-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release/19.x: [RISCV] Don't create BuildPairF64 or SplitF64 nodes without D or Zdinx. (#116159) #121501
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Craig Topper (topperc) ChangesThe fix in ReplaceNodeResults is the only one really required for the known crash. I couldn't hit the case in LowerOperation because that requires (f64 (bitcast i64)), but the result type is softened before the input so we don't get a chance to legalize the input. The change to the setOperationAction call was an observation that a i64<->vector cast should not be custom legalized on RV32. The custom code already calls isTypeLegal on the scalar type. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121501.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index 823fb428472ef3..badbb425997447 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -1396,8 +1396,9 @@ RISCVTargetLowering::RISCVTargetLowering(const TargetMachine &TM,
}
// Custom-legalize bitcasts from fixed-length vectors to scalar types.
- setOperationAction(ISD::BITCAST, {MVT::i8, MVT::i16, MVT::i32, MVT::i64},
- Custom);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::BITCAST, {MVT::i8, MVT::i16, MVT::i32}, Custom);
+ if (Subtarget.is64Bit())
+ setOperationAction(ISD::BITCAST, MVT::i64, Custom);
if (Subtarget.hasStdExtZfhminOrZhinxmin())
setOperationAction(ISD::BITCAST, MVT::f16, Custom);
if (Subtarget.hasStdExtFOrZfinx())
@@ -6317,7 +6318,8 @@ SDValue RISCVTargetLowering::LowerOperation(SDValue Op,
DAG.getNode(RISCVISD::FMV_W_X_RV64, DL, MVT::f32, NewOp0);
return FPConv;
}
- if (VT == MVT::f64 && Op0VT == MVT::i64 && XLenVT == MVT::i32) {
+ if (VT == MVT::f64 && Op0VT == MVT::i64 && !Subtarget.is64Bit() &&
+ Subtarget.hasStdExtDOrZdinx()) {
SDValue Lo, Hi;
std::tie(Lo, Hi) = DAG.SplitScalar(Op0, DL, MVT::i32, MVT::i32);
SDValue RetReg =
@@ -12616,7 +12618,8 @@ void RISCVTargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults(SDNode *N,
SDValue FPConv =
DAG.getNode(RISCVISD::FMV_X_ANYEXTW_RV64, DL, MVT::i64, Op0);
Results.push_back(DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, DL, MVT::i32, FPConv));
- } else if (VT == MVT::i64 && Op0VT == MVT::f64 && XLenVT == MVT::i32) {
+ } else if (VT == MVT::i64 && Op0VT == MVT::f64 && !Subtarget.is64Bit() &&
+ Subtarget.hasStdExtDOrZdinx()) {
SDValue NewReg = DAG.getNode(RISCVISD::SplitF64, DL,
DAG.getVTList(MVT::i32, MVT::i32), Op0);
SDValue RetReg = DAG.getNode(ISD::BUILD_PAIR, DL, MVT::i64,
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/rv32-zve-bitcast-crash.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/rv32-zve-bitcast-crash.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..d6612c9d025afa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/rv32-zve-bitcast-crash.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv32 -mattr=+zve32f,+zvl128b | FileCheck %s
+
+; This bitcast previously incorrectly produce a SplitF64 node.
+
+define i64 @foo(double %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: addi sp, sp, -16
+; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+; CHECK-NEXT: sw ra, 12(sp) # 4-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_offset ra, -4
+; CHECK-NEXT: lui a3, 261888
+; CHECK-NEXT: li a2, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT: call __adddf3
+; CHECK-NEXT: lw ra, 12(sp) # 4-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT: addi sp, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %a = fadd double %x, 1.0
+ %b = bitcast double %a to i64
+ ret i64 %b
+}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I guess this would have been easier had the original test had nounwind
, but that's life. I don't think we should change it on the branch.
6259727
to
61c9f97
Compare
…x. (llvm#116159) The fix in ReplaceNodeResults is the only one really required for the known crash. I couldn't hit the case in LowerOperation because that requires (f64 (bitcast i64)), but the result type is softened before the input so we don't get a chance to legalize the input. The change to the setOperationAction call was an observation that a i64<->vector cast should not be custom legalized on RV32. The custom code already calls isTypeLegal on the scalar type.
@topperc (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
The fix in ReplaceNodeResults is the only one really required for the known crash.
I couldn't hit the case in LowerOperation because that requires (f64 (bitcast i64)), but the result type is softened before the input so we don't get a chance to legalize the input.
The change to the setOperationAction call was an observation that a i64<->vector cast should not be custom legalized on RV32. The custom code already calls isTypeLegal on the scalar type.