Update Architecture.rst #225
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Minor edits
|
This repository does not accept pull requests. Please follow http://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html#how-to-submit-a-patch for contribution to LLVM. |
ghost
referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
mutateStrictFPToFP can delete the node and replace it with another with the same value which can later cause problems, and returning the result of mutateStrictFPToFP doesn't work because SelectionDAGLegalize expects that the returned value has the same number of results as the original. Instead handle things by doing the mutation manually. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74726 (cherry picked from commit 594a89f)
ghost
referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
Summary: When using strict fp, it is required to update the chain when performing integer type promotion of a operand to a integer to floating point conversion. Reviewers: craig.topper, john.brawn Reviewed By: craig.topper Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74597 (cherry picked from commit 8bc790f)
ghost
referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
If the target has FP64 but not FP16 then we have custom lowering for FP_EXTEND and STRICT_FP_EXTEND with type f64. However if the extend is from f32 to f64 the current implementation will cause in infinite loop for STRICT_FP_EXTEND due to emitting a merge_values of the original node which after replacement becomes a merge_values of itself. Fix this by not doing anything for f32 to f64 extend when we have FP64, though for STRICT_FP_EXTEND we have to do the strict-to-nonstrict mutation as that doesn't happen automatically for opcodes with custom lowering. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74559 (cherry picked from commit 0ec5797)
ghost
referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
These get lowered to function calls, like the non-strict versions. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73784 (cherry picked from commit 68cf574)
ghost
referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
and document the shortcomings of LLDB's partially defined DW_OP_piece handling. This would manifest as "DW_OP_piece for offset foo but top of stack is of size bar". rdar://problem/46262998 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72880 (cherry picked from commit f55ab6f)
ghost
referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2020
The use of the `&& ...` fold expression in std::array's deduction guides recursively builds a set of binary operator expressions of depth N where `N` is the number of elements in the initializer. This is problematic because arrays may be large, and instantiation depth is limited. This patch addresses the issue by flattening the SFINAE using the existing `__all` type trait. (cherry picked from commit c6eb584)
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Minor edits