Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [M3-8855] - Surface Node Pool Tags #11368

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

hana-akamai
Copy link
Contributor

@hana-akamai hana-akamai commented Dec 4, 2024

Description 📝

The /pools endpoint returns Tags for node pools, but we don't currently surface them in the UI: https://techdocs.akamai.com/linode-api/reference/get-lke-node-pool

At the bottom of each node pool section, we will now display the list of tags associated with a node pool and the option to add a new tag.

Changes 🔄

  • Added Tags to Kubernetes Node Pool table

Preview 📷

Screen.Recording.2024-12-05.at.12.46.32.PM.mov

How to test 🧪

Verification steps

(How to verify changes)

  • Go to a Kubernetes cluster's details page
  • Test the Add a Tag button at the bottom of a Node Pool table
yarn cy:run -s "cypress/e2e/core/kubernetes/lke-update.spec.ts"
Author Checklists

As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔

👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support


  • I have read and considered all applicable items listed above.

As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅

  • All unit tests are passing
  • TypeScript compilation succeeded without errors
  • Code passes all linting rules

@hana-akamai hana-akamai added the LKE Related to Linode Kubernetes Engine offerings label Dec 4, 2024
@hana-akamai hana-akamai self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
@hana-akamai hana-akamai marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 17:50
@hana-akamai hana-akamai requested review from a team as code owners December 5, 2024 17:50
@hana-akamai hana-akamai requested review from cliu-akamai, carrillo-erik, harsh-akamai and mjac0bs and removed request for a team December 5, 2024 17:50
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Coverage Report:
Base Coverage: 86.78%
Current Coverage: 86.78%

Copy link
Contributor

@mjac0bs mjac0bs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change looks good on desktop! I am wondering how we can best handle mobile view.

packages/api-v4/.changeset/pr-11368-added-1733420616390.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 173 to 188
<Box
alignItems="center"
data-testid={encryptionStatusTestId}
display="flex"
>
<Typography>Pool ID {poolId}</Typography>
<StyledVerticalDivider />
<EncryptedStatus
encryptionStatus={encryptionStatus}
tooltipText={DISK_ENCRYPTION_NODE_POOL_GUIDANCE_COPY}
/>
</Box>
) : (
<Typography>Pool ID {poolId}</Typography>
)}
</Box>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mobile.mov

We'll want to consider mobile view here, and might need some UX input. (Should we still have the ability to see tags in this view?) Currently, the tag cell will overlap with the pool id/encryption box once we get to ~500px in the viewport, and it gets worse at smaller screens (iPhone SE). Adjusting the box's width of 100% to less helps, but the tooltip still gets hidden. Maybe displaying tags under the pool id and encryption status is most readable?

Screenshot 2024-12-06 at 9 24 37 AM

Screenshot 2024-12-06 at 9 26 07 AM

Looks like there is also an existing issue where the Unlock icon has a min width of 16px, but the Lock icon does not, leading it to shrink and virtually disappear (and leave some odd spacing) behind at the smaller screen sizes. We could fix that here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mjac0bs Good catches, should be addressed now. I moved the tags to a separate row on mobile and removed the minWidth of 16px

Copy link
Contributor

@mjac0bs mjac0bs Dec 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks better! I think we should actually do this for tablet screen sizes too. There's an edge case with really long tags where, between tablet and mobile breakpoints, we still get some overlapping. Switching to displaying the tags below at the md breakpoint is also consistent with the cluster's tags. (Which seem to have their own buggy display issue... I'll create a follow up ticket to fix cluster tags. Update: M3-9009)

No issues after using md breakpoints instead of sm:

Screen.Recording.2024-12-11.at.12.59.02.PM.mov

@hana-akamai hana-akamai requested a review from mjac0bs December 11, 2024 16:53
Copy link
Contributor

@mjac0bs mjac0bs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Approving pending my one comment in the smaller screen sizes thread.

@hana-akamai hana-akamai added the Add'tl Approval Needed Waiting on another approval! label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@harsh-akamai harsh-akamai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

I have added 2 tags that are pretty short but one gets overlapped by the icon(this is for desktop view). I think this has come up with the new updates as the preview video doesn't have this bug.

@linode-gh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Cloud Manager UI test results

🎉 466 passing tests on test run #13 ↗︎

❌ Failing✅ Passing↪️ Skipped🕐 Duration
0 Failing466 Passing2 Skipped99m 1s

Copy link
Contributor

@harsh-akamai harsh-akamai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes @hana-akamai!

@harsh-akamai harsh-akamai added Approved Multiple approvals and ready to merge! and removed Add'tl Approval Needed Waiting on another approval! labels Dec 16, 2024
@mjac0bs mjac0bs merged commit 9f05357 into linode:develop Dec 17, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Cloud Manager E2E    Run #6983

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #6983  •  git commit 9f0535740e: feat: [M3-8855] - Surface Node Pool Tags (#11368)
Project Cloud Manager E2E
Branch Review develop
Run status status check passed Passed #6983
Run duration 29m 10s
Commit git commit 9f0535740e: feat: [M3-8855] - Surface Node Pool Tags (#11368)
Committer Hana Xu
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 3
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 2
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 469
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎

dmcintyr-akamai pushed a commit to dmcintyr-akamai/manager that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
* surface tags for node pools

* wip e2e

* fix e2e

* Added changeset: Surface Node Pool Tags

* fix unit test

* Added changeset: tags to KubeNodePoolResponse and CreateNodePoolData

* clean up

* address feedback

* clean up

* fix tags cutting off in mobile

* spacing

* use md breakpoint instead of sm

* styling
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Approved Multiple approvals and ready to merge! LKE Related to Linode Kubernetes Engine offerings
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants