Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change active_id to t_component pointer #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

gustavosr8
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gustavosr8 gustavosr8 force-pushed the bit-field-component branch 3 times, most recently from 971f49b to 9bddd92 Compare June 28, 2023 17:26
@augustofg
Copy link
Member

Please format the commit message to avoid lines > 72 characters. Also separate the summary from the explanation.

Treat the component selector as a bit field as specified in the
MicroTCA documentation. change active_id to t_component pointer.
@gustavosr8 gustavosr8 force-pushed the bit-field-component branch from 327a76b to a9cf0f0 Compare June 30, 2023 17:09
@augustofg
Copy link
Member

👍

@augustofg augustofg merged commit f06f69f into devel Jun 30, 2023
@augustofg augustofg deleted the bit-field-component branch June 30, 2023 17:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Field 'components' is interpreted as a index instead of a bit field during HPM commands
2 participants