Any fork with this fix?

[sisi399]

Hello,

I am using the Dependencies tool and have a feature request that I hope someone can help me with. Currently, when I click on a module with missing imports, the default view in the imports section does not prioritize the missing imports. I have to click the sortable column header twice to sort the missing imports to the top. Here are some screenshots illustrating the current behavior and the desired outcome:

1. Default view: Kernel32.dll has missing imports, but these are scattered throughout the "PI" column.

2. Double-clicking the "PI" column header (indicated by the red arrow) sorts the column so that the missing imports appear at the top. See Picture 2.

Picture 2

I would love for Dependencies to automatically show the missing imports at the top by default when I click on a module.
Unfortunately, I do not have experience with C# or XAML, so I am unsure how to make this change myself.

It would be wonderful if someone with a coding experience could modify the source code so I can compile it myself. Alternatively, is there a fork that already has this modification implemented?

Thank you in advance for your help.

[sisi399]

I've managed to compile successfully, but despite hours of effort i haven't had any success as I have no idea what I'm doing, lmao.

Here are some of my attempts:

• I tried commenting out this.ImportList.ResetAutoSortProperty(); in DependenciesGui\DependencyWindow.xaml.cs to prevent the column sort from resetting when switching between different modules after manually sorting by the "PI" column.

• I attempted to manually add util:GridViewSort.AutoSort=True properties in some .xaml files.

• I also experimented with replacing Wpf.Util.GridViewSort.RemoveSort(this.Items, this); at Line 89 in DependenciesGui\DependencyImportList.xaml.cs with Wpf.Util.GridViewSort.ApplySort. However, I encountered compilation issues, likely due to incorrect specification of the four arguments required.

[sisi399]

I found a question on Stack Overflow from 8 years ago that addresses the exact same issue using the same library. There’s even an answer provided. I still wasn't able to do it myself.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31458719/implementing-initial-sort-on-listview-using-a-class

Tagging some individuals who have contributed to Dependencies or maintain their own forks:
@viruscamp @lhak @sonyps5201314 @wekoil @DawmosTomie @himeshsameera @neeraj9 @sj6219

I apologize for the unsolicited tag. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated.

[Neustradamus]

I have done a new ticket for @lucasg to migrate this repository into an organization to continuous the development:

• Transfer this repository into another place (organization) to continuous the development #280

[himeshsameera]

@sisi399 I too understand it will be good to have the missing dependencies at the top. And I do not see any other natural order that is more convenient. Therefore I have added a fix for this by taking all the missing import data to the top. A new release is created on my fork. Please check whether this solves your problem. And please update if you have any comments or new feature requests.

[Neustradamus]

@himeshsameera: Thanks for your fork and releases but can you rename filenames to be perfect?

• https://github.com/himeshsameera/Dependencies/releases
• Dependencies_V_2.2.0_x64.zip to Dependencies_v2.2.0_x64.zip
• Dependencies_V2.2.0_x86.zip to Dependencies_v2.2.0_x86.zip

[himeshsameera]

@himeshsameera: Thanks for your fork and releases but can you rename filenames to be perfect?

* https://github.com/himeshsameera/Dependencies/releases

* Dependencies_V_2.2.0_x64.zip to Dependencies_v2.2.0_x64.zip

* Dependencies_V2.2.0_x86.zip to Dependencies_v2.2.0_x86.zip

Thank You for the feedback. Done.

[Neustradamus]

@himeshsameera: Thanks!
Can you do same for the old one too?

• V2.0-alpha to v2.0-alpha

Please check title of all too.

[Neustradamus]

@himeshsameera: I think that you have forgotten my previous message, can you look?