cpp: fix some issues in the cpp implementation #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These changes are due to the ongoing port to Windows.
|
Please check this on Windows manually, just in case. |
lplewa
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2016
cpp: fix some issues in the cpp implementation
lplewa
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2016
As we have 6 jobs and 4 concurrent threads in Travis our job schedule is presented in the figure below: #1 ====== #2 ====== #3 ======================== #4 ======================== #5 ======================== #6 ====== a new order will look like this: #3 ======================== #4 ======================== #5 ======================== #1 ====== #2 ====== #6 ====== what give us '======' improvement (at the time of this commit it's ~13 min)
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2017
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2017
Use an escaped version of character #1 in the script, used as placeholder for comment sections in the parsed C source file input.
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2017
Scripts must start with #!/usr/bin/env <shell> for portability. Add set -e to top-level scripts. Add use warnings to perl scripts.
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2017
Tests #2/#3 are specifically for helgrind/drd tests. Test #1 should never be executed under valgrind, even if force-enabled via command-line options. Ref: pmem/issues#664
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2017
test: disable Valgrind in vmem_multiple_pools #1
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2017
Ref: pmem/issues#639 Ref: pmem/issues#665 Apparently valgrind just can't handle the way jemalloc uses mutexes across forks, as demonstrated by this dummy program: $ cat dummy.c pthread_mutex_t dummy = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; static void prefork(void) { pthread_mutex_lock(&dummy); } static void postfork_child(void) { pthread_mutexattr_t attr; if (pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr) != 0) abort(); if (pthread_mutex_init(&dummy, &attr) != 0) { pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&attr); abort(); } pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&attr); } static void postfork_parent(void) { pthread_mutex_unlock(&dummy); } int main() { pthread_atfork(prefork, postfork_parent, postfork_child); fork(); pthread_mutex_lock(&dummy); pthread_mutex_unlock(&dummy); } $ cc -pthread dummy.c -o dummy $ valgrind --tool=helgrind ./dummy 2>&1 | grep holds ==26890== Thread #1: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock $ valgrind --tool=drd ./dummy 2>&1 | grep -i mutex ==26898== Mutex reinitialization: mutex 0x30a040, recursion count 1, owner 1. ==26898== at 0x4C385F0: pthread_mutex_init ==26898== mutex 0x30a040 was first observed at: ==26898== at 0x4C390D3: pthread_mutex_lock ==26898== Recursive locking not allowed: mutex 0x30a040, recursion count 1, owner 1. ==26898== at 0x4C390D3: pthread_mutex_lock ==26898== mutex 0x30a040 was first observed at: ==26898== at 0x4C390D3: pthread_mutex_lock
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2018
Change meaning of expectation parameter in execute function.
lplewa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2019
test (py): generalize obj_basic_integration
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These changes are due to the ongoing port to Windows.
This change is