Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated the Deprected method to recommended method. #1397

Merged

Conversation

dev13-suthar
Copy link
Contributor

@dev13-suthar dev13-suthar commented Oct 15, 2024

Description

not a major fixed just updated the specific component schema. earlier it was using z.nonEmpty() but it is deprecated so i have updated it to recommended approach: z.min(1)

Checklist

Please check off all the following items with an "x" in the boxes before requesting a review.

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated validation for participant names in the New Participant Form, allowing names with at least one character.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved flexibility in participant name input handling.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024

@dev13-suthar is attempting to deploy a commit to the rallly Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the validation schema for participant names in the NewParticipantForm component of the application. The validation for the name field in both the requiredEmailSchema and optionalEmailSchema has been adjusted from nonempty() to min(1), allowing names to be valid with just one character. This change enhances the flexibility of input for participant names while maintaining the existing structure and logic of form submission and email handling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/src/components/new-participant-modal.tsx Updated validation for name field in requiredEmailSchema and optionalEmailSchema from nonempty() to min(1).

Poem

In the meadow where we play,
Names can now be short and gay.
Just a letter, one will do,
Join our fun, there's room for you!
Hop along, let's celebrate,
Flexible names, oh, isn't that great? 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/src/components/new-participant-modal.tsx (2)

22-22: Approved change with a minor suggestion.

The update from nonempty() to min(1) aligns with the PR objectives and current Zod best practices. The addition of max(100) is a good practice to limit the maximum length of the name.

Consider adding a custom error message for better user feedback:

-  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
+  name: z.string().min(1, { message: "Name is required" }).max(100, { message: "Name must be 100 characters or less" }),

28-28: Approved change with a minor suggestion.

The update is consistent with the changes made in the requiredEmailSchema, maintaining code consistency and adhering to current Zod best practices.

Consider adding a custom error message for better user feedback, similar to the suggestion for requiredEmailSchema:

-  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
+  name: z.string().min(1, { message: "Name is required" }).max(100, { message: "Name must be 100 characters or less" }),
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9af5b69 and 6c448e2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/new-participant-modal.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/src/components/new-participant-modal.tsx (1)

22-22: Verify impact on application requirements and user experience.

The schema changes allow for names with a single character and limit names to 100 characters. While this provides more flexibility, it's important to ensure this aligns with the application's requirements and user expectations.

Please confirm:

  1. Is allowing single-character names intentional and aligned with the application's requirements?
  2. Is the 100-character limit for names sufficient for your use case?
  3. Have you considered the impact on existing data and any necessary migrations?

To help verify the current usage of participant names in the database, you can run the following script:

This script will help you understand the current distribution of name lengths in your database, which can inform your decision on the appropriateness of the new validation rules.

Also applies to: 28-28

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 15, 2024 7:28am
landing ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 15, 2024 7:28am

@lukevella
Copy link
Owner

Nice one @dev13-suthar. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants