Update CI actions and replace unmaintained actions

[dunxen]

• All actions-rs actions are unmaintained, so we'll use dtolnay's rust-toolchain action and just manually run the cargo action commands as well as cargo audit.
• I've also regenerated release-related workflow with cargo-dist v0.18.0

This should get rid of a bunch of warnings in the actions logs related to node 16 as well, I believe.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (5535413) to head (8fc2c32).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #141   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files           1       1           
  Lines          97      97           
======================================
  Misses         97      97           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[orbitalturtle]

Looks good to me! Thanks for keeping these updated. 🙏🏻 So has dtolnay's project become the de facto alternative? I'm just curious if there's a splintering in the community over what to use.

[dunxen]

So has dtolnay's project become the de facto alternative? I'm just curious if there's a splintering in the community over what to use.

Yeah I couldn't find a fork of the actions-rs org and it seems most are moving to dtolnay's action from PRs linked to this issue: actions-rs/toolchain#216.

If rustup is available on the image we could also just manually install cargo stable.

[orbitalturtle]

Yeah I couldn't find a fork of the actions-rs org and it seems most are moving to dtolnay's action from PRs linked to this issue: actions-rs/toolchain#216.

Ahh I see, also it looks like it's "used by" 28k projects according to the github repository home page and he kind of won me over a bit with this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/vyx4oj/comment/ig54zv7/. The main problem people seem to have from scanning the comments is it doesn't support very complex features, which isn't a problem for us, so I'd be down to use it