Skip to content

Conversation

martinboehme
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure why we had this originally, but the function seems to have a pretty
onerous contract anyway for a function that is externally available, so it seems
better not to keep it around.

I'm not sure why we had this originally, but the function seems to have a pretty
onerous contract anyway for a function that is externally available, so it seems
better not to keep it around.
@martinboehme martinboehme requested a review from a team as a code owner September 7, 2023 12:56
@github-actions github-actions bot added the clang:dataflow Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html label Sep 7, 2023
@martinboehme martinboehme merged commit 2757085 into llvm:main Sep 11, 2023
ZijunZhaoCCK pushed a commit to ZijunZhaoCCK/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
I'm not sure why we had this originally, but the function seems to have
a pretty
onerous contract anyway for a function that is externally available, so
it seems
better not to keep it around.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:dataflow Clang Dataflow Analysis framework - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowAnalysisIntro.html
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants