-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#6422] pagination issues fixes #4513
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice fixes! just one small thing
4f8073d
to
cb06992
Compare
done both for react and django |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice, looks good to me!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
few questions :)
c0a1433
to
3b186fc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool, just a few comments and I just noticed when checking it this time that we don't use BEM, maybe we can change pagination-item to pagination__item?
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you only need to add the padding change here so all the other styles can be deleted, also as we are trying to adopt mobile first format you can use a min-width
query and swap the padding values around. For the padding values, as the smallest screen we ensure design works for is 360, I think the xaxis padding can be a touch bigger to help with button size a11y
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe 0.7 or 0.75 just from having a quick play in the browser but your call
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ $font-size-sm: 0.9rem !default; | |||
$font-size-xs: 0.8rem !default; | |||
|
|||
// use for min-width media-queries | |||
$breakpoint-xxs: 23.75rem !default; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do you want to add an additional breakpoint? also this is added as a min width value but you use it in a max width query, we don't really want to add additional break points as it add complexity, applying the same style up to a width of 512px is pretty standard, bootstraps first breakpoint is 576 so we aren't far off the norm.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh yeah, messing up things here! will remove it and use xs instead
3b186fc
to
6e31e1a
Compare
revert mobile version pagination: fix issues after review
6e31e1a
to
ee0929a
Compare
What is the status here? @khamui It is finished and can be reviewed again? Will you do that @phillimorland ? Or should I? (I am not sure I will notice everything you talked about.) |
@fuzzylogic2000 sorry didn't see the re-tag, will take a look now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
perfect! :)
No description provided.