-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
[lldb][DWARFASTParserClang] GetCXXObjectParameter to take DeclContext DIE parameter #144876
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[lldb][DWARFASTParserClang] GetCXXObjectParameter to take DeclContext DIE parameter #144876
Conversation
… DIE parameter I'm trying to call `GetCXXObjectParameter` from unit-tests in a follow-up patch and taking a `DWARFDIE` instead of `clang::DeclContext` makes that much simpler. These should be equivalent, since all we're trying to check is that the parent context is a record type.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Michael Buch (Michael137) ChangesI'm trying to call Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144876.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp
index 620501b304e63..7fc1d70898d1d 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp
@@ -163,14 +163,14 @@ static bool TagIsRecordType(dw_tag_t tag) {
/// a default DWARFDIE. If \c containing_decl_ctx is not a valid
/// C++ declaration context for class methods, assume no object
/// parameter exists for the given \c subprogram.
-static DWARFDIE
-GetCXXObjectParameter(const DWARFDIE &subprogram,
- const clang::DeclContext &containing_decl_ctx) {
+static DWARFDIE GetCXXObjectParameter(const DWARFDIE &subprogram,
+ const DWARFDIE &decl_ctx_die) {
+ assert(subprogram);
assert(subprogram.Tag() == DW_TAG_subprogram ||
subprogram.Tag() == DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine ||
subprogram.Tag() == DW_TAG_subroutine_type);
- if (!DeclKindIsCXXClass(containing_decl_ctx.getDeclKind()))
+ if (!decl_ctx_die.IsStructUnionOrClass())
return {};
if (DWARFDIE object_parameter =
@@ -1304,8 +1304,7 @@ DWARFASTParserClang::ParseSubroutine(const DWARFDIE &die,
clang::CallingConv calling_convention =
ConvertDWARFCallingConventionToClang(attrs);
- const DWARFDIE object_parameter =
- GetCXXObjectParameter(die, *containing_decl_ctx);
+ const DWARFDIE object_parameter = GetCXXObjectParameter(die, decl_ctx_die);
// clang_type will get the function prototype clang type after this
// call
@@ -2411,12 +2410,13 @@ DWARFASTParserClang::ConstructDemangledNameFromDWARF(const DWARFDIE &die) {
DWARFDeclContext decl_ctx = die.GetDWARFDeclContext();
sstr << decl_ctx.GetQualifiedName();
+ DWARFDIE decl_ctx_die;
clang::DeclContext *containing_decl_ctx =
- GetClangDeclContextContainingDIE(die, nullptr);
+ GetClangDeclContextContainingDIE(die, &decl_ctx_die);
assert(containing_decl_ctx);
- const unsigned cv_quals = GetCXXMethodCVQuals(
- die, GetCXXObjectParameter(die, *containing_decl_ctx));
+ const unsigned cv_quals =
+ GetCXXMethodCVQuals(die, GetCXXObjectParameter(die, decl_ctx_die));
ParseChildParameters(containing_decl_ctx, die, is_variadic,
has_template_params, param_types, param_names);
|
…l it from unit-tests My goal is to remove the `object_pointer` member on `ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes` since it's duplicating information that we retrieve with `GetCXXObjectParameter` anyway. To continue having coverage for the `DW_AT_object_pointer` code-paths, instead of checking the `attrs.object_pointer` I'm now calling `GetCXXObjectParameter` directly. We could find some very roundabout way to go via the Clang AST to check that the object parameter was parsed correctly, but that quickly became quite painful. Depends on llvm#144876
…l it from unit-tests (#144879) My goal is to remove the `object_pointer` member on `ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes` since it's duplicating information that we retrieve with `GetCXXObjectParameter` anyway. To continue having coverage for the `DW_AT_object_pointer` code-paths, instead of checking the `attrs.object_pointer` I'm now calling `GetCXXObjectParameter` directly. We could find some very roundabout way to go via the Clang AST to check that the object parameter was parsed correctly, but that quickly became quite painful. Depends on #144876
…lic and call it from unit-tests (#144879) My goal is to remove the `object_pointer` member on `ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes` since it's duplicating information that we retrieve with `GetCXXObjectParameter` anyway. To continue having coverage for the `DW_AT_object_pointer` code-paths, instead of checking the `attrs.object_pointer` I'm now calling `GetCXXObjectParameter` directly. We could find some very roundabout way to go via the Clang AST to check that the object parameter was parsed correctly, but that quickly became quite painful. Depends on llvm/llvm-project#144876
I'm trying to call
GetCXXObjectParameter
from unit-tests in a follow-up patch and taking aDWARFDIE
instead ofclang::DeclContext
makes that much simpler. These should be equivalent, since all we're trying to check is that the parent context is a record type.