-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[InstCombine] Recursively replace condition with constant in select arms #120011
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Yingwei Zheng (dtcxzyw) ChangesThis patch is proposed to reduce the number of selects with undefs introduced by #119884. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120011.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
index 50dfb58cadb17b..5eebfdb774d2e2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
@@ -3800,6 +3800,12 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) {
ConstantInt::getFalse(CondType), SQ,
/* AllowRefinement */ true))
return replaceOperand(SI, 2, S);
+
+ if (replaceInInstruction(TrueVal, CondVal,
+ ConstantInt::getTrue(CondType)) ||
+ replaceInInstruction(FalseVal, CondVal,
+ ConstantInt::getFalse(CondType)))
+ return &SI;
}
if (Instruction *R = foldSelectOfBools(SI))
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select.ll
index 82c079d681284d..48af18b00ff5a7 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select.ll
@@ -4580,9 +4580,8 @@ define i32 @src_select_xxory_eq0_xorxy_y(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
define i32 @sequence_select_with_same_cond_false(i1 %c1, i1 %c2){
; CHECK-LABEL: @sequence_select_with_same_cond_false(
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[S1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C1:%.*]], i32 23, i32 45
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[S2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i32 666, i32 [[S1]]
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[S3:%.*]] = select i1 [[C1]], i32 789, i32 [[S2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[S2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i32 666, i32 45
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[S3:%.*]] = select i1 [[C1:%.*]], i32 789, i32 [[S2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[S3]]
;
%s1 = select i1 %c1, i32 23, i32 45
@@ -4593,9 +4592,8 @@ define i32 @sequence_select_with_same_cond_false(i1 %c1, i1 %c2){
define i32 @sequence_select_with_same_cond_true(i1 %c1, i1 %c2){
; CHECK-LABEL: @sequence_select_with_same_cond_true(
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[S1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C1:%.*]], i32 45, i32 23
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[S2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i32 [[S1]], i32 666
-; CHECK-NEXT: [[S3:%.*]] = select i1 [[C1]], i32 [[S2]], i32 789
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[S2:%.*]] = select i1 [[C2:%.*]], i32 45, i32 666
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[S3:%.*]] = select i1 [[C1:%.*]], i32 [[S2]], i32 789
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[S3]]
;
%s1 = select i1 %c1, i32 45, i32 23
@@ -4766,3 +4764,70 @@ define i32 @sel_extractvalue_simplify(i1 %c, { i32, i32 } %agg1, i32 %x, i32 %y)
%res = extractvalue { i32, i32 } %sel, 1
ret i32 %res
}
+
+define i1 @replace_select_cond_true(i1 %cond, i32 %v1, i32 %v2, i32 %v3) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @replace_select_cond_true(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[SEL:%.*]], [[V2:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND:%.*]], i1 [[CMP]], i1 false
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[AND]]
+;
+ %sel = select i1 %cond, i32 %v1, i32 %v3
+ %cmp = icmp eq i32 %sel, %v2
+ %and = select i1 %cond, i1 %cmp, i1 false
+ ret i1 %and
+}
+
+define i1 @replace_select_cond_false(i1 %cond, i32 %v1, i32 %v2, i32 %v3) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @replace_select_cond_false(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[SEL:%.*]], [[V2:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[OR:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND:%.*]], i1 true, i1 [[CMP]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[OR]]
+;
+ %sel = select i1 %cond, i32 %v1, i32 %v3
+ %cmp = icmp eq i32 %sel, %v2
+ %or = select i1 %cond, i1 true, i1 %cmp
+ ret i1 %or
+}
+
+define i32 @replace_and_cond(i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @replace_and_cond(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[AND:%.*]], i32 3, i32 2
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MUX:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND1:%.*]], i32 [[SEL]], i32 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[MUX]]
+;
+ %and = and i1 %cond1, %cond2
+ %sel = select i1 %and, i32 3, i32 2
+ %mux = select i1 %cond1, i32 %sel, i32 1
+ ret i32 %mux
+}
+
+; TODO: We can still replace the use of %and with %cond2
+define i32 @replace_and_cond_multiuse1(i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @replace_and_cond_multiuse1(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND1:%.*]], [[COND2:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @use(i1 [[AND]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[AND]], i32 3, i32 2
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MUX:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND1]], i32 [[SEL]], i32 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[MUX]]
+;
+ %and = and i1 %cond1, %cond2
+ call void @use(i1 %and)
+ %sel = select i1 %and, i32 3, i32 2
+ %mux = select i1 %cond1, i32 %sel, i32 1
+ ret i32 %mux
+}
+
+define i32 @replace_and_cond_multiuse2(i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @replace_and_cond_multiuse2(
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND:%.*]] = and i1 [[COND1:%.*]], [[COND2:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[AND]], i32 3, i32 2
+; CHECK-NEXT: call void @use32(i32 [[SEL]])
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MUX:%.*]] = select i1 [[COND1]], i32 [[SEL]], i32 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[MUX]]
+;
+ %and = and i1 %cond1, %cond2
+ %sel = select i1 %and, i32 3, i32 2
+ call void @use32(i32 %sel)
+ %mux = select i1 %cond1, i32 %sel, i32 1
+ ret i32 %mux
+}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
This patch is proposed to reduce the number of selects with undefs introduced by #119884.
It is an alternative to #83405.