-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
[BOLT] Gadget scanner: make use of C++17 features and LLVM helpers #141665
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt Author: Anatoly Trosinenko (atrosinenko) ChangesPerform trivial syntactical cleanups:
This patch is NFC aside from minor debug output changes. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141665.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp b/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp
index b7573c96d183e..4d283482d9472 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Passes/PAuthGadgetScanner.cpp
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ class TrackedRegisters {
TrackedRegisters(ArrayRef<MCPhysReg> RegsToTrack)
: Registers(RegsToTrack),
RegToIndexMapping(getMappingSize(RegsToTrack), NoIndex) {
- for (unsigned I = 0; I < RegsToTrack.size(); ++I)
- RegToIndexMapping[RegsToTrack[I]] = I;
+ for (auto [MappedIndex, Reg] : llvm::enumerate(RegsToTrack))
+ RegToIndexMapping[Reg] = MappedIndex;
}
ArrayRef<MCPhysReg> getRegisters() const { return Registers; }
@@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ struct SrcState {
SafeToDerefRegs &= StateIn.SafeToDerefRegs;
TrustedRegs &= StateIn.TrustedRegs;
- for (unsigned I = 0; I < LastInstWritingReg.size(); ++I)
- for (const MCInst *J : StateIn.LastInstWritingReg[I])
- LastInstWritingReg[I].insert(J);
+ for (auto [ThisSet, OtherSet] :
+ llvm::zip_equal(LastInstWritingReg, StateIn.LastInstWritingReg))
+ ThisSet.insert_range(OtherSet);
return *this;
}
@@ -224,11 +224,9 @@ struct SrcState {
static void printInstsShort(raw_ostream &OS,
ArrayRef<SetOfRelatedInsts> Insts) {
OS << "Insts: ";
- for (unsigned I = 0; I < Insts.size(); ++I) {
- auto &Set = Insts[I];
+ for (auto [I, PtrSet] : llvm::enumerate(Insts)) {
OS << "[" << I << "](";
- for (const MCInst *MCInstP : Set)
- OS << MCInstP << " ";
+ interleave(PtrSet, OS, " ");
OS << ")";
}
}
@@ -416,8 +414,9 @@ class SrcSafetyAnalysis {
// ... an address can be updated in a safe manner, producing the result
// which is as trusted as the input address.
if (auto DstAndSrc = BC.MIB->analyzeAddressArithmeticsForPtrAuth(Point)) {
- if (Cur.SafeToDerefRegs[DstAndSrc->second])
- Regs.push_back(DstAndSrc->first);
+ auto [DstReg, SrcReg] = *DstAndSrc;
+ if (Cur.SafeToDerefRegs[SrcReg])
+ Regs.push_back(DstReg);
}
// Make sure explicit checker sequence keeps register safe-to-dereference
@@ -469,8 +468,9 @@ class SrcSafetyAnalysis {
// ... an address can be updated in a safe manner, producing the result
// which is as trusted as the input address.
if (auto DstAndSrc = BC.MIB->analyzeAddressArithmeticsForPtrAuth(Point)) {
- if (Cur.TrustedRegs[DstAndSrc->second])
- Regs.push_back(DstAndSrc->first);
+ auto [DstReg, SrcReg] = *DstAndSrc;
+ if (Cur.TrustedRegs[SrcReg])
+ Regs.push_back(DstReg);
}
return Regs;
@@ -845,9 +845,9 @@ struct DstState {
return (*this = StateIn);
CannotEscapeUnchecked &= StateIn.CannotEscapeUnchecked;
- for (unsigned I = 0; I < FirstInstLeakingReg.size(); ++I)
- for (const MCInst *J : StateIn.FirstInstLeakingReg[I])
- FirstInstLeakingReg[I].insert(J);
+ for (auto [ThisSet, OtherSet] :
+ llvm::zip_equal(FirstInstLeakingReg, StateIn.FirstInstLeakingReg))
+ ThisSet.insert_range(OtherSet);
return *this;
}
@@ -1012,8 +1012,7 @@ class DstSafetyAnalysis {
// ... an address can be updated in a safe manner, or
if (auto DstAndSrc = BC.MIB->analyzeAddressArithmeticsForPtrAuth(Inst)) {
- MCPhysReg DstReg, SrcReg;
- std::tie(DstReg, SrcReg) = *DstAndSrc;
+ auto [DstReg, SrcReg] = *DstAndSrc;
// Note that *all* registers containing the derived values must be safe,
// both source and destination ones. No temporaries are supported at now.
if (Cur.CannotEscapeUnchecked[SrcReg] &&
@@ -1052,7 +1051,7 @@ class DstSafetyAnalysis {
// If this instruction terminates the program immediately, no
// authentication oracles are possible past this point.
if (BC.MIB->isTrap(Point)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG({ traceInst(BC, "Trap instruction found", Point); });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(traceInst(BC, "Trap instruction found", Point));
DstState Next(NumRegs, RegsToTrackInstsFor.getNumTrackedRegisters());
Next.CannotEscapeUnchecked.set();
return Next;
@@ -1234,7 +1233,7 @@ class CFGUnawareDstSafetyAnalysis : public DstSafetyAnalysis,
// starting to analyze Inst.
if (BC.MIB->isCall(Inst) || BC.MIB->isBranch(Inst) ||
BC.MIB->isReturn(Inst)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG({ traceInst(BC, "Control flow instruction", Inst); });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(traceInst(BC, "Control flow instruction", Inst));
S = createUnsafeState();
}
@@ -1372,12 +1371,12 @@ shouldReportUnsafeTailCall(const BinaryContext &BC, const BinaryFunction &BF,
// such libc, ignore tail calls performed by ELF entry function.
if (BC.StartFunctionAddress &&
*BC.StartFunctionAddress == Inst.getFunction()->getAddress()) {
- LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << " Skipping tail call in ELF entry function.\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Skipping tail call in ELF entry function.\n");
return std::nullopt;
}
if (BC.MIB->isSafeJumpTableBranchForPtrAuth(Inst)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << " Safe jump table detected, skipping.\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Safe jump table detected, skipping.\n");
return std::nullopt;
}
@@ -1412,7 +1411,7 @@ shouldReportCallGadget(const BinaryContext &BC, const MCInstReference &Inst,
return std::nullopt;
if (BC.MIB->isSafeJumpTableBranchForPtrAuth(Inst)) {
- LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << " Safe jump table detected, skipping.\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Safe jump table detected, skipping.\n");
return std::nullopt;
}
@@ -1457,7 +1456,7 @@ shouldReportAuthOracle(const BinaryContext &BC, const MCInstReference &Inst,
});
if (S.empty()) {
- LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << " DstState is empty!\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " DstState is empty!\n");
return make_generic_report(
Inst, "Warning: no state computed for an authentication instruction "
"(possibly unreachable)");
@@ -1484,7 +1483,7 @@ collectRegsToTrack(ArrayRef<PartialReport<MCPhysReg>> Reports) {
void FunctionAnalysisContext::findUnsafeUses(
SmallVector<PartialReport<MCPhysReg>> &Reports) {
auto Analysis = SrcSafetyAnalysis::create(BF, AllocatorId, {});
- LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << "Running src register safety analysis...\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Running src register safety analysis...\n");
Analysis->run();
LLVM_DEBUG({
dbgs() << "After src register safety analysis:\n";
@@ -1536,8 +1535,7 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::findUnsafeUses(
const SrcState &S = Analysis->getStateBefore(Inst);
if (S.empty()) {
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- { traceInst(BC, "Instruction has no state, skipping", Inst); });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(traceInst(BC, "Instruction has no state, skipping", Inst));
assert(UnreachableBBReported && "Should be reported at least once");
(void)UnreachableBBReported;
return;
@@ -1564,8 +1562,7 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::augmentUnsafeUseReports(
SmallVector<MCPhysReg> RegsToTrack = collectRegsToTrack(Reports);
// Re-compute the analysis with register tracking.
auto Analysis = SrcSafetyAnalysis::create(BF, AllocatorId, RegsToTrack);
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- { dbgs() << "\nRunning detailed src register safety analysis...\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nRunning detailed src register safety analysis...\n");
Analysis->run();
LLVM_DEBUG({
dbgs() << "After detailed src register safety analysis:\n";
@@ -1575,7 +1572,7 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::augmentUnsafeUseReports(
// Augment gadget reports.
for (auto &Report : Reports) {
MCInstReference Location = Report.Issue->Location;
- LLVM_DEBUG({ traceInst(BC, "Attaching clobbering info to", Location); });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(traceInst(BC, "Attaching clobbering info to", Location));
assert(Report.RequestedDetails &&
"Should be removed by handleSimpleReports");
auto DetailedInfo =
@@ -1593,7 +1590,7 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::findUnsafeDefs(
return;
auto Analysis = DstSafetyAnalysis::create(BF, AllocatorId, {});
- LLVM_DEBUG({ dbgs() << "Running dst register safety analysis...\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Running dst register safety analysis...\n");
Analysis->run();
LLVM_DEBUG({
dbgs() << "After dst register safety analysis:\n";
@@ -1616,8 +1613,7 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::augmentUnsafeDefReports(
SmallVector<MCPhysReg> RegsToTrack = collectRegsToTrack(Reports);
// Re-compute the analysis with register tracking.
auto Analysis = DstSafetyAnalysis::create(BF, AllocatorId, RegsToTrack);
- LLVM_DEBUG(
- { dbgs() << "\nRunning detailed dst register safety analysis...\n"; });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nRunning detailed dst register safety analysis...\n");
Analysis->run();
LLVM_DEBUG({
dbgs() << "After detailed dst register safety analysis:\n";
@@ -1627,7 +1623,7 @@ void FunctionAnalysisContext::augmentUnsafeDefReports(
// Augment gadget reports.
for (auto &Report : Reports) {
MCInstReference Location = Report.Issue->Location;
- LLVM_DEBUG({ traceInst(BC, "Attaching leakage info to", Location); });
+ LLVM_DEBUG(traceInst(BC, "Attaching leakage info to", Location));
assert(Report.RequestedDetails &&
"Should be removed by handleSimpleReports");
auto DetailedInfo = std::make_shared<LeakageInfo>(
@@ -1760,8 +1756,7 @@ static void printRelatedInstrs(raw_ostream &OS, const MCInstReference Location,
// Sort the references to make output deterministic.
SmallVector<MCInstReference> RI(RelatedInstrs);
llvm::sort(RI);
- for (unsigned I = 0; I < RI.size(); ++I) {
- MCInstReference InstRef = RI[I];
+ for (auto [I, InstRef] : llvm::enumerate(RI)) {
OS << " " << (I + 1) << ". ";
BC.printInstruction(OS, InstRef, getAddress(InstRef), &BF);
};
diff --git a/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s b/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s
index e99599c7463c6..f5e00c19dd26b 100644
--- a/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s
+++ b/bolt/test/binary-analysis/AArch64/gs-pauth-debug-output.s
@@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ clobber:
// CHECK-EMPTY:
// CHECK-NEXT: Running detailed src register safety analysis...
// CHECK-NEXT: SrcSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext( mov w30, #0x0, src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: LR W30 W30_HI , TrustedRegs: LR W30 W30_HI , Insts: [0]()>)
-// CHECK-NEXT: .. result: (src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: W30_HI , TrustedRegs: W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>)
-// CHECK-NEXT: SrcSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext( ret x30, src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: W30_HI , TrustedRegs: W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>)
-// CHECK-NEXT: .. result: (src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: W30_HI , TrustedRegs: W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>)
+// CHECK-NEXT: .. result: (src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: W30_HI , TrustedRegs: W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>)
+// CHECK-NEXT: SrcSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext( ret x30, src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: W30_HI , TrustedRegs: W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>)
+// CHECK-NEXT: .. result: (src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: W30_HI , TrustedRegs: W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>)
// CHECK-NEXT: After detailed src register safety analysis:
// CHECK-NEXT: Binary Function "clobber" {
// ...
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ clobber:
// Iterating over the reports and attaching clobbering info:
// CHECK-EMPTY:
-// CHECK-NEXT: Attaching clobbering info to: 00000000: ret # DataflowSrcSafetyAnalysis: src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: BitVector, TrustedRegs: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>
+// CHECK-NEXT: Attaching clobbering info to: 00000000: ret # DataflowSrcSafetyAnalysis: src-state<SafeToDerefRegs: BitVector, TrustedRegs: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>
.globl nocfg
.type nocfg,@function
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ auth_oracle:
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: DstSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext( ret x30, dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: , Insts: [0]()>)
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: .. result: (dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: LR W30 W30_HI , Insts: [0]()>)
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: DstSafetyAnalysis::ComputeNext( autia x0, x1, dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: LR W30 W30_HI , Insts: [0]()>)
-// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: .. result: (dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: LR W30 W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>)
+// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: .. result: (dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: LR W30 W30_HI , Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>)
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: After detailed dst register safety analysis:
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: Binary Function "auth_oracle" {
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: Number : 4
@@ -325,14 +325,14 @@ auth_oracle:
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: }
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: [[BB0]] (2 instructions, align : 1)
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: Entry Point
-// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: 00000000: autia x0, x1 # DataflowDstSafetyAnalysis: dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>
+// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: 00000000: autia x0, x1 # DataflowDstSafetyAnalysis: dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: 00000004: ret # DataflowDstSafetyAnalysis: dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: BitVector, Insts: [0]()>
// AUTH-ORACLES-EMPTY:
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: DWARF CFI Instructions:
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: <empty>
// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: End of Function "auth_oracle"
// AUTH-ORACLES-EMPTY:
-// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: Attaching leakage info to: 00000000: autia x0, x1 # DataflowDstSafetyAnalysis: dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} )>
+// AUTH-ORACLES-NEXT: Attaching leakage info to: 00000000: autia x0, x1 # DataflowDstSafetyAnalysis: dst-state<CannotEscapeUnchecked: BitVector, Insts: [0](0x{{[0-9a-f]+}})>
// Gadget scanner should not crash on CFI instructions, including when debug-printing them.
// Note that the particular debug output is not checked, but BOLT should be
|
d6536f2
to
9ef4b06
Compare
cbf7911
to
7a71b56
Compare
648a25c
to
d0603f2
Compare
129f08e
to
fb4ed5b
Compare
d0603f2
to
f329a7a
Compare
fb4ed5b
to
73ccf1f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, these all look like little nice cleanups :)
f329a7a
to
63bb5f8
Compare
73ccf1f
to
06a5692
Compare
63bb5f8
to
9e5d66a
Compare
06a5692
to
3690b20
Compare
9e5d66a
to
848258c
Compare
e62d4e4
to
d7b3047
Compare
848258c
to
12320f0
Compare
d7b3047
to
ea232e9
Compare
12320f0
to
8d63466
Compare
ea232e9
to
e5f8494
Compare
8d63466
to
3ac1bf1
Compare
e5f8494
to
50b151e
Compare
3ac1bf1
to
82b3b3a
Compare
Perform trivial syntactical cleanups: * make use of structured binding declarations * use LLVM utility functions when appropriate * omit braces around single expression inside single-line LLVM_DEBUG() This patch is NFC aside from minor debug output changes.
82b3b3a
to
c03c503
Compare
…lvm#141665) Perform trivial syntactical cleanups: - make use of structured binding declarations - use LLVM utility functions when appropriate - omit braces around single expression inside single-line LLVM_DEBUG() This patch is NFC aside from minor debug output changes.
Perform trivial syntactical cleanups:
This patch is NFC aside from minor debug output changes.