-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 367
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upcoming: [DI-23083] - Migrated CloudPulseTimeRangeSelect to DateTimeRangePicker #11573
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
upcoming: [DI-23083] - Migrated CloudPulseTimeRangeSelect to DateTimeRangePicker #11573
Conversation
… for preset value
…evious preset selected
@@ -249,6 +248,9 @@ export const DateTimePicker = ({ | |||
padding: 0, | |||
}), | |||
}, | |||
field: { | |||
readOnly: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to avoid user to type inside time select otherwise it'll break the UI
handleTimeDurationChange(timerDuration); | ||
handleTimeDurationChange({ | ||
...timeDuration, | ||
end: convertToGmt(timeDuration.end), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
converting to gmt because api request accepts date in gmt format
Coverage Report: ✅ |
Cloud Manager UI test results🎉 488 passing tests on test run #4 ↗︎
|
Description 📝
Migrated Time range select component in ACLP to Date time range picker with presets component.
Changes 🔄
List any change(s) relevant to the reviewer.
Target release date 🗓️
10th February 2025
Preview 📷
Include a screenshot or screen recording of the change.
🔒 Use the Mask Sensitive Data setting for security.
💡 Use
<video src="" />
tag when including recordings in table.How to test 🧪
Prerequisites
(How to setup test environment)
Reproduction steps
(How to reproduce the issue, if applicable)
Verification steps
(How to verify changes)
Author Checklists
As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔
👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support
As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅