-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
In load tests, it appears that jemalloc is--perhaps unsurprisingly--more efficient than the alternatives. Specifically, jemalloc uses less memory and is more responsive to memory being released without substantially impacting latency or CPU usage. This is only enabled on `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`, as this is the only platform on which all tests pass, etc (per [gnzlbg/jemallocator][readme]). [readme]: https://github.com/gnzlbg/jemallocator/tree/c27a859e98e3cb790dc269773d9da71a1e918458#platform-support
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
33 additions
and
22 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters