Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated schedule logic for placement groups for ray backend #2523

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 20, 2022

Conversation

magdyksaleh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 18, 2022

Unit Test Results

         6 files  ±0         6 suites  ±0   2h 46m 22s ⏱️ - 10m 57s
  3 395 tests +1  3 317 ✔️ +1    78 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
10 185 runs  +3  9 928 ✔️ +3  257 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit e86d46e. ± Comparison against base commit f06e9f4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

ludwig/backend/ray.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ludwig/backend/ray.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@tgaddair
Copy link
Collaborator

@magdyksaleh I'm assuming you want this to be included in 0.6? In that case, you should add the release-0.6 label to this PR.

@tgaddair
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, you should add a test to make sure this works as expected.

@magdyksaleh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, you should add a test to make sure this works as expected.

Added

@magdyksaleh magdyksaleh merged commit 3e655dc into master Sep 20, 2022
@magdyksaleh magdyksaleh deleted the updated-schedule-logic-for-pg branch September 20, 2022 21:03
@@ -812,17 +812,24 @@ def initialize(self):
# Disable placement groups on dask
dask.config.set(annotations={"ray_remote_args": {"placement_group": None}})

def generate_bundles(self, num_cpu):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: prefix with underscore since this is not really meant to be used outside this package.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants