Skip to content

Conversation

@konard
Copy link
Member

@konard konard commented Sep 10, 2025

🎯 Problem Description

Fixes issue #26: Wrong simplified changes list on update operation.

The issue occurred when update operations were showing intermediate transformation steps instead of simplified changes. For example, when running:

dotnet run -- '((($index: $source $target)) (($index: $target $source)))' --changes --after

Instead of showing clean transformations like:

(1: 1 2) (1: 2 1)  
(2: 2 1) (2: 1 2)

It was showing intermediate steps:

((1: 1 2)) ()
((1: 1 2)) ((1: 2 1))  
((2: 2 1)) ((2: 1 2))

🔧 Root Cause Analysis

The problem was in the ChangesSimplifier algorithm. When a link had multiple conflicting transformations from the same "before" state (e.g., both deletion (1: 1 2) -> (0: 0 0) and direct update (1: 1 2) -> (1: 2 1)), the simplifier's chain-building logic would fail.

This occurred because:

  1. The same "before" state appeared in multiple transitions
  2. The algorithm couldn't determine which transformation was the actual final one
  3. All intermediate steps were returned instead of being simplified

✅ Solution

Added a preprocessing step RemoveDuplicateBeforeStates (C#) / remove_duplicate_before_states (Rust) that:

  • Identifies conflicting transitions: When the same "before" state has multiple "after" states
  • Handles null transitions intelligently: When one transition is to a null state (0: 0 0) and others are non-null, prefer the non-null transitions as they represent the actual final transformation
  • Preserves legitimate multiple branches: Maintains scenarios where one initial state legitimately leads to multiple different final states

🧪 Testing

C# Tests

  • ✅ All existing tests continue to pass (126 tests)
  • SimplifyChanges_Issue26_UpdateOperationSimplification reproduces and verifies the fix
  • SimplifyChanges_Issue26_AlternativeScenario_NoSimplificationOccurs tests the edge case

Rust Tests

  • ✅ All existing tests continue to pass (34 tests)
  • test_simplify_issue26_update_operation reproduces and verifies the fix
  • test_simplify_issue26_alternative_scenario tests the edge case
  • test_simplify_multiple_branches_from_same_initial tests legitimate branching
  • test_simplify_specific_example_removes_intermediate_states tests chain simplification
  • test_simplify_keeps_unchanged_states tests unchanged state preservation

🔍 Technical Details

Before the fix:

// These conflicting changes would cause the simplifier to fail:
(1: 1 2) -> (0: 0 0)    // deletion  
(1: 1 2) -> (1: 2 1)    // update
(2: 2 1) -> (2: 1 2)    // update
// Result: All 3 changes shown (no simplification)

After the fix:

// The preprocessing removes the conflicting null transition:
(1: 1 2) -> (1: 2 1)    // final transformation
(2: 2 1) -> (2: 1 2)    // final transformation  
// Result: Only 2 simplified changes shown

📋 Files Changed

C# (existing fix)

  • csharp/Foundation.Data.Doublets.Cli/ChangesSimplifier.cs: Core fix implementation
  • csharp/Foundation.Data.Doublets.Cli.Tests/ChangesSimplifier.cs: Test cases

Rust (new fix applied)

  • rust/src/changes_simplifier.rs: Core fix implementation + comprehensive test cases

🔄 Symmetry

Both C# and Rust implementations now have:

  1. Identical preprocessing logic (RemoveDuplicateBeforeStates / remove_duplicate_before_states)
  2. Same algorithm structure (separate unchanged states, identify initial/final states, DFS traversal)
  3. Matching test coverage for Issue Wrong simplified changes list on update operation #26 scenarios

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Resolves #26

Adding CLAUDE.md with task information for AI processing.
This file will be removed when the task is complete.

Issue: #26
@konard konard self-assigned this Sep 10, 2025
konard and others added 2 commits September 10, 2025 16:02
Fixed the issue where update operations were showing intermediate steps instead of simplified changes. The problem occurred when the same link had multiple conflicting transformations (e.g., deletion + update), causing the ChangesSimplifier to fail to properly identify transformation chains.

Key changes:
- Added RemoveDuplicateBeforeStates method to handle conflicting transformations from the same before state
- When a link has both null transition (0:0:0) and non-null transitions, prefer the non-null as the actual final state
- Preserves legitimate multiple-branch scenarios while fixing the specific Issue #26 case
- Added comprehensive test case to cover the problematic scenario
- Added debug output support in Program.cs for troubleshooting (enabled with --trace)

All 126 tests pass, including new test cases that verify the fix works correctly.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@konard konard changed the title [WIP] Wrong simplified changes list on update operation Fix simplified changes list on update operation Sep 10, 2025
@konard konard marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2025 13:35
@konard
Copy link
Member Author

konard commented Jan 8, 2026

Resolve conflicts and ensure all changes are correct, consistent and fully meet the requirements. Check our logic for simplicity and simmetry.

Make sure we add tests and apply fix for both C# and Rust logic.

@konard konard marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2026 03:37
@konard
Copy link
Member Author

konard commented Jan 8, 2026

🤖 AI Work Session Started

Starting automated work session at 2026-01-08T03:37:19.385Z

The PR has been converted to draft mode while work is in progress.

This comment marks the beginning of an AI work session. Please wait working session to finish, and provide your feedback.

konard and others added 2 commits January 8, 2026 04:38
- Added remove_duplicate_before_states() function to handle duplicate
  before states with conflicting transitions (null vs non-null)
- When a before state has both a null transition (0: 0 0) and non-null
  transitions, prefer the non-null transitions as they represent the
  actual final transformations
- Added comprehensive tests for Issue #26 scenarios:
  - test_simplify_issue26_update_operation
  - test_simplify_issue26_alternative_scenario
  - test_simplify_multiple_branches_from_same_initial
  - test_simplify_specific_example_removes_intermediate_states
  - test_simplify_keeps_unchanged_states
- Both C# and Rust implementations now have symmetric logic

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@konard konard marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 03:43
@konard
Copy link
Member Author

konard commented Jan 8, 2026

🤖 Solution Draft Log

This log file contains the complete execution trace of the AI solution draft process.

💰 Cost estimation:

  • Public pricing estimate: $2.990158 USD
  • Calculated by Anthropic: $1.949635 USD
  • Difference: $-1.040523 (-34.80%)
    📎 Log file uploaded as GitHub Gist (456KB)
    🔗 View complete solution draft log

Now working session is ended, feel free to review and add any feedback on the solution draft.

@konard konard merged commit 63c9274 into main Jan 8, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong simplified changes list on update operation

2 participants