Custom perturbation with dataframes #202
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Now we have to decide if we have to erase the function of |
|
Thes test that are falling are replace by the new custom perturbation (with dataframes in the other branch) |
1 similar comment
|
Thes test that are falling are replace by the new custom perturbation (with dataframes in the other branch) |
added 3 commits
May 20, 2022 11:46
|
When energy distribution custom perturbation is add, all the test will be passed |
added 11 commits
May 23, 2022 16:21
AitorBengoechea
force-pushed
the
xs_perturbation
branch
from
83c95e3 to
7b767ae
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@luca-fiorito-11:
Now custom perturbation is coherent with njoy results and can perturb all the xs.