Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CIR][ABI][AArch64][Lowering] Support structures with padding #1118

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

bruteforceboy
Copy link
Contributor

The title describes the purpose of the PR. It adds initial support for structures with padding to the call convention lowering for AArch64.

I have also initial support for the missing feature FinishLayout for records, and the logic is gotten from the original codegen.

Finally, I added a test for verification.

Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Content LGTM, some minor nits before approval

S_PAD s;
return s;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+EOL

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes merged commit 70fed1b into llvm:main Nov 19, 2024
6 checks passed
bruteforceboy added a commit to bruteforceboy/clangir that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
)

The title describes the purpose of the PR. It adds initial support for
structures with padding to the call convention lowering for AArch64.

I have also _initial support_ for the missing feature
[FinishLayout](https://github.com/llvm/clangir/blob/5c5d58402bebdb1e851fb055f746662d4e7eb586/clang/lib/AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp#L786)
for records, and the logic is gotten from the original codegen.

Finally, I added a test for verification.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants