical, so simply no-export it.
The bindings cannot express lifetimes, so exposing any field which
is a reference (and not `clone`-able, at least for garbage
collected language bindings) is unsafe for those expecting a
high-level interface.

Thus, we simply no-export the `RouteHopCandidate` inner struct
fields which are references (there are relevant accessors for them
anyway).
...as an arg to `Router`. Passing an `EntropySource` around all
the time is a bit strange as the `Router` may or may not actually
use it, and the `DefaultRouter` can just as easily store it.
The top-level module is only a few hundred lines, so there's not a
lot of reason to hide the `GraphSyncError` in its own module.
Instead, we simply move it to the top-level `lib.rs`, which doesn't
change the public API as it was previously re-exported at the top
level.
As it does the same thing as a derived `Debug` does anyway.
In 26c1639 (and later in
50c55dc) we switched to using
`Default::default()` to initialize `()` for scoring parameters in
tests. A number of `()`s slipped back in recently, which we replace
here.
While there's not really much harm in requiring a `Clone`able
reference (they almost always are), it does make our bindings
struggle a bit as they don't support multi-trait bounds (as it
would require synthesizing a new C trait, which the bindings don't
do automatically). Luckily, there's really no reason for it, and we
can just call the `DefaultMessageRouter` directly when we want to
route a message.
...as the bindings generation does not currently have the ability
to map a reference to a `NodeId` inside a tuple.
Bindings can't handle references in return types, so reduce the
visibility to pub(crate).
The bindings currently get confused by the implicit `Sign` type, so
we temporarily remove it on the `impl` here.
Re-exports in Rust make `use` statements a little shorter, but for
otherwise don't materially change a crate's API. Sadly, the C
bindings generator currently can't figure out re-exports, but it
also exports everything into one global namespace, so it doesn't
matter much anyway.
Having struct fields with references to other structs is tough in
our bindings logic, but even worse if the fields are in an enum.
Its simplest to just take the clone penalty here.
These really could be handled in the bindings, but for lack of
immediate users there's not a strong reason to, so instead we just
disable them for now.
The scorer currently relies on an associated type for the fee
parameters. This isn't supportable at all in bindings, and for
lack of a better option we simply hard-code the parameter for all
scorers  to `ProbabilisticScoringFeeParameters`.
These are not expressible in C/most languages, and thus must be
hidden.
Rather than `ChannelMonitor` only being clonable when the signer is
clonable, we require all signers to be clonable and then make all
`ChannelMonitor`s clonable.
`OnionMessageHandler`s are expected to regularly release a set of
nodes which we need to directly connect to to deliver onion
messages. In order to do so, they currently extend
`EventsProvider`, returning that set as `Event::ConnectionNeeded`s.

While this works fine in Rust, the `EventsProvider` interface
doesn't map well in bindings due to it taking a flexible trait impl
as a method argument.

Instead, here, we convert `OnionMessageHandler` to include a single
function which returns nodes in the form of a `node_id` and
`Vec<SocketAddress>`. This is a bit simpler, if less flexible, API,
and while largely equivalent, is easier to map in bindings.
As we cannot express slices without inner references in bindings
wrappers.
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt changed the base branch from main to 0.0.122-bindings April 22, 2024 21:59
If a user receives a payment preimage for an outbound payment, the
`PaymentSent` event will block any eventual RAA
`ChannelMonitorUpdate` from the same channel, assuming it comes in
before the event can be processed. If this blocking kicks in, but
the flow eventually completes with the RAA `ChannelMonitorUpdate`
being persisted, but the `ChannelManager` is only persisted prior
to the event being handled, on startup we'll have a fully
up-to-date `ChannelMonitor` but a pending, blocked
`ChannelMonitorUpdate`. When the `PaymentSent` event is replayed
we'll end up trying to apply a redundant `ChannelMonitorUpdate`
which will panic.

See the test added in this commit for an implementation of this
situation.

In this commit we fix this issue by simply dropping blocked
`ChannelMonitorUpdate`s the same as we do pending ones.
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Pushed a backport of #3021

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CI always fails on the bindings branch, we test in downstream languages.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit bdd0a57 into lightningdevkit:0.0.122-bindings Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants