-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
27 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: pr | ||
date: 2024-04-18 | ||
title: "don't use sweeper unconfirmed utxos" | ||
pr: 8545 | ||
authors: [ziggie1984] | ||
components: ["utxo sweeping"] | ||
host: ziggie1984 | ||
status: upcoming | ||
commit: | ||
--- | ||
|
||
## General questions about Lightning Channel Openings in LND: | ||
|
||
- What are the different ways of funding a lightning channel in LND (creating the funding transaction)? Think of possible use-cases for the different methods (e.g. the internal LND wallet). | ||
- What does the batch channel opening cmd use to open channels, does it use the internal wallet? | ||
- What would be needed to implement BatchChannelClosings, are they even possible today without protocol changes? | ||
- Explain the concept of a “zero-conf" channel and outline what a good use-case might be. | ||
|
||
## PR Related Questions | ||
|
||
- What’s the underlying problem this PR is trying to solve. | ||
- Can a transaction not signalling RBF (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0125.mediawiki rule 1) be RBFed, if so how? | ||
- What is the subsystem which tends to RBF outputs. When would this subsystem try to RBF an output (walk through a likely example). | ||
- What happens to a zero-conf channel which inputs are RBFed (before the channel funding transaction is confirmed) | ||
- Is it currently possible to close such a channel (coop-close or force-close)? | ||
- Does this PR solve the RBF issue completely for channel-openings or are further improvements planed. |