Optimize Vector operations with size-based performance thresholds #169
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR addresses issue #72 by implementing intelligent size-based optimizations for
System.Numerics.Vectoroperations in theBitStringclass.Key Finding
System.Numerics.Vector is NOT universally faster than regular instructions. Performance varies dramatically based on data size:
Implementation
Changes Made
VectorMinThreshold = 2andVectorMaxThreshold = 7812ShouldUseVectorOperations()method for intelligent decision makingVectorNot(),VectorAnd(),VectorOr(),VectorXor()ParallelVectorNot(),ParallelVectorAnd(),ParallelVectorOr(),ParallelVectorXor()Performance Results
Benefits
✅ Improved performance across all data size ranges
✅ Automatic optimization - no API changes required
✅ Backward compatible - all existing tests pass
✅ Predictable behavior - consistent performance characteristics
Test Results
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Resolves #72