Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux 4.9 at91 dt overlays #34

Closed

Conversation

QSchulz
Copy link

@QSchulz QSchulz commented Aug 21, 2017

Now that it is possible to use DT overlay, update the branch to make it possible.

An upgrade of DTC to 1.4.3+ is required to have DT overlay support.

To make application of DT overlay possible, it is required to have symbols in the original DT. Thus, we add -@ to the DTC command in the kernel Makefile.

Move out of this repository anything than can be put in an overlay. They have been converted to DT overlays and moved to => https://github.com/QSchulz/dt-overlay-at91

Reviews very welcomed, especially on the conversion to DT overlays.

Update dtc to commit 558cd81bdd432769b59bff01240c44f82cfb1a9d (tag
v1.4.4).

The DT overlay mechanism was added in v1.4.3 so an update of dtc was
needed. Update to v1.4.4 (latest version at the time) to have all
possible fixes.
In order to apply on a Device Tree an overlay that has a phandle to a
certain DT node, we need symbols in the DTB of the Device Tree to which
the overlay is applied.

Without the symbols, the tool in charge of applying the overlay cannot
find the DT node to apply the overlay to.

This adds the -@ option to the call to dtc which enables the generation
of symbols.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
…rlays

Before DT overlays, we had a DT for each possible combination of
hardware. While there is mostly only support for different LCD at the
moment, the trade-off of this easy solution comes when you can have
multiple different hardwares at the same time, then the number of files
grows exponentially.

Now that we have support for DT overlays, move everything that can to DT
overlay and delete these DTs.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
noglitch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2017
[ Upstream commit bb1107f ]

Andrey Konovalov has reported the following warning triggered by the
syzkaller fuzzer.

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9935 at mm/page_alloc.c:3511 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x159c/0x1e20
  Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
  CPU: 1 PID: 9935 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7+ #34
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
    __alloc_pages_slowpath mm/page_alloc.c:3511
    __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x159c/0x1e20 mm/page_alloc.c:3781
    alloc_pages_current+0x1c7/0x6b0 mm/mempolicy.c:2072
    alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:469
    kmalloc_order+0x1f/0x70 mm/slab_common.c:1015
    kmalloc_order_trace+0x1f/0x160 mm/slab_common.c:1026
    kmalloc_large include/linux/slab.h:422
    __kmalloc+0x210/0x2d0 mm/slub.c:3723
    kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:495
    ep_write_iter+0x167/0xb50 drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/inode.c:664
    new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:499
    __vfs_write+0x483/0x760 fs/read_write.c:512
    vfs_write+0x170/0x4e0 fs/read_write.c:560
    SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:607
    SyS_write+0xfb/0x230 fs/read_write.c:599
    entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2

The issue is caused by a lack of size check for the request size in
ep_write_iter which should be fixed.  It, however, points to another
problem, that SLUB defines KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE too large because the its
KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX is (MAX_ORDER + PAGE_SHIFT) which means that the
resulting page allocator request might be MAX_ORDER which is too large
(see __alloc_pages_slowpath).

The same applies to the SLOB allocator which allows even larger sizes.
Make sure that they are capped properly and never request more than
MAX_ORDER order.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161220130659.16461-2-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This fixes conflicts with PDA overlays since PC10-11 conflict with can0
and PC26-27 conflict with can1.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
spi0 conflicts with isi. Disable it by default.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
ldesroches pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2018
[ Upstream commit 737f98c ]

Both q->mq_kobj and sw queues' kobjects should have been initialized
once, instead of doing that each add_disk context.

Also this patch removes clearing of ctx in blk_mq_init_cpu_queues()
because percpu allocator fills zero to allocated variable.

This patch fixes one issue[1] reported from Omar.

[1] kernel wearning when doing unbind/bind on one scsi-mq device

[   19.347924] kobject (ffff8800791ea0b8): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
[   19.349781] CPU: 1 PID: 84 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-00210-g53f39eeaa263 #34
[   19.350686] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-20161122_114906-anatol 04/01/2014
[   19.350920] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
[   19.350920] Call Trace:
[   19.350920]  dump_stack+0x63/0x83
[   19.350920]  kobject_init+0x77/0x90
[   19.350920]  blk_mq_register_dev+0x40/0x130
[   19.350920]  blk_register_queue+0xb6/0x190
[   19.350920]  device_add_disk+0x1ec/0x4b0
[   19.350920]  sd_probe_async+0x10d/0x1c0 [sd_mod]
[   19.350920]  async_run_entry_fn+0x48/0x150
[   19.350920]  process_one_work+0x1d0/0x480
[   19.350920]  worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
[   19.350920]  kthread+0x101/0x140
[   19.350920]  ? process_one_work+0x480/0x480
[   19.350920]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
[   19.350920]  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40

Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
@noglitch
Copy link
Member

Thanks @QSchulz. You work served as a base to support DT overlays in our linux-4.14-at91 kernel branch. We followed your advice but we'll not add this possibility to a 4.9-based kernel as you developed in a first place. So I close this PR.
Best regards,
Nicolas

@noglitch noglitch closed this Oct 15, 2018
noglitch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2020
[ Upstream commit 96298f6 ]

According to Core Spec Version 5.2 | Vol 3, Part A 6.1.5,
the incoming L2CAP_ConfigReq should be handled during
OPEN state.

The section below shows the btmon trace when running
L2CAP/COS/CFD/BV-12-C before and after this change.

=== Before ===
...
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 12                #22
      L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 2 len 4
        PSM: 1 (0x0001)
        Source CID: 65
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 16                #23
      L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 2 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Source CID: 65
        Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
        Status: No further information available (0x0000)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 12                #24
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 2 len 4
        Destination CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #25
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #26
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 16                #27
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00                                            ..
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 18                #28
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 3 len 10
        Source CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
        Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory]
          MTU: 672
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #29
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 14                #30
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 2 len 6
        Source CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 20                #31
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 12
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00 91 02 11 11                                ......
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 14                #32
      L2CAP: Command Reject (0x01) ident 3 len 6
        Reason: Invalid CID in request (0x0002)
        Destination CID: 64
        Source CID: 65
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5      #33
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
...
=== After ===
...
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 12               #22
      L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 2 len 4
        PSM: 1 (0x0001)
        Source CID: 65
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 16               #23
      L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 2 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Source CID: 65
        Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
        Status: No further information available (0x0000)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 12               #24
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 2 len 4
        Destination CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #25
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #26
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 16               #27
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 8
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00                                            ..
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 18               #28
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 3 len 10
        Source CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
        Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory]
          MTU: 672
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #29
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 14               #30
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 2 len 6
        Source CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
> ACL Data RX: Handle 256 flags 0x02 dlen 20               #31
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 12
        Destination CID: 64
        Flags: 0x0000
        Option: Unknown (0x10) [hint]
        01 00 91 02 11 11                                .....
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 18               #32
      L2CAP: Configure Response (0x05) ident 3 len 10
        Source CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
        Result: Success (0x0000)
        Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory]
          MTU: 672
< ACL Data TX: Handle 256 flags 0x00 dlen 12               #33
      L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 3 len 4
        Destination CID: 65
        Flags: 0x0000
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #34
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5     #35
        Num handles: 1
        Handle: 256
        Count: 1
...

Signed-off-by: Howard Chung <howardchung@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
noglitch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ]

We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically
btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc.  This was uncovered
by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which
converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep
annotations that don't exist with kworkers.  The lockdep splat is as
follows:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0
	 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
	 blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0
	 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
	 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
	 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0
	 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40
	 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140
	 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170
	 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0
	 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0
	 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0
	 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0
	 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs]
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs]
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}:
	 lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop]
	 loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop]
	 process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0
	 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
	 kthread+0x140/0x170
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

  -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0
	 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
	 kthread+0x140/0x170
	 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

  -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0
	 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320
	 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600
	 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
	 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
	 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop]
	 lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop]
	 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
	 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

  other info that might help us debug this:
  Chain exists of:
    (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
				 lock(&disk->open_mutex);
				 lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
    lock((wq_completion)loop0);

   *** DEADLOCK ***
  1 lock held by losetup/156417:
   #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop]

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
   check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120
   __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0
   lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320
   ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600
   flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600
   ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600
   drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
   destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
   __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop]
   lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop]
   ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0
   ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120
   ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80
   block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b

Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map
together all of the devices that match a specific uuid.  In rm_device
we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect
that here.

However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies,
as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus
we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added
under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with
loop devices.

We don't need the uuid mutex here however.  If we call
btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find
the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because
the fs_devices is open.  If we call it after the scratch happens it will
not appear to be a valid btrfs file system.

We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here
because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking.

So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat.

A more detailed explanation from the discussion:

We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this
change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does
run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing
without rm messing with us.

We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we
don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out.

The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able
to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets
consider this case.

Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing.  We'll
call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this
UUID.  At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex.  This is
what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here.

1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM.  We found our device,
   and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices
   to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because
   we haven't done the remove yet.

2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the
   device_list_mutex.  Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and
   does the

   if (fs_devices->opened)
	   return -EBUSY;

   check and we bail out.

Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real,
and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ copy more from the discussion ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
cristibirsan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2022
[ Upstream commit bcd7026 ]

By keep sending L2CAP_CONF_REQ packets, chan->num_conf_rsp increases
multiple times and eventually it will wrap around the maximum number
(i.e., 255).
This patch prevents this by adding a boundary check with
L2CAP_MAX_CONF_RSP

Btmon log:
Bluetooth monitor ver 5.64
= Note: Linux version 6.1.0-rc2 (x86_64)                               0.264594
= Note: Bluetooth subsystem version 2.22                               0.264636
@ MGMT Open: btmon (privileged) version 1.22                  {0x0001} 0.272191
= New Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 (Primary,Virtual,hci0)          [hci0] 13.877604
@ RAW Open: 9496 (privileged) version 2.22                   {0x0002} 13.890741
= Open Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00                                [hci0] 13.900426
(...)
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033             #32 [hci0] 14.273106
        invalid packet size (12 != 1033)
        08 00 01 00 02 01 04 00 01 10 ff ff              ............
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1547             #33 [hci0] 14.273561
        invalid packet size (14 != 1547)
        0a 00 01 00 04 01 06 00 40 00 00 00 00 00        ........@.....
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061             #34 [hci0] 14.274390
        invalid packet size (16 != 2061)
        0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 04  ........@.......
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061             #35 [hci0] 14.274932
        invalid packet size (16 != 2061)
        0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 07 00 03 00  ........@.......
= bluetoothd: Bluetooth daemon 5.43                                   14.401828
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033             #36 [hci0] 14.275753
        invalid packet size (12 != 1033)
        08 00 01 00 04 01 04 00 40 00 00 00              ........@...

Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants