Skip to content

Conversation

@c8ef
Copy link
Contributor

@c8ef c8ef commented Jul 30, 2024

close: #100264

@c8ef c8ef requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2024 12:58
"`3235 <https://wg21.link/LWG3235>`__","``parse``\ manipulator without abbreviation is not callable","Belfast","",""
"`3246 <https://wg21.link/LWG3246>`__","What are the constraints on the template parameter of ``basic_format_arg``\ ?","Belfast","","","|format|"
"`3253 <https://wg21.link/LWG3253>`__","``basic_syncbuf::basic_syncbuf()``\ should not be explicit","Belfast","",""
"`3253 <https://wg21.link/LWG3253>`__","``basic_syncbuf::basic_syncbuf()``\ should not be explicit","Belfast","|Complete|","19.0"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"`3253 <https://wg21.link/LWG3253>`__","``basic_syncbuf::basic_syncbuf()``\ should not be explicit","Belfast","|Complete|","19.0"
"`3253 <https://wg21.link/LWG3253>`__","``basic_syncbuf::basic_syncbuf()``\ should not be explicit","Belfast","|Complete|","20.0"

using streambuf_type = basic_streambuf<_CharT, _Traits>;

// [syncstream.syncbuf.cons], construction and destruction
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI basic_syncbuf() : basic_syncbuf(nullptr) {}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have a test?

@Zingam
Copy link
Contributor

Zingam commented Jul 30, 2024

Typically libc++ PRs are prefixed with [libc++][syncstream] LWG.....

@Zingam
Copy link
Contributor

Zingam commented Jul 30, 2024

I also see an open PR: #99778

@mordante
Copy link
Member

I'm closing this since it's a duplicate of #99778, which has been approved.

@mordante mordante closed this Jul 30, 2024
@c8ef c8ef deleted the LWG/issue3253 branch July 30, 2024 23:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LWG3253: basic_syncbuf::basic_syncbuf() should not be explicit

3 participants