-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release/19.x: Reapply "[sanitizer_common] AND signals in BlockSignals instead of deleting (#113443)" for non-Android Linux only (#115790) #116670
Conversation
…leting (llvm#113443)" for non-Android Linux only (llvm#115790) The original patch (25fd366) was reverted in 083a5cd because it broke some buildbots. This revised patch makes two changes: - Reverts to *pre-llvm#98200* behavior for Android. This avoids a build breakage on Android. - Only define KeepUnblocked if SANITIZER_LINUX: this avoids a build breakage on solaris, which does not support internal_sigdelset. N.B. Other buildbot failures were non-sanitizer tests and are therefore unrelated. Original commit message: My earlier patch llvm#98200 caused a regression because it unconditionally unblocked synchronous signals, even if the user program had deliberately blocked them. This patch fixes the issue by checking the current signal mask, as suggested by Vitaly. It also adds tests. Fixes llvm#113385 (cherry picked from commit 531acf9)
@thurstond What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 531acf9 Requested by: @thurstond Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116670.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp
index b9b1f496df7c98..be3b3bd94e2a58 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp
+++ b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp
@@ -160,33 +160,56 @@ void SetSigProcMask(__sanitizer_sigset_t *set, __sanitizer_sigset_t *oldset) {
CHECK_EQ(0, internal_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, set, oldset));
}
+# if SANITIZER_LINUX
+// Deletes the specified signal from newset, if it is not present in oldset
+// Equivalently: newset[signum] = newset[signum] & oldset[signum]
+static void KeepUnblocked(__sanitizer_sigset_t &newset,
+ __sanitizer_sigset_t &oldset, int signum) {
+ // FIXME: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1816
+ if (SANITIZER_ANDROID || !internal_sigismember(&oldset, signum))
+ internal_sigdelset(&newset, signum);
+}
+# endif
+
// Block asynchronous signals
void BlockSignals(__sanitizer_sigset_t *oldset) {
- __sanitizer_sigset_t set;
- internal_sigfillset(&set);
-# if SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+ __sanitizer_sigset_t newset;
+ internal_sigfillset(&newset);
+
+# if SANITIZER_LINUX
+ __sanitizer_sigset_t currentset;
+
+# if !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+ // FIXME: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1816
+ SetSigProcMask(NULL, ¤tset);
+
// Glibc uses SIGSETXID signal during setuid call. If this signal is blocked
// on any thread, setuid call hangs.
// See test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/Linux/setuid.c.
- internal_sigdelset(&set, 33);
-# endif
-# if SANITIZER_LINUX
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, 33);
+# endif // !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+
// Seccomp-BPF-sandboxed processes rely on SIGSYS to handle trapped syscalls.
// If this signal is blocked, such calls cannot be handled and the process may
// hang.
- internal_sigdelset(&set, 31);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, 31);
+# if !SANITIZER_ANDROID
// Don't block synchronous signals
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGSEGV);
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGBUS);
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGILL);
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGTRAP);
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGABRT);
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGFPE);
- internal_sigdelset(&set, SIGPIPE);
-# endif
+ // but also don't unblock signals that the user had deliberately blocked.
+ // FIXME: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1816
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGSEGV);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGBUS);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGILL);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGTRAP);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGABRT);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGFPE);
+ KeepUnblocked(newset, currentset, SIGPIPE);
+# endif //! SANITIZER_ANDROID
+
+# endif // SANITIZER_LINUX
- SetSigProcMask(&set, oldset);
+ SetSigProcMask(&newset, oldset);
}
ScopedBlockSignals::ScopedBlockSignals(__sanitizer_sigset_t *copy) {
diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/CMakeLists.txt b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/CMakeLists.txt
index 2b4c15125263a9..fef8bb772e0e0d 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ set(SANITIZER_UNITTESTS
sanitizer_array_ref_test.cpp
sanitizer_atomic_test.cpp
sanitizer_bitvector_test.cpp
+ sanitizer_block_signals.cpp
sanitizer_bvgraph_test.cpp
sanitizer_chained_origin_depot_test.cpp
sanitizer_common_test.cpp
diff --git a/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_block_signals.cpp b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_block_signals.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..b43648a8aef230
--- /dev/null
+++ b/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_block_signals.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+//===-- sanitizer_block_signals.cpp ---------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file is a part of sanitizer_common unit tests.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+#include "sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.h"
+
+namespace __sanitizer {
+
+#if SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+volatile int received_sig = -1;
+
+void signal_handler(int signum) { received_sig = signum; }
+
+TEST(SanitizerCommon, NoBlockSignals) {
+ // No signals blocked
+ signal(SIGUSR1, signal_handler);
+ raise(SIGUSR1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, SIGUSR1);
+
+ received_sig = -1;
+ signal(SIGPIPE, signal_handler);
+ raise(SIGPIPE);
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, SIGPIPE);
+}
+
+TEST(SanitizerCommon, BlockSignalsPlain) {
+ // ScopedBlockSignals; SIGUSR1 should be blocked but not SIGPIPE
+ {
+ __sanitizer_sigset_t sigset = {};
+ ScopedBlockSignals block(&sigset);
+
+ received_sig = -1;
+ signal(SIGUSR1, signal_handler);
+ raise(SIGUSR1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, -1);
+
+ received_sig = -1;
+ signal(SIGPIPE, signal_handler);
+ raise(SIGPIPE);
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, SIGPIPE);
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, SIGUSR1);
+}
+
+TEST(SanitizerCommon, BlockSignalsExceptPipe) {
+ // Manually block SIGPIPE; ScopedBlockSignals should not unblock this
+ sigset_t block_sigset;
+ sigemptyset(&block_sigset);
+ sigaddset(&block_sigset, SIGPIPE);
+ sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &block_sigset, NULL);
+ {
+ __sanitizer_sigset_t sigset = {};
+ ScopedBlockSignals block(&sigset);
+
+ received_sig = -1;
+ signal(SIGPIPE, signal_handler);
+ raise(SIGPIPE);
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, -1);
+ }
+ sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &block_sigset, NULL);
+ EXPECT_EQ(received_sig, SIGPIPE);
+}
+#endif // SANITIZER_LINUX && !SANITIZER_ANDROID
+
+} // namespace __sanitizer
|
@llvmbot Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
@thurstond (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
Fixes a regression whereby the sanitizers may incorrectly unblock signals that had been blocked by the user. |
Backport 531acf9
Requested by: @thurstond