Reapply "[RISCV] Support RISCV Atomics ABI attributes (#84597)" #90266
Conversation
Created using spr 1.3.4
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support Author: Paul Kirth (ilovepi) ChangesThis patch adds support for the atomic_abi attribute, specifid in The atomics_abi tag merging is conducted as follows: UNKNOWN is safe to merge with all other values. This was previously reverted due to ld.bfd segfaulting w/ unknown riscv Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90266.diff 10 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp b/lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp
index 20088d92bafa2f..7b9c9c6c6c3852 100644
--- a/lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp
+++ b/lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp
@@ -1084,10 +1084,62 @@ static void mergeArch(RISCVISAInfo::OrderedExtensionMap &mergedExts,
}
}
+static void mergeAtomic(DenseMap<unsigned, unsigned>::iterator it,
+ const InputSectionBase *oldSection,
+ const InputSectionBase *newSection, unsigned int oldTag,
+ unsigned int newTag) {
+ using RISCVAttrs::RISCVAtomicAbiTag::AtomicABI;
+ // Same tags stay the same, and UNKNOWN is compatible with anything
+ if (oldTag == newTag || newTag == AtomicABI::UNKNOWN)
+ return;
+
+ switch (oldTag) {
+ case AtomicABI::UNKNOWN:
+ it->getSecond() = newTag;
+ return;
+ case AtomicABI::A6C:
+ switch (newTag) {
+ case AtomicABI::A6S:
+ it->getSecond() = AtomicABI::A6C;
+ return;
+ case AtomicABI::A7:
+ error(toString(oldSection) + " has atomic_abi=" + Twine(oldTag) +
+ " but " + toString(newSection) +
+ " has atomic_abi=" + Twine(newTag));
+ return;
+ };
+
+ case AtomicABI::A6S:
+ switch (newTag) {
+ case AtomicABI::A6C:
+ it->getSecond() = AtomicABI::A6C;
+ return;
+ case AtomicABI::A7:
+ it->getSecond() = AtomicABI::A7;
+ return;
+ };
+
+ case AtomicABI::A7:
+ switch (newTag) {
+ case AtomicABI::A6S:
+ it->getSecond() = AtomicABI::A7;
+ return;
+ case AtomicABI::A6C:
+ error(toString(oldSection) + " has atomic_abi=" + Twine(oldTag) +
+ " but " + toString(newSection) +
+ " has atomic_abi=" + Twine(newTag));
+ return;
+ };
+ default:
+ llvm_unreachable("unknown AtomicABI");
+ };
+}
+
static RISCVAttributesSection *
mergeAttributesSection(const SmallVector<InputSectionBase *, 0> §ions) {
RISCVISAInfo::OrderedExtensionMap exts;
const InputSectionBase *firstStackAlign = nullptr;
+ const InputSectionBase *firstAtomicAbi = nullptr;
unsigned firstStackAlignValue = 0, xlen = 0;
bool hasArch = false;
@@ -1134,6 +1186,17 @@ mergeAttributesSection(const SmallVector<InputSectionBase *, 0> §ions) {
case RISCVAttrs::PRIV_SPEC_MINOR:
case RISCVAttrs::PRIV_SPEC_REVISION:
break;
+
+ case llvm::RISCVAttrs::AttrType::ATOMIC_ABI:
+ if (auto i = parser.getAttributeValue(tag.attr)) {
+ auto r = merged.intAttr.try_emplace(tag.attr, *i);
+ if (r.second) {
+ firstAtomicAbi = sec;
+ } else {
+ mergeAtomic(r.first, firstAtomicAbi, sec, r.first->getSecond(), *i);
+ }
+ }
+ continue;
}
// Fallback for deprecated priv_spec* and other unknown attributes: retain
diff --git a/lld/test/ELF/riscv-attributes.s b/lld/test/ELF/riscv-attributes.s
index d0ce0941269ec4..77c2c3cb263fd1 100644
--- a/lld/test/ELF/riscv-attributes.s
+++ b/lld/test/ELF/riscv-attributes.s
@@ -44,6 +44,39 @@
# RUN: not ld.lld a.o b.o c.o diff_stack_align.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STACK_ALIGN --implicit-check-not=error:
# STACK_ALIGN: error: diff_stack_align.o:(.riscv.attributes) has stack_align=32 but a.o:(.riscv.attributes) has stack_align=16
+## merging atomic_abi values for A6C and A7 lead to an error.
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 atomic_abi_A6C.s -o atomic_abi_A6C.o
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 atomic_abi_A7.s -o atomic_abi_A7.o
+# RUN: not ld.lld atomic_abi_A6C.o atomic_abi_A7.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ATOMIC_ABI_ERROR --implicit-check-not=error:
+# ATOMIC_ABI_ERROR: error: atomic_abi_A6C.o:(.riscv.attributes) has atomic_abi=1 but atomic_abi_A7.o:(.riscv.attributes) has atomic_abi=3
+
+
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 atomic_abi_A6S.s -o atomic_abi_A6S.o
+# RUN: ld.lld atomic_abi_A6S.o atomic_abi_A6C.o -o atomic_abi_A6C_A6S
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A6C_A6S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=A6C_A6S
+
+# RUN: ld.lld atomic_abi_A6S.o atomic_abi_A7.o -o atomic_abi_A6S_A7
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A6S_A7 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=A6S_A7
+
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 atomic_abi_unknown.s -o atomic_abi_unknown.o
+# RUN: ld.lld atomic_abi_unknown.o atomic_abi_A6C.o -o atomic_abi_A6C_unknown
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A6C_unknown | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=UNKNOWN_A6C
+
+# RUN: ld.lld atomic_abi_unknown.o diff_stack_align.o -o atomic_abi_none_unknown
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_none_unknown | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=UNKNOWN_NONE
+
+# RUN: ld.lld diff_stack_align.o atomic_abi_A6C.o -o atomic_abi_A6C_none
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A6C_none | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=NONE_A6C
+
+# RUN: ld.lld atomic_abi_unknown.o atomic_abi_A6S.o -o atomic_abi_A6S_unknown
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A6S_unknown | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=UNKNOWN_A6S
+
+# RUN: ld.lld atomic_abi_unknown.o atomic_abi_A7.o -o atomic_abi_A7_unknown
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A7_unknown | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=UNKNOWN_A7
+
+# RUN: ld.lld diff_stack_align.o atomic_abi_A7.o -o atomic_abi_A7_none
+# RUN: llvm-readobj -A atomic_abi_A7_none | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NONE_A7
+
## The deprecated priv_spec is not handled as GNU ld does.
## Differing priv_spec attributes lead to an absent attribute.
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=riscv64 diff_priv_spec.s -o diff_priv_spec.o
@@ -286,6 +319,175 @@
.attribute priv_spec, 3
.attribute priv_spec_minor, 3
+#--- atomic_abi_unknown.s
+.attribute atomic_abi, 0
+
+#--- atomic_abi_A6C.s
+.attribute atomic_abi, 1
+
+#--- atomic_abi_A6S.s
+.attribute atomic_abi, 2
+
+#--- atomic_abi_A7.s
+.attribute atomic_abi, 3
+
+# UNKNOWN_NONE: BuildAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: SectionLength: 17
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Size: 7
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Attribute {
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Tag: 4
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Value: 32
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: TagName: stack_align
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: Description: Stack alignment is 32-bytes
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_NONE-NEXT: }
+
+# NONE_A6C: BuildAttributes {
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: SectionLength: 19
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Size: 9
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Attribute {
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Value: 1
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 1
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Attribute {
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Tag: 4
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Value: 32
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: TagName: stack_align
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: Description: Stack alignment is 32-bytes
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A6C-NEXT: }
+
+# UNKNOWN_A6C: BuildAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: SectionLength: 17
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Size: 7
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Attribute {
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Value: 1
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 1
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A6C-NEXT: }
+
+# UNKNOWN_A6S: BuildAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: SectionLength:
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Size: 7
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Attribute {
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Value: 2
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 2
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A6S-NEXT: }
+
+# NONE_A7: BuildAttributes {
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: SectionLength: 19
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Size: 9
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Attribute {
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Value: 3
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 3
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Attribute {
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Tag: 4
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Value: 32
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: TagName: stack_align
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: Description: Stack alignment is 32-bytes
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: }
+# NONE_A7-NEXT: }
+
+
+# UNKNOWN_A7: BuildAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: SectionLength: 17
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Size: 7
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Attribute {
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Value: 3
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 3
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: }
+# UNKNOWN_A7-NEXT: }
+
+# A6C_A6S: BuildAttributes {
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: SectionLength: 17
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Size: 7
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Attribute {
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Value: 1
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 1
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: }
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: }
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: }
+# A6C_A6S-NEXT: }
+
+# A6S_A7: BuildAttributes {
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: FormatVersion: 0x41
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Section 1 {
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: SectionLength: 17
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Vendor: riscv
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Tag: Tag_File (0x1)
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Size: 7
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: FileAttributes {
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Attribute {
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Tag: 14
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Value: 3
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: TagName: atomic_abi
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: Description: Atomic ABI is 3
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: }
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: }
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: }
+# A6S_A7-NEXT: }
+
#--- unknown13.s
.attribute 13, "0"
#--- unknown13a.s
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.h
index 305adffbe851e7..9f295504de959e 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ class RISCVAttributeParser : public ELFAttributeParser {
Error unalignedAccess(unsigned tag);
Error stackAlign(unsigned tag);
+ Error atomicAbi(unsigned tag);
public:
RISCVAttributeParser(ScopedPrinter *sw)
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributes.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributes.h
index 18f5a84d21f250..5def890a727355 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributes.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/RISCVAttributes.h
@@ -32,8 +32,21 @@ enum AttrType : unsigned {
PRIV_SPEC = 8,
PRIV_SPEC_MINOR = 10,
PRIV_SPEC_REVISION = 12,
+ ATOMIC_ABI = 14,
};
+namespace RISCVAtomicAbiTag {
+enum AtomicABI : unsigned {
+ // Values for Tag_RISCV_atomic_abi
+ // Defined at
+ // https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc#tag_riscv_atomic_abi-14-uleb128version
+ UNKNOWN = 0,
+ A6C = 1,
+ A6S = 2,
+ A7 = 3,
+};
+} // namespace RISCVAtomicAbiTag
+
enum { NOT_ALLOWED = 0, ALLOWED = 1 };
} // namespace RISCVAttrs
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.cpp b/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.cpp
index 7ce4b6ab161cd3..19c5a0e06903f6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributeParser.cpp
@@ -36,7 +36,18 @@ const RISCVAttributeParser::DisplayHandler
{
RISCVAttrs::UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
&RISCVAttributeParser::unalignedAccess,
- }};
+ },
+ {
+ RISCVAttrs::ATOMIC_ABI,
+ &RISCVAttributeParser::atomicAbi,
+ },
+};
+
+Error RISCVAttributeParser::atomicAbi(unsigned Tag) {
+ uint64_t Value = de.getULEB128(cursor);
+ printAttribute(Tag, Value, "Atomic ABI is " + utostr(Value));
+ return Error::success();
+}
Error RISCVAttributeParser::unalignedAccess(unsigned tag) {
static const char *strings[] = {"No unaligned access", "Unaligned access"};
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributes.cpp b/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributes.cpp
index 9e629760d3d842..dc70d65acba063 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributes.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Support/RISCVAttributes.cpp
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ static constexpr TagNameItem tagData[] = {
{PRIV_SPEC, "Tag_priv_spec"},
{PRIV_SPEC_MINOR, "Tag_priv_spec_minor"},
{PRIV_SPEC_REVISION, "Tag_priv_spec_revision"},
+ {ATOMIC_ABI, "Tag_atomic_abi"},
};
constexpr TagNameMap RISCVAttributeTags{tagData};
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp
index 0f92e9ed6a64d3..6f5f12cc72862d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp
@@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ void RISCVTargetStreamer::emitTargetAttributes(const MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
auto &ISAInfo = *ParseResult;
emitTextAttribute(RISCVAttrs::ARCH, ISAInfo->toString());
}
+
+ if (STI.hasFeature(RISCV::FeatureStdExtA)) {
+ unsigned AtomicABITag = STI.hasFeature(RISCV::FeatureTrailingSeqCstFence)
+ ? RISCVAttrs::RISCVAtomicAbiTag::AtomicABI::A6S
+ : RISCVAttrs::RISCVAtomicAbiTag::AtomicABI::A6C;
+ emitAttribute(RISCVAttrs::ATOMIC_ABI, AtomicABITag);
+ }
}
// This part is for ascii assembly output
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/attributes.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/attributes.ll
index 141d5ea4182892..1aff3e8b83f401 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/attributes.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/attributes.ll
@@ -129,7 +129,8 @@
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+m %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64M %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+zmmul %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64ZMMUL %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+m,+zmmul %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64MZMMUL %s
-; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+a %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64A %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+a %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64A,A6C %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+a,+seq-cst-trailing-fence %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64A,A6S %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+f %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64F %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+d %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64D %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+c %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK,RV64C %s
@@ -516,3 +517,10 @@ define i32 @addi(i32 %a) {
%1 = add i32 %a, 1
ret i32 %1
}
+
+define i8 @atomic_load_i8_seq_cst(ptr %a) nounwind {
+ %1 = load atomic i8, ptr %a seq_cst, align 1
+ ret i8 %1
+; A6S: .attribute 14, 2
+; A6C: .attribute 14, 1
+}
diff --git a/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/attribute.s b/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/attribute.s
index 56f0cb1daf176f..75b9c65ed1cc2f 100644
--- a/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/attribute.s
+++ b/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/attribute.s
@@ -24,3 +24,6 @@
.attribute priv_spec_revision, 0
# CHECK: attribute 12, 0
+
+.attribute atomic_abi, 0
+# CHECK: attribute 14, 0
diff --git a/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/invalid-attribute.s b/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/invalid-attribute.s
index 1d732af83cda35..2ebf7ddc9aff85 100644
--- a/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/invalid-attribute.s
+++ b/llvm/test/MC/RISCV/invalid-attribute.s
@@ -33,3 +33,6 @@
.attribute arch, 30
# CHECK: [[@LINE-1]]:18: error: expected string constant
+
+.attribute atomic_abi, "16"
+# CHECK: [[@LINE-1]]:24: error: expected numeric constant
|
|
Note, I'm not sure what the time table for this to reland is. |
|
Seems like @MaskRay reported the bfd bug quite a while ago. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29823 |
Hopefully @Nelson1225 can take a look. As we add more build attributes, The GNU ld error suggests the atomic attribute should be opt-in. On the LLVM side, we can have a |
lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp
Outdated
| if (auto i = parser.getAttributeValue(tag.attr)) { | ||
| auto r = merged.intAttr.try_emplace(tag.attr, *i); | ||
| if (r.second) { | ||
| firstAtomicAbi = sec; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no braces for one-line single statements
see other comments in #84597
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah I missed that. Thanks.
I'm not sure I follow, are you refering to the current ToT GNU ld behavior or the segfault reported? Second, the psABI isn't ambiguous about the requirement here https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc#tag_riscv_atomic_abi-14-uleb128version, and the merge policy is clearly spelled out The wording there doesn't sound optional to me.
I don't think this is very practical. CL opts are probably not enough, and tend to cause issues, particularly when they don't get forwarded to the linker correctly in LTO builds.
I'm not aware of any reason we need to maintain strict compatibility w/ GCC at all points in time, when we're all supposed to be implementing the same spec. Note: I'm not saying we shouldn't maintain compatibility at all, but I don't see why Clang can't be leading the way here. Also, whether we emit attributes or not, doesn't seem to be the kind of thing you should control w/ a driver option if its mandated by the ABI you're targeting. Lastly, I'd like to emphasize, enabling the correct Atomics ABI has been blocked on this feature for a long time. This is required for Android and other systems that do not want to maintain any compatibility with the old/broken A6C ABI, since A6C and A7 are completely incompatible. |
Created using spr 1.3.4
Created using spr 1.3.4
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
I think one reason we'd go with this route is it would make it easy for people to have a downstream patch that flips the default, while having the logic upstream and at least minimally tested. Not ideal, but it's a pattern we've followed before. Anyway, let's discuss a path forwards in the call today. I agree we could go overboard on maintaining strict compatibility at all times, but the segfault with what was until recently the most current ld release is fairly user hostile. There aren't any great solutions here I think, we just have to find the least-worst :/ |
Created using spr 1.3.4
|
Ping. Are we happy w/ this as an |
Sorry, I'd missed the update somehow. I'd actually been thinking a cl::opt flag (much like AArch64 has aarch64-mark-bti-property). I'd say the Unless anyone else feels differently I'd think the cl::opt is most consistent with how we usually do this (and easy to pass through from clang with |
Sounds good. I’ll try to send an update later today. |
The trend of liberally including attributes in .riscv.attributes raises concerns. I'll likely be more concerned if a future linker option is proposed to suppress incompatibility errors.
I don't think we should read too much from the use of "should" here. This requirement level is probably between "should" and "may". RFC2119
Using
A |
Created using spr 1.3.4
|
Sorry for the delay on this. I lost track of this w/ other priorities. I think the new implementation does what everyone wants it to do: guard codegen w/ the |
I'm also coming into this late, triggered by the attempt to make TSO non-experimental. This is all interconnected. Having the attribute emission off by default under a CL opt seems like a reasonable stepping stone. We could maybe be fancy here in the future and do linker version sniffing, but I'm 100% in support of starting simple. LGTM to that bit, and assuming other comments on resolved from previous landing - I did not check - please reland.
I think we should enable the A6S ("A6/7 compat") by default, even if we can't emit the attribute. The whole attribute mechanism is fairly badly thought out - as the very revert here shows - and should not block the major item of getting us migrated to the same ABI variant used by gcc. |
Once this lands, I don't think there are any blockers to #90267, which enables A6S. I've wanted that to be te default atomic ABI for a long time now. |
|
@MaskRay does the current implementation address your remaining concerns? If so, then I'll go ahead and land this to unblock the TSO work. |
lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp
Outdated
| it->getSecond() = AtomicABI::A6C; | ||
| return; | ||
| case AtomicABI::A7: | ||
| errorOrWarn(toString(oldSection) + " has atomic_abi=" + Twine(oldTag) + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have similar diagnostics in two places. One is OutputSections.cpp:127. Follow its style?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hmm, I followed the diagnostic style for STACK_ALIGN originally, but I've kind of split the difference between the OutputSections diagnostic and this one. Happy to amend again.
lld/ELF/Arch/RISCV.cpp
Outdated
| it->getSecond() = AtomicABI::A7; | ||
| return; | ||
| case AtomicABI::A6C: | ||
| errorOrWarn(toString(oldSection) + " has atomic_abi=" + Twine(oldTag) + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This introduces some duplicate. Extract to a lambda
| static cl::opt<bool> | ||
| RiscvAbiAttr("riscv-abi-attributes", | ||
| cl::desc("Enable emitting RISC-V ELF attributes for ABI features"), | ||
| cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); |
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace RISCVAtomicAbiTag { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
scoped enum (enum class) is better than namespace+unscoped enum
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've followed your advice here, but this seems to require quite a lot of static_casting when what we actually want is a typed alias for an integer which is precisely what a standard enum type is. I've also had to introduce what I'd say are useless cases to the switch for unreachable types we've already checked.
Created using spr 1.3.4
Created using spr 1.3.4
Created using spr 1.3.4
Created using spr 1.3.4
|
Since we're going to have the flag emission under a flag anyways, can we separate the LLD part into a separate review? Doing so would seem to unblock the compiler side changes, and let the LLD review comments move at their own pace. |
Created using spr 1.3.4
Done. LLD support is in #97347 |
| static cl::opt<bool> RiscvAbiAttr( | ||
| "riscv-abi-attributes", | ||
| cl::desc("Enable emitting RISC-V ELF attributes for ABI features"), | ||
| cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
remove cl::init(false), the convention is to omit default false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ugh, I forgot to fix that after I fixed up a bad merge. Thanks for noticing that.
Created using spr 1.3.4
ilovepi
deleted the
users/ilovepi/spr/reapply-riscv-support-riscv-atomics-abi-attributes-84597
branch
This patch adds support for the atomic_abi attribute, specifid in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc#tag_riscv_atomic_abi-14-uleb128version. This was previously reverted due to ld.bfd segfaulting w/ unknown riscv attributes. Attribute emission is now guarded by a backend flag `--riscv-abi-attributes`, which is off by default. Linker support in LLD for attribute merging is now in a standalone patch. Reviewers: kito-cheng, MaskRay, asb Reviewed By: MaskRay Pull Request: llvm#90266
This patch adds support for the atomic_abi attribute, specifid in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc#tag_riscv_atomic_abi-14-uleb128version. This was previously reverted due to ld.bfd segfaulting w/ unknown riscv attributes. Attribute emission is now guarded by a backend flag `--riscv-abi-attributes`, which is off by default. Linker support in LLD for attribute merging is now in a standalone patch. Reviewers: kito-cheng, MaskRay, asb Reviewed By: MaskRay Pull Request: llvm#90266
This patch adds support for merging the atomic_abi attribute, specified in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc#tag_riscv_atomic_abi-14-uleb128version, to LLD. The atomics_abi tag merging is conducted as follows: UNKNOWN is safe to merge with all other values. A6C is compatible with A6S, and results in the A6C ABI. A6C is incompatible with A7, and results in an error. A6S and A7 are compatible, and merging results in the A7 ABI. Note: the A7 is not yet supported in either LLVM or in any current hardware, and is therefore omitted from attribute generation in RISCVTargetStreamer. LLD support was split from #90266
This patch adds support for the atomic_abi attribute, specifid in
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc#tag_riscv_atomic_abi-14-uleb128version.
This was previously reverted due to ld.bfd segfaulting w/ unknown riscv
attributes. Attribute emission is now guarded by a backend flag
--riscv-abi-attributes, which is off by default. Linker support inLLD for attribute merging is now in a standalone patch.