-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
LCORE-973: config documentation, 1st version #828
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LCORE-973: config documentation, 1st version #828
Conversation
WalkthroughThree new documentation files introduce the Lightspeed Core Stack configuration schema across formats: a static HTML page, an OpenAPI v3.0 schema definition, and Markdown documentation. All three cover identical configuration sections (AccessRule, Authentication, Authorization, Database, JWT, CORS, and others) with field definitions, types, and descriptions. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20–30 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/config.json (2)
1-1054: AddmaxItemsconstraints to array fields for schema completeness.Several array fields lack
maxItemsconstraints, which can lead to unbounded configurations. This is flagged by Checkov (CKV_OPENAPI_21). While this is a "1st version" (as noted in the PR title), adding reasonable bounds to arrays likeactions,access_rules,mcp_servers,limiters, androle_ruleswould improve schema robustness.Consider adding
maxItemsto array definitions. For example:"actions": { "items": { "$ref": "#/components/schemas/Action" }, "title": "Actions", + "maxItems": 100, "type": "array" }
683-683: Minor: Fix description capitalization.The description "model context protocol server configuration" should be capitalized to match other descriptions in the schema.
- "description": "model context protocol server configuration.", + "description": "Model context protocol server configuration.",docs/config.md (1)
1-384: Populate field descriptions and complete type information.The Markdown documentation has well-structured tables but the "Description" column is uniformly empty across all sections, and type information is incomplete for complex types (showing blank instead of references or type names). For example:
- Line 39-42: Type columns show blank for k8s_cluster_api, k8s_ca_cert_path, jwk_config, and rh_identity_config
- Lines 21-27: Action section lists an enum but provides no table of available values
- Lines 185-192: JsonPathOperator similarly lacks enum values
This is acceptable for a "1st version" (as noted in the PR title), but consider enhancing descriptions with usage guidance and completing type references in future iterations.
docs/config.html (1)
7-7: Add meaningful page title and complete table content.Line 7 has an empty
<title>tag. Consider adding a descriptive title like "Lightspeed Core Stack Configuration Schema Documentation".Additionally, like the Markdown file, the HTML tables have empty "Description" columns and incomplete type information for complex fields. This mirrors the Markdown documentation gaps and should be addressed alongside Markdown improvements.
- <title> </title> + <title>Lightspeed Core Stack Configuration Schema Documentation</title>Also applies to: 174-1031
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/config.html(1 hunks)docs/config.json(1 hunks)docs/config.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: onmete
Repo: lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack PR: 417
File: src/lightspeed_stack.py:60-63
Timestamp: 2025-08-19T08:57:27.714Z
Learning: In the lightspeed-stack project, file permission hardening (chmod 0o600) for stored configuration JSON files is not required as it's not considered a security concern in their deployment environment.
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
docs/config.json
[high] 1-1054: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[medium] 17-23: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items
(CKV_OPENAPI_21)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: build-pr
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: e2e_tests (ci)
- GitHub Check: e2e_tests (azure)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/config.html (1)
5-5: Clarify whether HTML is auto-generated or manually maintained.The meta generator tag at Line 5 indicates this is "pandoc"-generated. If the HTML is auto-generated from the Markdown source (docs/config.md), maintainers should focus updates on the Markdown file and regenerate HTML. If manually maintained, ensure it stays synchronized with the Markdown and JSON schema versions.
Description
LCORE-973: config documentation, 1st version
Type of change
Related Tickets & Documents
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.