LCORE-1343: fix grammar typos in e2e#1173
Merged
tisnik merged 1 commit intolightspeed-core:mainfrom Feb 18, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
WalkthroughThis PR updates end-to-end test documentation and feature files with textual corrections and expanded error scenarios. Changes include grammar improvements (e.g., "unreachable" to "is unreachable"), behavioral expectation rewording (e.g., "providing empty user_id" to "rejects empty user_id"), and addition of new error condition coverage (unknown model/provider, connectivity failures, conversation ID format issues). Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/e2e_scenarios.md`:
- Around line 122-124: There is a duplicate bullet "Check if LLM responds for
query request with error for missing query" in the e2e scenario list; remove the
redundant entry or replace it with the intended alternate scenario, updating the
bullet list in docs/e2e_scenarios.md so each test case is unique (look for the
exact duplicate string "Check if LLM responds for query request with error for
missing query" and delete or modify one occurrence to the correct scenario
description).
Comment on lines
+122
to
124
| * Check if LLM responds to sent question with error when attempting to access conversation with incorrect conversation ID format | ||
| * Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query | ||
| * Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate bullet entry for "missing query" scenario.
Lines 123 and 124 contain identical text. Line 123 appears to have been inserted as a new entry that already existed at line 124, leaving a duplicate.
🐛 Proposed fix
-* Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query
* Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| * Check if LLM responds to sent question with error when attempting to access conversation with incorrect conversation ID format | |
| * Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query | |
| * Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query | |
| * Check if LLM responds to sent question with error when attempting to access conversation with incorrect conversation ID format | |
| * Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/e2e_scenarios.md` around lines 122 - 124, There is a duplicate bullet
"Check if LLM responds for query request with error for missing query" in the
e2e scenario list; remove the redundant entry or replace it with the intended
alternate scenario, updating the bullet list in docs/e2e_scenarios.md so each
test case is unique (look for the exact duplicate string "Check if LLM responds
for query request with error for missing query" and delete or modify one
occurrence to the correct scenario description).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
LCORE-1343: fix grammar typos in e2e
Type of change
Tools used to create PR
Related Tickets & Documents
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Tests