-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 640
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
F4 lcd #336
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
F4 lcd #336
Conversation
Tested with #338 for now didn't bring up gfx stuff just run memtest and got changing colors on screen. |
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | |||
#pragma once |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a short license header here?
/** | ||
* @brief LCD Control pin | ||
*/ | ||
#define LCD_NCS_PIN GPIO_Pin_2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should there be some #includes up at the top of this file to make sure these are already defined?
@@ -0,0 +1,682 @@ | |||
/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As before, can you double check that the line endings are unix and the +x bit is not set?
Okay I merged and pushed the library this is built on. Can you rebase and do a pass over the comments above? |
Sure, will do |
Some notes:
This commit implements driver for ILI9341 found on stm32f429-DISCO1.
It is based on stm32 original driver and f7 eval driver from lk, both are mentioned in source file.
It is tested and seems to init display as excepted.
It is not fully working, as sdram is not yet up with lk on this board so i cant test layers and framebuffer.
Somr functionality of original st driver was removed, such as: second layer, drawing simple shapes, drawing bitmaps as ibelive those must be implemented on lk side, right?