-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add video support to segment-anything-2 pipeline #181
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
labels=kwargs.get('point_labels', None), | ||
) | ||
video_segments = {} # video_segments contains the per-frame segmentation results | ||
for out_frame_idx, out_obj_ids, out_mask_logits in self.tm_vid.propagate_in_video(inference_state): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a feeling we should return the full triple instead of creating a video segment, leaving post-processing to the consumer of the API ( though I recognize this is good quick way to validate the sanity of the mask outputs )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the guidance on this, I see how we can just return the results of self.tm_vid.propagate_in_video(inference_state):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a feeling we should return the full triple instead of creating a video segment, leaving post-processing to the consumer of the API ( though I recognize this is good quick way to validate the sanity of the mask outputs )
I had some issues trying to return the correct values. I added frame index as an input parameter, normally propagate_in_video
will loop returning results for each frame starting at the frame index until the end of the video, now it should only return a single frame. But the data doesn't look correct, can you take a look? @pschroedl
f8a45d9
to
3040cbd
Compare
3040cbd
to
658cf87
Compare
568dfcc
to
675568f
Compare
This change updates the request field
image
tomedia_file
and loads the appropriate segment-anything-2 inference model based on the content type of the file. It uses ffmpeg to process the video to image frames and loads them in with inference values from the request.Some adjustments still need to be made to the request/response parameters. I think "frame index" and "object id' may be two request parameters to add to this pipeline for the video requests, I've hard coded some values for now.