-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Communication
: Improve sidebar user interface design
#9356
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a significant refactor of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 26
Outside diff range comments (7)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-46
: Suggestions for improving component structure and navigation logicWhile the overall structure of the component is good, here are some suggestions for improvement:
The
refreshChildComponent
method uses complex navigation logic. Consider simplifying this or adding comments to explain the purpose of each step.The use of
skipLocationChange
followed by immediate navigation might be inefficient. Can this be optimized?Add error handling for the navigation promises to improve robustness:
this.router.navigate(['../'], { skipLocationChange: true, relativeTo: this.route.firstChild }) .then(() => { // ... existing code ... }) .catch(error => { console.error('Navigation failed:', error); // Handle the error appropriately });
Consider implementing lifecycle hooks like
ngOnInit
orngOnDestroy
if there's any initialization or cleanup logic needed.The
emitStoreAndRefresh
method name doesn't clearly indicate its full functionality. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive, likeemitEventAndRefreshView
.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.module.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-39
: Enhance readability of imports and declarations.The overall structure of the module looks good and aligns with Angular best practices. To further improve readability and maintainability, consider applying the same multi-line format to the imports and declarations arrays.
Here's an example of how you could format the imports and declarations:
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { ArtemisSharedModule, ArtemisSidePanelModule, ArtemisSharedPipesModule, ArtemisExerciseButtonsModule, ArtemisCourseExerciseRowModule, ArtemisSharedCommonModule, SubmissionResultStatusModule, ArtemisExamSharedModule, } from 'app/shared/...'; // Adjust the import paths as needed import { SidebarAccordionComponent, SidebarCardSmallComponent, SidebarCardMediumComponent, SidebarCardLargeComponent, SidebarCardItemComponent, SidebarComponent, ConversationOptionsComponent, } from './...'; // Adjust the import paths as needed @NgModule({ imports: [ ArtemisExerciseButtonsModule, ArtemisCourseExerciseRowModule, ArtemisSharedModule, ArtemisSharedPipesModule, ArtemisSidePanelModule, ArtemisSharedCommonModule, SubmissionResultStatusModule, SidebarCardDirective, ArtemisExamSharedModule, ], declarations: [ SidebarAccordionComponent, SidebarCardSmallComponent, SidebarCardMediumComponent, SidebarCardLargeComponent, SidebarCardItemComponent, SidebarComponent, ConversationOptionsComponent, ], // ... exports (as suggested in the previous comment) }) export class ArtemisSidebarModule {}This format improves readability and makes it easier to add or remove items in the future.
Also applies to: 41-42
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
12-30
: LGTM: Class properties updated to support new sidebar designThe changes to the class properties align well with the PR objectives:
- Removal of
showAddOptions
andshowAddOption
simplifies the component's interface.- Addition of
channelTypeIcon
supports the new channel prefix display logic.- New
isFilterActive
property likely supports the updated filtering behavior.The property naming follows the camelCase convention as per coding guidelines, and
@Input()
decorators are used correctly.Consider adding a type annotation to the
isFilterActive
property for consistency:@Input() isFilterActive: boolean = false;
Line range hint
32-72
: LGTM: Methods updated to support new sidebar functionalityThe changes to the methods align with the PR objectives:
- Removal of
getGroupKey
simplifies the component's logic.expandAll
method now considers theisFilterActive
property, supporting the new filtering behavior.The methods follow camelCase naming convention and use arrow function syntax as per coding guidelines. There are no apparent memory leaks.
For consistency with the coding guidelines, consider using single quotes for strings in the
setStoredCollapseState
andtoggleGroupCategoryCollapse
methods. For example:sessionStorage.setItem('sidebar.accordion.collapseState.' + this.storageId + '.byCourse.' + this.courseId, JSON.stringify(this.collapseState));src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-72
: Consider using consistent Angular syntax throughout the fileThe file currently uses a mix of
*ngIf
and the new@if
syntax for conditional rendering. For consistency and to align with modern Angular practices, consider updating all instances to use the new@if
syntax. This includes lines like:<div class="input-group mb-2 rounded-3 p-2 me-2 module-bg" [hidden]="!isCodeOfConductAccepted">which could be changed to:
@if (isCodeOfConductAccepted) { <div class="input-group mb-2 rounded-3 p-2 me-2 module-bg"> <!-- content --> </div> }Similarly, update other
*ngIf
instances throughout the file.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.ts (1)
Old Channel Creation Dialog Still Present
The method
openCreateChannelDialog
is still found incourse-conversations.component.ts
, indicating that the old channel creation dialog was not fully removed. Additionally, new channel creation methods likecreateChannel
andaddChannel
are present, but the presence of the old method suggests incomplete refactoring.
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts
:openCreateChannelDialog
Analysis chain
Line range hint
27-127
: LGTM! Verify new channel creation process.The removal of
otherChannels
,openCreateChannelDialog
, and theNgbModal
service from the constructor aligns with the PR objectives of simplifying the channel creation process and streamlining the UI. These changes suggest that the channel creation process is now handled differently, possibly through the new "Create Chat" and "Add Channel" buttons mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure that the new channel creation process is properly implemented, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify that the new channel creation process has been properly implemented across the relevant files in the project.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new channel creation process # Test 1: Check for the presence of new buttons in the template echo "Checking for new buttons in the template:" rg --type html 'Create Chat|Add Channel' src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/ # Test 2: Verify the removal of the old channel creation dialog echo "Verifying removal of old channel creation dialog:" rg --type typescript 'openCreateChannelDialog' src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/ # Test 3: Check for new methods related to channel creation echo "Checking for new channel creation methods:" rg --type typescript 'createChannel|addChannel' src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/Length of output: 659
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new channel creation process with corrected file types # Test 1: Check for the presence of new buttons in the template echo "Checking for new buttons in the template:" rg --type html 'Create Chat|Add Channel' src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/ # Test 2: Verify the removal of the old channel creation dialog echo "Verifying removal of old channel creation dialog:" rg --type ts 'openCreateChannelDialog' src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/ # Test 3: Check for new methods related to channel creation echo "Checking for new channel creation methods:" rg --type ts 'createChannel|addChannel' src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/Length of output: 4327
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion.component.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-148
: Overall, the test suite is comprehensive and well-structured.The test cases cover various aspects of the SidebarAccordionComponent's functionality, including toggling collapse states, handling search and filter changes, and expanding groups. The use of mocking and assertions is consistent with best practices and the provided coding guidelines.
However, considering the PR objectives mentioned in the summary, there might be an opportunity to enhance the test coverage:
- Add tests for the new "Create Chat" and "Add Channel" buttons and their dropdown menus.
- Verify that section headers are not visible when there are no channels or conversations in that section.
- Check that the prefixes "exercise-", "lecture-", and "exam-" are correctly handled in the main view and in the favorites and hidden sections.
These additions would ensure that the new features and changes are properly tested.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (32)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts (7 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/conversation-detail-dialog/tabs/conversation-settings/conversation-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options/accordion-add-options.component.html (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options/accordion-add-options.component.scss (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options/accordion-add-options.component.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-large/sidebar-card-large.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-large/sidebar-card-large.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card.directive.ts (2 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-event.service.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.scss (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.ts (3 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/types/sidebar.ts (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/de/conversation.json (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/de/student-dashboard.json (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/en/conversation.json (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/i18n/en/student-dashboard.json (1 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options.component.spec.ts (0 hunks)
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (6)
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options/accordion-add-options.component.html
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options/accordion-add-options.component.scss
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options/accordion-add-options.component.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-event.service.ts
- src/main/webapp/app/types/sidebar.ts
- src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/accordion-add-options.component.spec.ts
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (23)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/conversation-detail-dialog/tabs/conversation-settings/conversation-settings.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-large/sidebar-card-large.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-large/sidebar-card-large.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card.directive.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.html (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/**/*.html
: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.module.ts (1)
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/conversation.json (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/**/*.json
: German language translations should be informal (dutzen) and should never be formal (sietzen). So the user should always be addressed with "du/dein" and never with "sie/ihr".src/main/webapp/i18n/de/student-dashboard.json (1)
Pattern
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/**/*.json
: German language translations should be informal (dutzen) and should never be formal (sietzen). So the user should always be addressed with "du/dein" and never with "sie/ihr".src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion.component.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts
: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}
Biome
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.ts
[error] 39-39: This type annotation is trivially inferred from its initialization.
Safe fix: Remove the type annotation.
(lint/style/noInferrableTypes)
Additional comments not posted (53)
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.ts (2)
12-12
: LGTM: New input property adheres to guidelinesThe new
groupKey
input property is correctly implemented. It follows the camelCase naming convention, is properly decorated with@Input()
, and has an explicit type declaration. The optional nature (marked with?
) provides flexibility in usage.
Line range hint
1-23
: Verify usage in template and consider localizationThe changes align well with the PR objectives and follow the coding guidelines. To ensure complete implementation:
Verify that the
removeChannelPrefix
method is properly used in the corresponding HTML template (sidebar-card-item.component.html
).If any new user-visible strings were added as part of this change (e.g., in the HTML template), ensure they are properly localized using Angular's i18n features.
Run the following script to check the usage of
removeChannelPrefix
in the template:src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.html (2)
13-13
: LGTM. Please clarify the purpose of the newgroupKey
property.The addition of the
groupKey
input property to thejhi-sidebar-card-item
component is syntactically correct and follows Angular's property binding convention. While this change doesn't directly relate to the specific objectives mentioned in the PR summary, it could be part of the overall refactoring to support the new sidebar design.Could you please provide more context on the purpose of the
groupKey
property and how it contributes to the sidebar refactoring?
16-16
: Correct usage of @if directiveThe template correctly uses the new
@if
directive instead of the older*ngIf
. This aligns with the coding guideline to prefer@if
over*ngIf
.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-1
: Excellent use of new Angular syntax!The implementation of
@if
and@else
for conditional rendering is correct and aligns with the coding guidelines. This modern syntax improves readability and maintainability of the template.Also applies to: 10-10
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.html (1)
Line range hint
1-30
: Overall structure looks good and aligns with PR objectives.The removal of the other channels section and create channel button successfully streamlines the interface as intended. The remaining structure correctly uses @if and @for directives, adhering to the coding guidelines.
The simplified structure focuses on displaying the channels list, which improves the overall usability of the component.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-large/sidebar-card-large.component.ts (1)
16-16
: Approved syntax, but clarification needed ongroupKey
usageThe new
@Input() groupKey?: string;
property is correctly implemented following our coding guidelines. However, a few points need attention:
- The purpose of this new input is not clear from the code alone. Could you please clarify its intended use?
- There's no visible usage of this input within the component. Is the implementation complete?
- Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this input for better code maintainability.
To ensure this new input is properly utilized, please run the following script:
Consider adding a brief explanatory comment above the
groupKey
input:/** Key identifying the group this sidebar item belongs to */ @Input() groupKey?: string;Don't forget to add or update unit tests for this new input if necessary.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-small/sidebar-card-small.component.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-46
: Summary of review for SidebarCardSmallComponentOverall, the changes and existing code in this file adhere to Angular best practices and the provided coding guidelines. The new
groupKey
input property is a good addition that potentially supports the sidebar refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.Key points to address:
- Clarify the purpose and usage of the new
groupKey
property.- Consider the suggestions for improving navigation logic and error handling.
- Ensure that related files (template, spec, documentation) are updated to reflect this change.
Once these points are addressed, the changes in this file will be ready for approval.
19-19
: New input property added: Please clarify its purpose and usageThe new
groupKey
input property is syntactically correct and follows our naming conventions. Good job on making it optional for backward compatibility.However, a few points need attention:
- The purpose of this new property isn't immediately clear. Could you please clarify its intended use?
- Consider adding a brief comment above the property to explain its purpose and how it relates to the sidebar refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives.
- There's no visible usage of this property within the component's logic. Make sure it's properly utilized where needed.
To ensure this change is properly integrated, please run the following script:
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card.directive.ts (2)
16-16
: LGTM: New input property follows best practicesThe new
@Input() groupKey?: string;
property is well-defined. It follows Angular's input decorator syntax, uses the correct naming convention (camelCase), and is properly typed. Making it optional (?
) ensures backward compatibility.
16-16
: Consider adding tests for the new groupKey functionalityThe addition of the
groupKey
property aligns well with the PR objectives of refactoring the sidebar design. It potentially allows for more flexible grouping of sidebar items, which could improve the user experience. The changes are minimal and backward compatible.To ensure the robustness of this new feature:
- Add unit tests for the
SidebarCardDirective
that cover the newgroupKey
property.- Update any existing integration tests to include scenarios with the
groupKey
.Here's a script to check for existing tests:
This will help identify if there are already tests in place and where new tests might be needed.
Also applies to: 49-49
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.scss (5)
44-50
: LGTM: Consistent box-sizing for dropdown elementsThe addition of
box-sizing: border-box
to dropdown-related elements ensures consistent sizing behavior, which is a good practice for predictable layouts.
52-56
: LGTM: Appropriate styling for dropdown containerThe
.dropdown-container
class is correctly styled to be full-width and block-level, with relative positioning. This setup is suitable for the sidebar layout and allows for proper positioning of the dropdown menu.
63-65
: Verify readability with the current font sizeThe font size for buttons is set to 0.88em, which is slightly smaller than the default. While this may help in fitting more text in the sidebar buttons, it's important to ensure that the text remains easily readable, especially for the new "Create Chat" and "Add Channel" buttons mentioned in the PR objectives.
Please verify that the text on the new buttons is clearly legible with this font size across different screen sizes and resolutions.
81-96
: LGTM: Well-designed dropdown itemsThe styling for dropdown items is well-implemented. The clear visual separation, hover effect, and cursor change contribute to a good user experience. The explicit left text alignment ensures consistency across different browsers and contexts.
98-105
: Review font size consistency and width constraintsThe use of flexbox for alignment is good. However, there are two points to consider:
The font size (14px) set here may override the earlier button font size (0.88em). Ensure this is intentional and consistent with the design.
The min and max width constraints (100px and 200px) might limit the flexibility of the dropdown items. Verify that these constraints work well with all possible content lengths, especially for the new "Create Chat" and "Add Channel" dropdown items mentioned in the PR objectives.
Please review these points to ensure they align with the intended design and functionality of the new sidebar elements.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.html (5)
1-2
: LGTM! Improved rendering logic and syntax.The changes here are well-implemented:
- The use of
@for
instead of*ngFor
aligns with the new Angular syntax guidelines.- The new
@if
condition ensures that the accordion item container is only rendered when there are filtered items to display, which supports the PR objective of decluttering the interface.These changes enhance both the code quality and user experience.
23-24
: LGTM! Syntax update and minor styling adjustment.These changes are well-implemented:
- The use of
@for
instead of*ngFor
on line 23 aligns with the new Angular syntax guidelines.- The modification to the ngClass directive on line 24 maintains the existing functionality while slightly improving readability.
Both changes contribute to better code quality and maintainability.
38-40
: LGTM! Improved visual separation logic.This change enhances the sidebar's visual structure:
- The conditional rendering of the horizontal rule ensures it's only displayed when the accordion section is not collapsed.
- This aligns well with the PR objective of improving the sidebar's visual structure and usability.
The implementation effectively declutters the interface when sections are collapsed, providing a cleaner user experience.
42-43
: LGTM! Proper closure of conditional blocks.These closing tags are correct and necessary:
- They properly close the div and @if blocks opened earlier in the file.
- This structure ensures that the conditional rendering logic is complete and well-formed.
The placement of these closing tags contributes to the overall correctness of the template structure.
1-43
: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes with minor improvement suggested.This review has found that the changes to the sidebar accordion component are generally well-implemented and align with both the PR objectives and coding guidelines. Key points:
- The new Angular syntax (@for and @if) is correctly used throughout, improving code quality.
- The conditional rendering logic has been refined, supporting the goal of decluttering the interface.
- Visual improvements, such as the conditional horizontal rule, enhance the sidebar's usability.
One minor suggestion for improvement:
- Consider removing the redundant condition on line 20, as it's identical to the condition on line 2.
Overall, these changes successfully refactor the sidebar design, improving both the code quality and user experience.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion/sidebar-accordion.component.ts (1)
3-3
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been updated to include
ChannelTypeIcons
andSidebarTypes
, which aligns with the PR objectives for refactoring the sidebar design. This change follows the Angular style guide recommendations.src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.html (3)
32-35
: LGTM: New event bindings align with PR objectivesThe addition of these new event bindings (
onCreateChannelPressed
,onBrowsePressed
,onDirectChatPressed
, andonGroupChatPressed
) aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. They support the new functionality of creating direct chats, group chats, and browsing channels directly from the sidebar, which streamlines the user experience as intended.
39-39
: Please clarify the purpose of the newinCommunication
propertyA new property binding
[inCommunication]="true"
has been added to the sidebar component. Could you please provide more context on the purpose of this property and why it's set to a hard-coded value oftrue
? This will help ensure that the change is necessary and aligns with the overall objectives of the PR.
Line range hint
1-72
: Verify implementation of channel name prefix removalThe PR objectives mention removing prefixes like "exercise-", "lecture-", and "exam-" from channel names in the main view. However, these changes are not visible in the provided code. Could you please confirm if these changes have been implemented elsewhere or if they are still pending? This will help ensure all objectives of the PR are met.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.html (1)
54-54
: LGTM! Change aligns with PR objectives.The modification to use
removeChannelPrefix(sidebarItem, sidebarItem.title)
instead of directly displayingsidebarItem.title
aligns well with the PR objective of removing prefixes like "exercise-", "lecture-", and "exam-" from channel names in the main view.To ensure the
removeChannelPrefix
function is implemented correctly, let's check its implementation:Verification successful
Verified! Implementation of
removeChannelPrefix
is correct and aligns with PR objectives.
TheremoveChannelPrefix
function effectively removes the specified prefixes ('exercise-'
,'lecture-'
,'exam-'
) fromsidebarItem.title
, ensuring that channel names are displayed without these prefixes in the sidebar.
- Located in
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.ts
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of removeChannelPrefix function # Test: Search for the removeChannelPrefix function definition rg --type typescript -A 10 'removeChannelPrefix\s*\('Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry verifying the implementation of removeChannelPrefix function with correct file type # Test: Search for the removeChannelPrefix function definition using the correct TypeScript file type rg --type ts -A 10 'removeChannelPrefix\s*\('Length of output: 1431
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-135
: Overall, excellent refactoring that aligns with PR objectives.The changes in this file significantly contribute to enhancing the sidebar design and simplifying the channel creation process. The removal of unused code, simplification of the
loadChannelsOfCourse
method, and updates to the component's structure all support the PR objectives.Key improvements:
- Streamlined imports and removed unused dependencies.
- Eliminated the
otherChannels
array and associated logic, simplifying channel management.- Removed the modal-based channel creation process, paving the way for the new button-based approach.
These changes should result in a more maintainable codebase and an improved user experience. Great work!
src/test/javascript/spec/component/shared/sidebar/sidebar-accordion.component.spec.ts (8)
Line range hint
1-31
: LGTM: Import statements and component setup are correct.The changes in the import statements, specifically the removal of
AccordionAddOptionsComponent
, align with the AI summary. The use ofMockModule
andMockPipe
from 'ng-mocks' is consistent with best practices for unit testing. The TestBed configuration includes all necessary components and modules.
Line range hint
64-70
: LGTM: Test case correctly verifies toggle functionality.This test case effectively checks the
toggleGroupCategoryCollapse
method of the component. The use oftoBeFalse()
andtoBeTrue()
for assertions is consistent with the coding guidelines for boolean expectations.
Line range hint
72-79
: LGTM: Test case effectively verifies collapse state change on header click.This test case correctly simulates a click event on the group header and verifies that the collapse state is updated accordingly. The use of
debugElement.query()
andtriggerEventHandler()
is appropriate for simulating user interactions in tests.
Line range hint
81-89
: LGTM: Test case correctly verifies expandAll call on searchValue change.This test case effectively checks that
expandAll()
is called whensearchValue
changes to a non-empty string. The use ofjest.spyOn()
andtoHaveBeenCalledOnce()
is consistent with the coding guidelines for mocking and verifying method calls.
Line range hint
91-101
: LGTM: Test case correctly verifies expandAll call when filter is active.This test case effectively checks that
expandAll()
is called whenisFilterActive
is set to true. The use ofjest.spyOn()
andtoHaveBeenCalledOnce()
is consistent with the coding guidelines for mocking and verifying method calls.
Line range hint
103-120
: LGTM: Test case correctly verifies setStoredCollapseState call when searchValue is cleared.This test case effectively checks that
setStoredCollapseState()
is called whensearchValue
is cleared. The use ofjest.spyOn()
,toHaveBeenCalledOnce()
, andtoEqual()
is consistent with the coding guidelines for mocking, verifying method calls, and checking object equality.
Line range hint
122-141
: LGTM: Test case correctly verifies element visibility based on searchValue.This test case effectively checks that the 'd-none' class is correctly added to or removed from elements based on the
searchValue
. The use ofquerySelector()
to find elements andclassList.contains()
to check for the presence of the class is appropriate. The expectations usingtoBeTruthy()
,toBeFalse()
, andtoBeTrue()
are consistent with the coding guidelines for boolean assertions.
Line range hint
143-146
: LGTM: Test case correctly verifies expansion of the group containing the selected item.This test case effectively checks that the
expandGroupWithSelectedItem()
method expands the correct group. The use oftoBeFalse()
to verify that the collapse state is set to false (i.e., expanded) is consistent with the coding guidelines for boolean assertions.src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar.component.ts (7)
27-30
: LGTM: New event emitters align with PR objectivesThe addition of these four event emitters (
onDirectChatPressed
,onGroupChatPressed
,onBrowsePressed
, andonCreateChannelPressed
) aligns well with the PR objectives to streamline the process of creating chats and channels. The naming is clear, follows the camelCase convention, and the use ofEventEmitter<void>
is appropriate for these action triggers.
71-72
: LGTM: New dropdown visibility properties addedThe addition of
showChatDropdown
andshowChannelDropdown
properties is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives to introduce dropdown menus for chat and channel creation. The naming is clear, follows the camelCase convention, and the initialization tofalse
is suitable for dropdowns that should be closed by default.
74-86
: LGTM: Dropdown toggle methods implement required functionalityThe
toggleChatDropdown
andtoggleChannelDropdown
methods effectively implement the new dropdown functionality mentioned in the PR objectives. These methods ensure that only one dropdown can be open at a time, which is a good UX practice. The implementation follows the coding guidelines with proper naming conventions, arrow functions, curly braces, and indentation.
88-91
: LGTM: Channel creation method addedThe
createNewChannel
method effectively implements the functionality to create a new channel as mentioned in the PR objectives. It correctly emits theonCreateChannelPressed
event and closes the channel dropdown, which is a good UX practice. The implementation is concise and follows the coding guidelines.
93-96
: LGTM: Channel browsing method addedThe
browseChannels
method effectively implements the functionality to browse channels as mentioned in the PR objectives. It correctly emits theonBrowsePressed
event and closes the channel dropdown, which is a good UX practice. The implementation is concise and follows the coding guidelines.
98-106
: LGTM: Direct and group chat creation methods addedThe
createDirectChat
andcreateGroupChat
methods effectively implement the functionality to create direct and group chats as mentioned in the PR objectives. They correctly emit their respective events (onDirectChatPressed
andonGroupChatPressed
) and close the chat dropdown, which is a good UX practice. The implementation is concise and follows the coding guidelines.
Line range hint
1-106
: Overall: Excellent implementation of sidebar enhancementsThe changes made to the
SidebarComponent
successfully address the PR objectives to enhance the sidebar's functionality. The new event emitters, properties, and methods effectively implement the streamlined process for creating chats and channels. The code quality is high, with clear naming conventions and appropriate use of Angular features.Key improvements include:
- Addition of separate buttons for chat and channel creation with dropdown menus.
- Implementation of methods to handle direct chat, group chat, and channel creation.
- Addition of a channel browsing feature.
These changes align well with the goal of improving user experience by simplifying the process of creating and managing conversations and channels.
One minor suggestion was made to remove a trivial type annotation, but overall, the implementation is solid and adheres to the provided coding guidelines.
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/conversation.json (1)
194-194
: Simplified channel overview title aligns with PR objectives.The modification of the
title
property from an object to a single string successfully addresses the PR objective of removing prefixes like "exercise-", "lecture-", and "exam-" from the main view. This change promotes a more unified and simplified interface.The use of the template literal
"All Channels in course {{ courseTitle }}"
maintains context-awareness by dynamically inserting the course title.To ensure consistency across the application, please verify that:
- The corresponding React/Angular components correctly handle this new string format.
- Similar changes have been made in other language files.
You can use the following script to check for consistency in other language files:
Verification successful
All language files have been updated consistently.
The
title
field in all language files, including English and German, has been updated to"All Channels in course {{ courseTitle }}"
and its equivalent translations. This ensures consistency across the application’s internationalization setup.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in other language files # Test: Look for similar changes in other language files rg --type json 'title":\s*"All Channels in course \{\{ courseTitle \}\}"' src/main/webapp/i18nLength of output: 207
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the 'title' fields from all non-English language files for comparison # Find all conversation.json files excluding the English version languages=$(fd 'conversation.json' src/main/webapp/i18n -type f | grep -v '/en/') # Loop through each file and extract the 'title' field for file in $languages; do echo "File: $file" rg '"title":\s*".*"' "$file" echo "" doneLength of output: 252
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the 'title' fields from all non-English language files for comparison # Find all conversation.json files excluding the English version languages=$(fd 'conversation.json' src/main/webapp/i18n --type file | grep -v '/en/') # Loop through each file and extract the 'title' field for file in $languages; do echo "File: $file" rg '"title":\s*".*"' "$file" echo "" doneLength of output: 1137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the 'title' fields from all language conversation.json files for comparison # Find all conversation.json files languages=$(fd 'conversation.json' src/main/webapp/i18n --type file) # Loop through each file and extract the 'title' field for file in $languages; do echo "File: $file" rg '"title":\s*".*"' "$file" echo "" doneLength of output: 2089
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/student-dashboard.json (3)
66-66
: LGTM: "addChannel" entry added correctly.The new "addChannel" entry is concise, follows naming conventions, and aligns with the PR objectives.
69-69
: LGTM: "createChat" entry added correctly.The new "createChat" entry is concise, follows naming conventions, and aligns with the PR objectives.
66-71
: LGTM: New entries successfully support sidebar enhancements.The added internationalization entries effectively support the new sidebar functionality for creating channels and chats. These changes align well with the PR objectives of streamlining the user interface and improving the user experience. The entries are consistent with the existing file structure and naming conventions.
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/student-dashboard.json (5)
66-66
: LGTM: Correct translation for "addChannel"The translation "Kanal hinzufügen" for "addChannel" is correct and follows the required informal style (dutzen).
69-69
: LGTM: Correct translation for "createChat"The translation "Chat erstellen" for "createChat" is correct and follows the required informal style (dutzen).
70-70
: LGTM: Correct translation for "createGroupChat"The translation "Gruppen-Chat erstellen" for "createGroupChat" is correct, uses proper hyphenation, and follows the required informal style (dutzen).
71-71
: LGTM: Correct translation for "createDirectChat"The translation "Direkt-Chat erstellen" for "createDirectChat" is correct, uses proper hyphenation, and follows the required informal style (dutzen).
66-71
: Summary: New translations align with PR objectivesThe new translations for "addChannel", "createChat", "createGroupChat", and "createDirectChat" have been added correctly. These additions align well with the PR objectives, specifically:
- They support the new UI elements for creating chats and adding channels.
- The translations accurately reflect the intended functionality described in the PR summary.
- All new translations adhere to the required informal style (dutzen) and are consistent with the existing translations in the file.
These changes contribute to enhancing the user interface of the sidebar in the Artemis application as intended.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.spec.ts (2)
54-54
: Proper declaration of 'modalService'Declaring
modalService
at the class level allows it to be accessible in all test cases, promoting code reuse.
133-133
: Correct injection of 'NgbModal' in test setupInjecting
NgbModal
usingTestBed.inject
preparesmodalService
for use in the tests, ensuring that the modal operations can be properly spied upon.
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-large/sidebar-card-large.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-item/sidebar-card-item.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ourse-conversations/dialogs/channels-overview-dialog/channels-overview-dialog.component.html
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/shared/sidebar/sidebar-card-medium/sidebar-card-medium.component.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...vascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...vascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...vascript/spec/component/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-conversations/course-conversations.component.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…card-large.component.html Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ccordion.component.html Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…idebar' into feature/communication/refactor-sidebar
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on TS3. Everything works and looks great. 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the quick fix, lgtm!
Communication
: Refactor sidebar designCommunication
: Improve sidebar user interface design
Checklist
General
Client
Motivation and Context
1st issue: Next to each channel section header in sidebar, there was a "+" icon for channel creation. Even in sections where users couldn’t create a channel (e.g., the "exam" section), the "+" button was still visible. This was unnecessary and added clutter. And when this was clicked, the user first had to view the browse channel screen and then click the button in that dialog again to create a channel. Having too many icons and the need to open two dialogs one after the other was not user-friendly.
2nd issue: As discussed in the communication subgroup, the section header should not be visible when there are no channels/conversations in that section.
3rd issue: Although the prefixes "exercise-", "lecture-", and "exam-" were included in the names of the exercise, lecture, and exam channels respectively, their presence was unnecessary since the channels were already grouped into their corresponding sections. This made the interface look complicated.
Description
1st issue:
2nd issue: If a section is empty (i.e., there are no channels or conversations), the section header is no longer visible.
3rd issue: The channel prefixes ("exercise-" "lecture-" and "exam-") do not appear in their respective sections; they are only visible in the favorite and hidden sections.
Steps for Testing
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Code Review
Manual Tests
Test Coverage
Screenshots
Updated Sidebar Design
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation