Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[virtual-kubelet] namespacemap bidirectional fix #2870

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

cheina97
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR fixes a bug in "virtual-kubelet", causing an "OffloadingBackoff" when offloading a pod after a bidirectional peering.

@adamjensenbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @cheina97. Thanks for your PR!

I am @adamjensenbot.
You can interact with me issuing a slash command in the first line of a comment.
Currently, I understand the following commands:

  • /rebase: Rebase this PR onto the master branch (You can add the option test=true to launch the tests
    when the rebase operation is completed)
  • /merge: Merge this PR into the master branch
  • /build Build Liqo components
  • /test Launch the E2E and Unit tests
  • /hold, /unhold Add/remove the hold label to prevent merging with /merge

Make sure this PR appears in the liqo changelog, adding one of the following labels:

  • kind/breaking: 💥 Breaking Change
  • kind/feature: 🚀 New Feature
  • kind/bug: 🐛 Bug Fix
  • kind/cleanup: 🧹 Code Refactoring
  • kind/docs: 📝 Documentation

@cheina97
Copy link
Member Author

/rebase test=true

@fra98
Copy link
Member

fra98 commented Dec 16, 2024

/rebase test=true

@cheina97
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot added the merge-requested Request bot merging (automatically managed) label Dec 17, 2024
@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot merged commit 44de60b into liqotech:master Dec 17, 2024
13 checks passed
@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot removed the merge-requested Request bot merging (automatically managed) label Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants