Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List additional resolvers for geotrellis-contrib-{vlm|gdal} as a Scala build requirement #324

Closed
metasim opened this issue Aug 29, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #341
Closed
Labels
documentation Documentation issues or updates

Comments

@metasim
Copy link
Member

metasim commented Aug 29, 2019

See:
https://gitter.im/locationtech/rasterframes?at=5d67a14b8051bf4db1ac27bf

This will only be temporary until that work is integrated into GeoTrellis 3.0.

@metasim metasim added the documentation Documentation issues or updates label Aug 29, 2019
metasim added a commit to s22s/rasterframes that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2019
metasim added a commit to s22s/rasterframes that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2019
* develop: (254 commits)
  Incorporated PR feedback.
  Make python RasterSourceTest.test_list_of_list_of_str clearer, more stable
  Propagate errors encountered in RasterSourceToRasterRefs. Closes locationtech#267.

  Updated release notes.
  Switched Explode tiles to use UnsafeRow for slight improvement on memory pressure. Reworked TileExplodeBench
  Changed CatalystSerialize implementations to store scheams as fields rather than methods.
  Benchmark and fix for CellType reification issue. Closes locationtech#343
  PR feedback edits.
  Fleshed out details on using Scala. Closes locationtech#324
  Fixes locationtech#338.
  Tweaked parquet I/O tests to trigger UDT issue.
  Normalize RasterSourceDataSource param names between python and SQL
  PR feedback
  Run python tile exploder test for projected raster
  Fix for locationtech#333 and additional tests in that vein.
  Add failing unit test for issue 333, error in rf_agg_local_mean
  Updated ExplodeTiles to work with proj_raster type.
  Ignoring RGB composite tests until next round of improvements.
  IT test build fix.
  Incremental work on refactoring aggregate raster creation.
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Documentation issues or updates
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant