-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[X86] Ignore REX prefixes not immediately before opcode #117299
[X86] Ignore REX prefixes not immediately before opcode #117299
Conversation
The Intel X86 Architecture Manual says the following: > A REX prefix is ignored, as are its individual bits, when it is not needed > for an instruction or when it does not immediately precede the opcode byte or > the escape opcode byte (0FH) of an instruction for which it is needed. This > has the implication that only one REX prefix, properly located, can affect an > instruction. We currently do not handle these cases in the disassembler, leading to incorrect disassembly. This patch rectifies the situation by treating REX prefixes as standard prefixes rather than only expecting them before the Opcode. The motivating test case added as a test was fuzzer generated.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 Author: Aiden Grossman (boomanaiden154) ChangesThe Intel X86 Architecture Manual says the following: > A REX prefix is ignored, as are its individual bits, when it is not needed We currently do not handle these cases in the disassembler, leading to incorrect disassembly. This patch rectifies the situation by treating REX prefixes as standard prefixes rather than only expecting them before the Opcode. The motivating test case added as a test was fuzzer generated. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117299.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86Disassembler.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86Disassembler.cpp
index c3eae294919f3c..c27177484f55a4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86Disassembler.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/Disassembler/X86Disassembler.cpp
@@ -329,6 +329,14 @@ static int readPrefixes(struct InternalInstruction *insn) {
break;
}
+ if (isREX(insn, byte)) {
+ insn->rexPrefix = byte;
+ isPrefix = true;
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << format("Found REX prefix 0x%hhx", byte));
+ } else if (isPrefix) {
+ insn->rexPrefix = 0;
+ }
+
if (isPrefix)
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << format("Found prefix 0x%hhx", byte));
}
@@ -506,11 +514,6 @@ static int readPrefixes(struct InternalInstruction *insn) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << format("Found REX2 prefix 0x%hhx 0x%hhx",
insn->rex2ExtensionPrefix[0],
insn->rex2ExtensionPrefix[1]));
- } else if (isREX(insn, byte)) {
- if (peek(insn, nextByte))
- return -1;
- insn->rexPrefix = byte;
- LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << format("Found REX prefix 0x%hhx", byte));
} else
--insn->readerCursor;
diff --git a/llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/X86/x86-64.txt b/llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/X86/x86-64.txt
index 8d6564dd098990..b41226766a194e 100644
--- a/llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/X86/x86-64.txt
+++ b/llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/X86/x86-64.txt
@@ -770,3 +770,8 @@
# CHECK: prefetchit1 (%rip)
0x0f,0x18,0x35,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
+
+# Check that we correctly ignore a REX prefix that is not immediately before
+# the opcode.
+# CHECK: orw $25659, %ax
+0x66 0x4c 0x64 0x0d 0x3b 0x64
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The Intel X86 Architecture Manual says the following:
We currently do not handle these cases in the disassembler, leading to incorrect disassembly. This patch rectifies the situation by treating REX prefixes as standard prefixes rather than only expecting them before the Opcode.
The motivating test case added as a test was fuzzer generated.