📈 Posthog package #1425
📈 Posthog package #1425
Conversation
Move posthog client hook Posthog provider Server side session
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to a Next.js application, primarily focused on enhancing PostHog analytics integration and user management. Key changes include the addition of new dependencies, updates to user context handling, and modifications to various components for improved analytics tracking. Notably, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (32)
apps/web/src/auth/session-provider.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and well-structured imports.The "use client" directive is correctly placed, and the imports are properly organized with clear type separation.
Consider grouping imports by adding a newline between type imports and component imports for better readability:
"use client"; import type { SessionProviderProps } from "next-auth/react"; + import { SessionProvider as NextAuthSessionProvider } from "next-auth/react";apps/web/src/pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.The change to import from
@rallly/posthog/serverinstead of a local path is a good architectural decision that:
- Improves modularity by centralizing PostHog integration
- Maintains clear client/server separation with the
/serversuffix- Makes the package more maintainable and reusable
packages/eslint-config/react.js (1)
5-6: Consider adding parameter validation.The
workspaceDirPathparameter should be validated to ensure it's a valid directory path before being used.module.exports = function (workspaceDirPath) { + if (typeof workspaceDirPath !== "string") { + throw new TypeError("workspaceDirPath must be a string"); + } const baseConfig = preset(workspaceDirPath);apps/web/src/app/components/logout-button.tsx (1)
Line range hint
14-20: Add error handling for the logout request.The fetch call to
/api/logoutshould include error handling to gracefully handle network failures or server errors.Consider implementing error handling:
onClick={async (e) => { onClick?.(e); - await fetch("/api/logout", { method: "POST" }); - posthog?.capture("logout"); - posthog?.reset(); - window.location.href = "/login"; + try { + const response = await fetch("/api/logout", { method: "POST" }); + if (!response.ok) { + throw new Error(`Logout failed: ${response.statusText}`); + } + posthog?.capture("logout"); + posthog?.reset(); + window.location.href = "/login"; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Logout failed:", error); + // Consider showing a user-friendly error message + } }}packages/posthog/src/server/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
7-12: Consider optimizing PostHog event batching configuration.The current configuration (
flushAt: 1, flushInterval: 0) triggers immediate event flushing, which might impact performance under high load. Consider implementing batching for better efficiency.const posthogClient = new PostHog(apiKey, { host: apiHost, - flushAt: 1, - flushInterval: 0, + flushAt: 20, // Batch up to 20 events + flushInterval: 10, // Flush every 10 seconds });
Line range hint
17-21: Enhance error logging and add retry mechanism.While the shutdown mechanism is properly implemented with
waitUntil, the error handling could be improved with more detailed logging and a retry mechanism for failed flushes.export function posthogApiHandler() { + const maxRetries = 3; + const retryDelay = 1000; // 1 second + + const flushWithRetry = async (attempt = 1) => { + try { + await posthog?.shutdown(); + } catch (error) { + if (attempt < maxRetries) { + console.warn(`PostHog flush attempt ${attempt} failed, retrying...`, error); + await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, retryDelay)); + return flushWithRetry(attempt + 1); + } + throw error; + } + }; + try { - waitUntil(Promise.all([posthog?.shutdown()])); + waitUntil(flushWithRetry()); } catch (error) { - console.error("Failed to flush PostHog events:", error); + console.error("Failed to flush PostHog events after multiple retries:", { + error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error), + stack: error instanceof Error ? error.stack : undefined, + }); } }packages/posthog/src/client/provider.tsx (1)
33-34: Add type safety to Provider children.The rendering logic is correct, but we can improve type safety.
- return <Provider client={posthog}>{props.children}</Provider>; + return ( + <Provider client={posthog}> + {props.children as React.ReactElement} + </Provider> + );apps/web/src/components/upgrade-button.tsx (2)
Line range hint
28-30: Enhance PostHog event properties for better analytics.Consider including the plan type (annual/monthly) in the event properties to track user preferences and improve conversion analytics.
- posthog?.capture("click upgrade button"); + posthog?.capture("click upgrade button", { + planType: annual ? "yearly" : "monthly" + });
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
Security concerns identified with return_path handling
The
return_pathfromwindow.location.pathnameis passed directly to the Stripe checkout endpoint and used inabsoluteUrl()without proper validation. WhileabsoluteUrl()creates a new URL object, it doesn't validate the path for:
- Directory traversal attacks (
../)- Malicious path segments
- Path normalization
Recommendations:
- Add server-side validation for the
return_pathparameter before using it insuccess_urlandcancel_url- Implement a whitelist of allowed return paths
- Consider URL encoding/decoding the path to prevent injection attacks
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
13-24: Verify return_path sanitization for security.The use of
window.location.pathnamedirectly in the form submission could potentially be exploited. Ensure that:
- The return_path is properly sanitized on the server side
- The Stripe checkout endpoint validates the period value
Let me search for the API route implementation to verify the validation.
Let me try a different search strategy to locate the API route implementation.
Let me check for the
absoluteUrlutility function since it's being used with the return_path.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Look for return_path validation in the API route rg -A 5 "api/stripe/checkout"Length of output: 650
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for stripe checkout route implementation fd -t f "checkout.ts" -t f "checkout.js" --exec rg -A 10 "export.*handler|router.*post.*checkout" # Search for any validation middleware or utils rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "validateReturnPath|sanitize.*path|validate.*path" -A 5Length of output: 285
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for stripe-related files in the api directory fd -t f "stripe" -t f "checkout" --base-directory apps/web/src/app/api # Search for route handlers with broader pattern rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "stripe.*checkout|createCheckout|checkout.*session" -A 10 # Look for any path validation utilities fd -t f -e ts -e js --exec rg -l "path.*validation|sanitize.*path|validate.*url"Length of output: 4148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for absoluteUrl implementation rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" "function absoluteUrl|const absoluteUrl" -B 5 -A 10 # Look for any URL or path validation in the stripe checkout handler rg -g "!*.test.*" -g "!*.spec.*" -A 10 "export.*handler.*checkout|export.*createCheckout" apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/Length of output: 1126
apps/web/src/pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts (2)
Line range hint
39-44: Consider enhancing error monitoring coverage.While capturing internal server errors is good, consider monitoring other critical error types (e.g., UNAUTHORIZED, FORBIDDEN) to better track API usage patterns and potential security issues.
onError({ error }) { if (error.code === "INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR") { Sentry.captureException(error); } + // Log other critical errors + if (["UNAUTHORIZED", "FORBIDDEN"].includes(error.code)) { + Sentry.captureException(error, { + level: "warning", + tags: { errorType: error.code }, + }); + } },
Line range hint
20-38: Consider adding explicit type definitions for the context.The context object structure would benefit from explicit typing for better maintainability and type safety.
Add these type definitions at the top of the file:
type UserContext = { id: string; isGuest: boolean; locale?: string; image?: string; getEmailClient: () => ReturnType<typeof getEmailClient>; }; type ApiContext = { user: UserContext; req: NextApiRequest; res: NextApiResponse; };Then use them in the context creation:
-const res = { +const context: ApiContext = { user: { id: session.user.id, isGuest: session.user.email === null,apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/delete-poll-dialog.tsx (1)
Line range hint
24-29: Consider enriching analytics event with additional context.While the basic event tracking is in place, adding poll metadata (excluding PII) could provide more valuable analytics insights.
Consider enriching the event data:
- posthog?.capture("deleted poll"); + posthog?.capture("deleted poll", { + source: "manage_poll_dialog", + // Add non-PII metadata that could be valuable for analytics + });apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/duplicate-dialog.tsx (1)
Event naming conventions are inconsistent across the codebase
The codebase currently uses mixed event naming conventions:
- Snake case:
trigger_paywall- Space-separated:
duplicate poll,timezone change detected- Camel case:
createdPoll- Single words:
register,logoutFor better analytics consistency, consider:
- Using snake_case for all event names (e.g.,
duplicate_pollinstead ofduplicate poll)- Standardizing verb tense (e.g.,
created_pollvscreate_poll)- Documenting the convention in the codebase
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
40-45: Consider standardizing the event name formatWhile the event tracking implementation is good, consider using a standardized format for event names (e.g., snake_case or camelCase) to maintain consistency across analytics.
Let's verify the event naming convention across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check PostHog event naming patterns across the codebase # Expected: This will help identify the predominant event naming convention # Search for PostHog event capture calls rg -A 1 "posthog.*capture\("Length of output: 5801
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/delete-account-dialog.tsx (2)
Line range hint
43-51: Consider enriching the delete account event with additional contextWhile the event capture is correctly placed, consider adding relevant properties to provide more insights into account deletions:
onSuccess() { - posthog?.capture("delete account"); + posthog?.capture("delete account", { + accountAge: /* time since account creation */, + lastActive: /* last activity timestamp */, + totalPolls: /* number of polls created */ + }); trpcUtils.invalidate(); signOut({ callbackUrl: "/login",This additional context could help understand patterns in account deletions and improve user retention.
Add error handling to account deletion mutation
The codebase has a toast notification system (
useToasthook) available but the account deletion mutation doesn't utilize it for error handling. Add anonErrorhandler to inform users when the deletion fails:const toast = useToast(); const deleteAccount = trpc.user.delete.useMutation({ onSuccess() { posthog?.capture("delete account"); trpcUtils.invalidate(); signOut({ callbackUrl: "/login", }); }, onError(error) { toast({ variant: "destructive", title: "Error", description: "Failed to delete account. Please try again later.", }); } });🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
43-51: Verify error handling for account deletionThe deletion mutation lacks explicit error handling. Consider how failed deletions are communicated to users.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's error handling for the delete mutation across the codebase rg -A 5 "user.delete.useMutation" # Look for any existing error toast/notification patterns rg -A 5 "onError.*toast|useToast.*error"Length of output: 730
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for toast/notification patterns in the delete account dialog rg -A 10 "const.*DeleteAccountDialog" # Check for any toast/notification utilities or components fd "toast" --type f # Look for error handling patterns in mutations across the codebase ast-grep --pattern 'useMutation({ $$$ onError: $_, $$$ })'Length of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the toast implementation and usage patterns cat packages/ui/src/hooks/use-toast.ts # Check how other mutations handle errors in the codebase rg -A 5 "useMutation.*onError" # Look for any existing error handling patterns in the settings section rg -B 5 -A 5 "onError" "apps/web/src/app/\[locale\]/\(admin\)/settings/"Length of output: 4212
apps/web/src/components/poll/notifications-toggle.tsx (2)
Line range hint
42-56: Consider adding error tracking for failed mutations.While the success handlers are well implemented, adding error tracking would help monitor failed notification toggles.
const watch = trpc.polls.watch.useMutation({ onSuccess: () => { posthog?.capture("turned notifications on", { pollId: poll.id, source: "notifications-toggle", }); // ... rest of the success handler }, + onError: (error) => { + posthog?.capture("failed to turn notifications on", { + pollId: poll.id, + source: "notifications-toggle", + error: error.message, + }); + }, }); const unwatch = trpc.polls.unwatch.useMutation({ onSuccess: () => { posthog?.capture("turned notifications off", { pollId: poll.id, source: "notifications-toggle", }); // ... rest of the success handler }, + onError: (error) => { + posthog?.capture("failed to turn notifications off", { + pollId: poll.id, + source: "notifications-toggle", + error: error.message, + }); + }, });Also applies to: 58-72
Line range hint
42-46: Consider consolidating analytics event names into constants.To maintain consistency and prevent typos in event names across the application, consider extracting these as constants.
// Add to a shared analytics constants file export const ANALYTICS_EVENTS = { NOTIFICATIONS: { ENABLED: "turned notifications on", DISABLED: "turned notifications off", ENABLE_FAILED: "failed to turn notifications on", DISABLE_FAILED: "failed to turn notifications off", }, } as const;Then use them in the component:
-posthog?.capture("turned notifications on", { +posthog?.capture(ANALYTICS_EVENTS.NOTIFICATIONS.ENABLED, { pollId: poll.id, source: "notifications-toggle", });Also applies to: 60-64
apps/web/src/components/create-poll.tsx (1)
Line range hint
127-137: Consider enhancing analytics tracking.The current implementation captures good metrics on successful poll creation. Consider these improvements:
- Use a consistent event naming format (e.g.,
poll.createdinstead ofcreated poll)- Add tracking for form validation failures to identify UX pain points
Here's how you could enhance the analytics:
onSuccess: (res) => { - posthog?.capture("created poll", { + posthog?.capture("poll.created", { pollId: res.id, numberOfOptions: formData.options?.length, optionsView: formData?.view, tier: user.tier, $set: { last_poll_created_at: new Date().toISOString(), }, }); queryClient.invalidate(); router.push(`/poll/${res.id}`); }, +}, +onError: (error) => { + posthog?.capture("poll.creation_failed", { + error: error.message, + numberOfOptions: formData.options?.length, + optionsView: formData?.view, + tier: user.tier, + }); },apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-picture.tsx (2)
Line range hint
17-108: Consider extracting constants and enhancing error handlingThe implementation is robust, but could be improved by:
- Extracting magic numbers into named constants
- Adding specific error handling for network-related issues during upload
Consider applying these improvements:
+ const MAX_FILE_SIZE = 2 * 1024 * 1024; // 2MB + const MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB = 2; - if (file.size > 2 * 1024 * 1024) { + if (file.size > MAX_FILE_SIZE) { toast({ title: t("fileTooLarge"), description: t("fileTooLargeDescription", { - defaultValue: "Please upload a file smaller than 2MB.", + defaultValue: `Please upload a file smaller than ${MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB}MB.`, }), }); } try { // ... existing upload code ... } catch (error) { + if (error instanceof TypeError || error.name === 'NetworkError') { + toast({ + title: t("networkError", { + defaultValue: "Network Error", + }), + description: t("networkErrorDescription", { + defaultValue: "Please check your internet connection and try again.", + }), + }); + } else { toast({ title: t("errorUploadPicture"), description: t("errorUploadPictureDescription"), }); + } Sentry.captureException(error); }
Line range hint
134-162: Consider enhancing analytics event propertiesWhile the basic event tracking is in place, consider adding more context to the analytics events to make them more valuable for analysis.
Consider enriching the events with additional properties:
- posthog?.capture("upload profile picture"); + posthog?.capture("profile_picture.upload", { + success: true, + fileType: "image", + source: "settings_page" + }); - posthog?.capture("remove profile picture"); + posthog?.capture("profile_picture.remove", { + source: "settings_page" + });apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/sidebar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
134-136: Consider enhancing analytics type-safetyThe PostHog event tracking implementation is correct, but could benefit from type-safety to ensure consistency across the application.
Consider creating a typed events constant or enum to standardize event names across the application. Example:
// src/constants/analytics.ts export const ANALYTICS_EVENTS = { TRIGGER_PAYWALL: 'trigger paywall', // ... other events } as const; export type AnalyticsEvent = typeof ANALYTICS_EVENTS[keyof typeof ANALYTICS_EVENTS];Then use it like:
onClick={() => posthog?.capture(ANALYTICS_EVENTS.TRIGGER_PAYWALL, { from: "sidebar" })}apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(auth)/login/login-form.tsx (2)
Line range hint
47-94: Consider tracking analytics for all login methods.While guest login tracking has been added, consider tracking attempts for other authentication methods (email, OIDC, Google, Azure AD) for consistent analytics coverage. This would provide valuable insights into authentication method preferences and potential issues.
Here's how you could add analytics for all methods:
if (providers?.oidc) { res.push({ login: () => { + posthog?.capture("click login with oidc"); signIn("oidc", { callbackUrl, }); }, icon: <UserIcon className="text-muted-foreground size-5" />, name: t("loginWith", { provider: providers.oidc.name }), }); } if (providers?.google) { res.push({ login: () => { + posthog?.capture("click login with google"); signIn("google", { callbackUrl, }); }, icon: ( <Image src="/static/google.svg" width={20} height={20} alt="Google" /> ), name: t("loginWith", { provider: providers.google.name }), }); } if (providers?.["azure-ad"]) { res.push({ login: () => { + posthog?.capture("click login with azure-ad"); signIn("azure-ad", { callbackUrl, }); }, icon: ( <Image src="/static/microsoft.svg" width={20} height={20} alt="Azure AD" /> ), name: t("loginWith", { provider: "Microsoft" }), }); }
Line range hint
134-146: Consider tracking email login attempts.For completeness in analytics tracking, consider adding PostHog event capture for email login attempts.
Add analytics tracking before the email verification:
onSubmit={handleSubmit(async ({ email }) => { + posthog?.capture("click login with email"); const res = await sendVerificationEmail(email); if (res?.error) { setError("email", { message: t("userNotFound"), }); } else { setEmail(email); } })}apps/web/src/components/forms/poll-settings.tsx (1)
Line range hint
146-156: Consider improving analytics tracking robustness.A few suggestions to make the analytics implementation more maintainable:
- Consider using constants for event names to prevent typos
- Type the setting names in analytics events
- Consider removing optional chaining on posthog calls
Here's how you could improve it:
// At the top of the file or in a separate constants file const ANALYTICS_EVENTS = { TRIGGER_PAYWALL: 'trigger paywall' } as const; type PollSetting = 'require-participant-email' | 'hide-participants' | 'hide-scores'; // In the component if (isFree) { paywallDialog.trigger(); if (!posthog) return; posthog.capture(ANALYTICS_EVENTS.TRIGGER_PAYWALL, { setting: setting as PollSetting, from: "poll-settings", }); }Also applies to: 182-192, 218-228
apps/web/src/components/participant-dropdown.tsx (1)
Event naming convention appears inconsistent across the codebase
Looking at the PostHog event captures across the codebase, there's indeed inconsistency in event naming:
- Some events use past tense: "changed name", "created poll", "deleted poll"
- Some use present tense: "register", "logout"
- Some use different formats: "trigger paywall", "click upgrade button"
- Some use underscores: "poll_id"
- Some use dots in properties but not in event names
The suggestion to standardize the event naming is valid and would improve analytics consistency.
Examples of inconsistencies:
changed namevsregistercreated pollvsclick upgrade buttonturned notifications onvstrigger paywall🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
196-202: Consider standardizing event name format.The analytics implementation is solid, capturing relevant context without PII. However, consider using a consistent format for event names across the application (e.g., "participant_name_changed" or "participant.name.changed" depending on your naming convention).
Let's check the event naming convention used in other files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PostHog event captures to verify naming conventions rg -A 1 "posthog.*capture\(" --type typescriptLength of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PostHog event captures using ripgrep without file type filter rg -A 1 "posthog.*capture\("Length of output: 5801
apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll.tsx (1)
Line range hint
252-257: Consider centralizing analytics event tracking.The PostHog event tracking for paywall triggers is implemented correctly, but the analytics events could be more consistent and maintainable.
Consider creating a dedicated analytics service:
// src/services/analytics.ts export const Analytics = { triggerPaywall: (params: { pollId: string; action: string; from: string; }) => { posthog?.capture("trigger paywall", params); }, // Add other analytics events here };Then update the usage:
-posthog?.capture("trigger paywall", { - poll_id: poll.id, - from: "manage-poll", - action: "finalize", -}); +Analytics.triggerPaywall({ + pollId: poll.id, + from: "manage-poll", + action: "finalize", +});This approach would:
- Centralize analytics event definitions
- Ensure consistent event naming and parameters
- Make it easier to track and modify analytics events
Also applies to: 270-275
apps/web/src/components/discussion/discussion.tsx (1)
Line range hint
196-201: Consider enriching the delete comment event with additional properties.While the event tracking is correctly implemented, consider adding more context to the event for better analytics:
onSuccess: () => { - posthog?.capture("deleted comment"); + posthog?.capture("deleted comment", { + commentLength: comment.content.length, + timeToDelete: Date.now() - new Date(comment.createdAt).getTime(), + authorType: comment.userId ? 'registered' : 'guest' + }); },apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/webhook.ts (3)
Line range hint
75-78: Add a return statement after sending the error response in the default caseIn the
defaultcase of the switch statement, after sending the 400 error response withres.status(400).json({ error: "Unhandled event type" });, there is noreturnstatement. This may lead tores.end();being called after the response has already been sent, potentially causing unexpected behavior or errors.Apply this diff to add a
returnstatement:default: res.status(400).json({ error: "Unhandled event type", }); + return;
Line range hint
45-49: Handle potential parsing errors when extractinguserIdfrom checkout session metadataWhen parsing
checkoutSession.metadatausingcheckoutMetadataSchema.parse(), any missing or invaliduserIdwill cause an exception, resulting in an unhandled promise rejection and a server error. The subsequent checkif (!userId)is redundant because the parsing will fail before this point ifuserIdis missing.Wrap the parsing logic in a try-catch block to handle exceptions gracefully:
const checkoutSession = event.data.object as Stripe.Checkout.Session; - const { userId } = checkoutMetadataSchema.parse(checkoutSession.metadata); - - if (!userId) { - res.status(400).send("Missing client reference ID"); - return; - } + let userId: string; + try { + const parsedMetadata = checkoutMetadataSchema.parse(checkoutSession.metadata); + userId = parsedMetadata.userId; + } catch (e) { + res.status(400).send("Invalid or missing user ID in session metadata"); + return; + }
Line range hint
99-109: Ensure proper handling after catching exceptions when parsing subscription metadataIn the
customer.subscription.*event handlers, if parsingsubscription.metadatafails, the error is logged to Sentry, but the code continues execution. This could result in attempting to capture a PostHog event with an undefineddistinctId, leading to further errors.Add a
returnstatement after catching the exception to prevent executing code that depends on a validuserId:try { const data = subscriptionMetadataSchema.parse(subscription.metadata); posthog?.capture({ event: "subscription change", distinctId: data.userId, properties: { type: event.type, $set: { tier: isActive ? "pro" : "hobby", }, }, }); } catch (e) { Sentry.captureException(e); + return; }apps/web/src/auth.ts (2)
Line range hint
267-273: Potential security issue with guest user ID prefixThe code assumes that guest user IDs start with
'user-'. Ensure that this prefix does not conflict with regular user IDs to prevent unauthorized access or privilege escalation.Consider updating the guest user ID prefix to a unique value that cannot collide with regular user IDs. For example:
- id: `user-${randomid()}`, + id: `guest-${randomid()}`,And update the corresponding check:
- if (token.sub?.startsWith("user-")) { + if (token.sub?.startsWith("guest-")) {
270-270: Duplicate assignment of 'locale' propertyThere is a redundant assignment of
session.user.localein the session callback.Remove the duplicate line to improve code clarity:
// If the user is a guest, we don't need to fetch them from the database if (token.sub?.startsWith("user-")) { session.user.id = token.sub as string; - session.user.locale = token.locale; session.user.timeFormat = token.timeFormat; session.user.timeZone = token.timeZone; session.user.locale = token.locale; session.user.weekStart = token.weekStart; return session; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
apps/web/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/delete-account-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-picture.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/sidebar.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(auth)/login/login-form.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/auth/login/login-page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/duplicate-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/components/logout-button.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/providers.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth.ts(3 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/session-provider.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/create-poll.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/discussion/discussion.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/forms/poll-settings.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/participant-dropdown.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/delete-poll-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/mutations.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/notifications-toggle.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/upgrade-button.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/src/contexts/posthog.tsx(0 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/webhook.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/trpc/routers/auth.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/utils/posthog.ts(0 hunks)packages/eslint-config/react.js(1 hunks)packages/posthog/.eslintrc.js(1 hunks)packages/posthog/package.json(1 hunks)packages/posthog/src/client/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/posthog/src/client/provider.tsx(1 hunks)packages/posthog/src/server/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/posthog/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apps/web/src/contexts/posthog.tsx
- apps/web/src/utils/posthog.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- packages/posthog/.eslintrc.js
- packages/posthog/package.json
- packages/posthog/src/client/index.ts
- packages/posthog/tsconfig.json
🔇 Additional comments (48)
apps/web/src/pages/api/auth/[...nextauth].ts (1)
1-1: Verify consistent usage of the new import path.
Let's ensure all PostHog server-side imports have been updated to use the new package path.
✅ Verification successful
All PostHog server imports are consistently using the new package path
The search results confirm that all server-side PostHog imports are using the new @rallly/posthog/server path consistently across the codebase. No instances of the old @/app/posthog import path were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining local PostHog imports that should be updated
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!*.md' '@/app/posthog'
# Search for consistency in server-side PostHog imports
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!*.md' '@rallly/posthog/server'
Length of output: 659
packages/eslint-config/react.js (2)
1-4: LGTM! Well-documented ESLint configuration function.
The function is properly typed with JSDoc annotation and follows good practices for module exports.
7-19: Verify ESLint plugin dependencies.
The configuration looks good and follows best practices. However, ensure that the following peer dependencies are included in the package.json:
- eslint-plugin-react
- eslint-plugin-react-hooks
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are properly configured ✅
Both eslint-plugin-react and eslint-plugin-react-hooks are correctly listed as devDependencies in the package.json file with appropriate version constraints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if required ESLint plugins are listed as dependencies
# Test: Search for ESLint plugin dependencies in package.json
echo "Checking package.json for required dependencies..."
jq -r '.dependencies + .peerDependencies | keys[]' packages/eslint-config/package.json | grep -E 'eslint-plugin-(react|react-hooks)'
Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the content of package.json
echo "Content of package.json:"
cat packages/eslint-config/package.json
# Also check if these plugins are mentioned anywhere in the file
echo -e "\nGrepping for react plugins in package.json:"
grep -i "eslint-plugin-react" packages/eslint-config/package.json
Length of output: 909
apps/web/src/app/components/logout-button.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM! Import path change aligns with package centralization.
The change to import from @rallly/posthog/client aligns well with the PR's objective of centralizing PostHog analytics integration.
packages/posthog/src/client/provider.tsx (1)
16-29: Verify security configuration for production.
Please ensure:
- The
NEXT_PUBLIC_POSTHOG_API_HOSTpoints to your self-hosted instance or PostHog Cloud in production - Session recording and heatmaps are correctly disabled as they might capture sensitive data
- The
persistence: "memory"setting means tracking data isn't persisted across page reloads - verify if this is intended - Consider adding a data processing agreement notice if required by privacy regulations
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the environment variable validation and configuration by checking the environment setup and validation code.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide a final response:
Security configuration appears to be properly implemented
The implementation shows good security practices:
- Environment variables are properly validated with
z.string().url()for the API host - PostHog configuration has security-conscious defaults:
- Session recording and heatmaps are disabled
- Memory-only persistence prevents data leaks
- Autocapture is disabled to prevent unintended data collection
- Environment variables are properly typed and validated in both web and landing apps
The current implementation aligns with the security concerns raised in the review comment. The memory-only persistence is intentional as it provides an additional security layer by not persisting tracking data across sessions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any hardcoded PostHog configuration
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!*.md' 'posthog.*init|POSTHOG_|ph_'
# Verify environment variable usage in Next.js config
fd -g 'next.config.*' --exec cat {} \; | grep -i posthog
Length of output: 1435
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check environment validation logic
ast-grep --pattern 'z.string().url().$$$'
# Check for any PostHog configuration in environment files
fd -g '.env*' --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 373
apps/web/src/components/upgrade-button.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Verify bundle size impact.
The import change aligns with the centralization of PostHog integration. However, let's verify that this package-based approach doesn't significantly impact the bundle size.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the package configuration and its impact.
Let me try one more verification with corrected syntax:
Import change is well-structured and safe
The package is properly configured with explicit exports and the client module is correctly re-exporting the PostHog React hook from the official package. The change from local utility to package import is safe because:
- Package has proper exports configuration
- No side effects are declared (null)
- Direct re-export of official PostHog React hook
- No other files are still using the old import path
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the package is properly configured for tree-shaking
# Look for sideEffects configuration in package.json
fd -t f "package.json" -x jq -r 'select(.name == "@rallly/posthog") | .sideEffects'
Length of output: 650
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for module type and exports configuration
fd -t f "package.json" -x jq -r 'select(.name == "@rallly/posthog") | {type,exports,module,main}'
# Look for the actual package location and its build configuration
fd -t f -p "@rallly/posthog/.*" --full-path
# Check if the client import is properly exported
rg -l "export.*usePostHog" -g "**/posthog/**"
Length of output: 3963
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the package configuration and client implementation
cat packages/posthog/package.json
# Look at the client implementation
cat packages/posthog/src/client/index.ts
# Check if there are any other files importing from the old path
rg -l "@/utils/posthog"
Length of output: 605
apps/web/src/pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Good refactor moving PostHog handler to a dedicated package.
The change to import posthogApiHandler from @rallly/posthog/server aligns well with the goal of centralizing PostHog-related code into a dedicated package.
Also applies to: 7-7
Line range hint 46-46: Verify the handler composition order.
The current order (TRPC → PostHog) means PostHog will receive all requests, including failed ones. This might be intentional for analytics purposes, but please verify this is the desired behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the implementation of the composeApiHandlers function to understand how it processes the handlers.
Let me check the implementation of the PostHog handler to understand how it processes the requests.
Let me try a different approach to find the PostHog handler implementation.
Let me try one final search to locate the PostHog handler.
Based on the implementation of composeApiHandlers and the PostHog handler, I can now provide a definitive response about the handler composition order.
The handler composition order is correct and intentional.
The posthogApiHandler is designed to flush PostHog events and its placement after the TRPC handler is appropriate because:
- The
posthogApiHandlerimplementation only handles event flushing:
export function posthogApiHandler() {
try {
waitUntil(Promise.all([posthog?.shutdown()]));
} catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to flush PostHog events:", error);
}
}-
The actual PostHog event capturing is done within the TRPC handlers themselves, as evidenced by numerous
posthog?.capture()calls throughout the codebase. -
The
composeApiHandlersexecutes handlers sequentially and stops ifres.writableEndedis true, ensuring proper response handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are other instances of handler composition to confirm consistency
rg "composeApiHandlers" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 2177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of composeApiHandlers
cat apps/web/src/utils/next.ts
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and check the PostHog handler implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const posthogApiHandler'
Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog handler implementation using ripgrep
rg "posthogApiHandler.*=" -A 5
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any PostHog related code
rg "posthog" -i --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 49984
apps/web/src/app/providers.tsx (2)
34-38: LGTM! Clean provider hierarchy.
The new provider hierarchy is well-structured and properly nested. Moving session management to layout.tsx while keeping UserProvider and ConnectedDayjsProvider here maintains a clean separation of concerns.
34-38: Verify session-dependent components.
The removal of SessionProvider from this hierarchy might affect components that depend on session context. Let's verify there are no components that relied on the previous provider order.
✅ Verification successful
Session management has been properly migrated
The verification shows that the removal of SessionProvider from providers.tsx is correct as:
- Session management has been moved to layout.tsx (found in apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx)
- The UserProvider (apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx) correctly uses the session through
useSessionhook - All session-dependent components are still able to access the session context through the new provider hierarchy
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might depend on session context
# Look for useSession hooks or session-related imports
rg -l "useSession|getSession|SessionProvider" --type tsx --type ts
# Look for direct session access patterns
rg "session\." --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might depend on session context without file type restrictions
rg -l "useSession|getSession|SessionProvider"
# Look for direct session access patterns
rg "session\." -C 2
# Search for any imports from next-auth
rg "from ['\"]next-auth"
# Look for any auth-related hooks or components
rg "useAuth|AuthProvider"
Length of output: 11500
apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/delete-poll-dialog.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Verify package configuration.
The import change aligns with the PR objective of centralizing PostHog analytics.
Let's verify the package setup:
✅ Verification successful
Import change is properly configured and consistent
The verification shows that:
- The PostHog package is properly set up as a workspace package with correct dependencies (
posthog-jsandposthog-node) - The PostHog provider is correctly implemented and used at the root layout level
- The import pattern
@rallly/posthog/clientis consistently used across 18 components - The package exports are properly configured for both client and server usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog package configuration
# Test 1: Check if package is properly configured in next.config.js
echo "Checking Next.js configuration..."
rg -l "posthog" next.config.js
# Test 2: Verify consistent import pattern across codebase
echo "Checking import consistency..."
rg "from ['\"]@rallly/posthog/client['\"]"
Length of output: 2161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the PostHog package configuration in the monorepo
echo "Checking package.json files..."
fd package.json --exec cat {}
# Check PostHog provider setup
echo "Checking PostHog provider setup..."
ast-grep --pattern 'PostHogProvider'
Length of output: 12779
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/duplicate-dialog.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import path aligned with centralized PostHog package
The change to import from @rallly/posthog/client aligns with the centralization of PostHog analytics integration.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/auth/login/login-page.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Consistent import path update
The import path change aligns with the centralization of PostHog integration across the application.
Line range hint 24-39: Enhance error handling and data validation
While the PostHog integration works, there are several areas that could be improved:
- Add error handling for PostHog identification
- Validate user data before sending to PostHog
- Consider the privacy implications of sharing user data
- Ensure all async operations complete before navigation
Consider refactoring to:
onSuccess: async (data) => {
if (!data.url.includes("auth/error")) {
// if login was successful, update the session
const updatedSession = await session.update();
- if (updatedSession) {
+ if (updatedSession?.user?.id) {
// identify the user in posthog
- posthog?.identify(updatedSession.user.id, {
- email: updatedSession.user.email,
- name: updatedSession.user.name,
- });
+ try {
+ await posthog?.identify(updatedSession.user.id, {
+ email: updatedSession.user.email,
+ name: updatedSession.user.name,
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Failed to identify user in PostHog:", error);
+ // Consider if this should block navigation
+ }
await trpcUtils.invalidate();
}
+ // Ensure all operations are complete before navigation
+ await Promise.all([
+ trpcUtils.invalidate(),
+ // Add other async operations here
+ ]);
}
router.push(data.url);
},Let's verify the privacy policy compliance:
apps/web/src/components/poll/mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint 22-39: Analytics implementation looks solid!
The PostHog event tracking is well-implemented across all mutations:
- Events have descriptive names: "add participant", "update participant", "remove participant", "updated poll"
- Relevant properties are captured for each event
- Analytics are triggered after successful operations
- Proper optimistic updates and cache invalidation are in place
Also applies to: 40-60, 61-82, 83-95
1-1: Verify the migration to the new PostHog package path.
The import path change from @/utils/posthog to @rallly/posthog/client is part of centralizing PostHog analytics. Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Migration to @rallly/posthog/client is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old import path
@/utils/posthogremain in the codebase - The new import path
@rallly/posthog/clientis consistently used across 18 files in the web application
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog import consistency and identify any remaining old imports
# Test 1: Check for any remaining old PostHog imports
echo "Checking for old PostHog imports..."
rg -l "@/utils/posthog"
# Test 2: Verify new PostHog imports are used consistently
echo "Verifying new PostHog imports..."
rg -l "@rallly/posthog/client"
Length of output: 1130
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/auth.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Appropriate use of server-side PostHog import
The change to use @rallly/posthog/server is correct for this server-side context.
Line range hint 109-122: Review analytics implementation for security and reliability
Several concerns about the PostHog event tracking implementation:
- Consider error handling for cases where PostHog is undefined
- Review the necessity of including sensitive user data in analytics
- Verify the usage of
$setoperator as it permanently updates user properties - Consider using a more specific event name (e.g., "user_registered" or "auth.user_registered")
Let's verify the PostHog event naming conventions and sensitive data handling across the codebase:
Consider refactoring to:
- posthog?.capture({
+ try {
+ posthog?.capture({
- event: "register",
+ event: "user_registered",
distinctId: user.id,
properties: {
$set: {
- email: user.email,
- name: user.name,
+ user_id: user.id,
timeZone: input.timeZone,
locale: input.locale,
},
},
- });
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Log error but don't block registration
+ console.error("Failed to track registration event:", error);
+ }apps/web/next.config.js (2)
26-26: Please clarify the addition of @rallly/emails package.
The addition of @rallly/emails to transpilePackages appears unrelated to the PostHog integration. Could you explain the reason for this change?
Let's check if this is part of a larger change:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check context for emails package addition
# Test 1: Check if package exists and recent changes
fd -t d "emails$" packages/
# Test 2: Look for related changes in email functionality
rg -t js -t tsx "from ['|\"]@rallly/emails"25-25: LGTM! PostHog package configuration looks correct.
The addition of @rallly/posthog to transpilePackages aligns with the PostHog analytics integration objective.
Let's verify the package structure:
✅ Verification successful
PostHog package configuration is correctly set up
The verification confirms that:
- The
@rallly/posthogpackage exists in the packages directory with proper structure - It's correctly listed as a dependency in
apps/web/package.json - The package includes both
posthog-jsandposthog-nodedependencies - The transpilePackages configuration in
next.config.jsis necessary for proper package usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog package setup and usage
# Test 1: Check if package exists
fd -t d "posthog$" packages/
# Test 2: Verify imports from this package
rg -t js -t tsx "from ['|\"]@rallly/posthog"
Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify PostHog setup
# Check if posthog package exists in packages directory
ls -la packages/posthog
# Look for PostHog-related files and imports with ripgrep
rg -t js "from.*posthog"
rg -t js "import.*posthog"
# Check package.json files for PostHog dependencies
fd "package.json" | xargs rg "posthog"
# Look for PostHog configuration or initialization
rg -t js "PostHog|posthog" -A 3
Length of output: 897
apps/web/package.json (2)
34-34: LGTM! Good move centralizing PostHog dependencies.
The shift from direct PostHog dependencies to a centralized @rallly/posthog package is a good architectural decision that will make analytics integration more maintainable.
34-34: Verify workspace package configuration.
Let's ensure the @rallly/posthog package is properly configured in the workspace.
✅ Verification successful
Package configuration is correctly set up
The @rallly/posthog package is properly configured in the workspace:
- Located at
packages/posthogand correctly declared with the package name - Included in the workspace through the root
workspacesconfiguration["packages/*"] - Referenced appropriately in
apps/web/package.json - Exports both server and client interfaces with proper dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the workspace package setup for @rallly/posthog
# Test 1: Check if package.json exists in the expected location
echo "Checking for posthog package..."
fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -l "\"name\": \"@rallly/posthog\""
# Test 2: Verify package is listed in workspace configuration
echo "Checking workspace configuration..."
fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -l "\"workspaces\""
Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the workspace configuration and package details
# Check workspace configuration in root package.json
echo "Root package.json workspace configuration:"
cat package.json | jq '.workspaces'
# Check posthog package details
echo -e "\nPosthog package details:"
cat packages/posthog/package.json
# Check if there are any other references to @rallly/posthog in the workspace
echo -e "\nOther references to @rallly/posthog:"
fd --type f "package.json" --exec grep -l "@rallly/posthog"
Length of output: 861
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/delete-account-dialog.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import path updated to use centralized package
The change aligns with the PR objective of centralizing PostHog integration into a dedicated package.
apps/web/src/components/user-provider.tsx (4)
2-2: LGTM: Centralized PostHog import
The import from a centralized package path follows good practices for managing third-party integrations.
128-128: LGTM: Clean children rendering
The simplified children rendering maintains functionality while reducing component nesting.
68-80: Review PII handling and effect dependencies
Two concerns with the PostHog identification implementation:
- Sending PII data (email) to PostHog - ensure this aligns with your privacy policy and data handling requirements.
- The dependency array is incomplete and suppressed with an ESLint comment. Consider including all used variables:
- // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
- }, [user?.id]);
+ }, [user?.id, user?.email, user?.name, tier, user?.timeZone, user?.image, user?.locale, i18n.language, posthog]);Run this script to verify privacy policy requirements:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for privacy policy documentation
fd -g "*privacy*.{md,mdx}" -g "*PRIVACY*.{md,mdx}"65-66: Consider handling subscription data edge cases
While the tier determination logic is clear, consider handling cases where subscription data might be undefined or in an error state.
apps/web/src/components/poll/notifications-toggle.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Import change aligns with centralized PostHog integration.
The change from local utility to @rallly/posthog/client package is consistent with the PR's objective of centralizing PostHog analytics.
apps/web/src/components/create-poll.tsx (1)
2-2: Verify consistent PostHog import across the codebase.
The import change from local utility to package import looks good and aligns with the centralization effort.
Let's verify that all PostHog imports are consistently using the new package:
✅ Verification successful
PostHog imports are consistently using the new package path
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old import path
@/utils/posthogwere found - All PostHog imports consistently use the new package path
@rallly/posthog/client - The migration appears to be complete across all components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining local PostHog utility imports
# Expected: No results from old import path, confirming complete migration
echo "Checking for old PostHog imports..."
rg "from \"@/utils/posthog\""
echo "Verifying new PostHog imports..."
rg "from \"@rallly/posthog/client\""
Length of output: 2101
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-picture.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM! Good practices for imports and type validation
The centralization of PostHog imports and the use of zod for MIME type validation demonstrate good architectural decisions.
Also applies to: 13-13
Line range hint 110-132: LGTM! Clean implementation of avatar removal
The component follows good practices with proper loading state management and error handling.
Line range hint 164-176: LGTM! Clean and well-structured component
The component is well-organized with proper conditional rendering for cloud-hosted environments.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/sidebar.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import path updated to use centralized package
The change to import from @rallly/posthog/client aligns with the centralization of PostHog analytics integration across the application.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(auth)/login/login-form.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: PostHog import path updated.
The import path change to "@rallly/posthog/client" aligns with the centralized package structure being implemented across the application.
apps/web/src/components/forms/poll-settings.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM! Good architectural decision.
Moving the PostHog integration to a dedicated package (@rallly/posthog/client) improves maintainability and provides better separation of concerns.
Line range hint 146-156: LGTM! Well-structured analytics implementation.
The implementation consistently tracks paywall triggers for pro features while maintaining a good separation between free and pro functionality.
Also applies to: 182-192, 218-228
Line range hint 146-156: Verify consistency of analytics tracking across the codebase.
Let's ensure the paywall tracking pattern is consistent across other components.
Also applies to: 182-192, 218-228
✅ Verification successful
Analytics tracking is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that the paywall tracking implementation in poll-settings.tsx follows a consistent pattern across the codebase:
-
All paywall triggers use the same event name "trigger paywall" with consistent payload structure:
manage-poll.tsx: includespoll_id,from, andactionpoll-settings.tsx: includessettingandfromsidebar.tsx: includesfrom
-
The implementation follows the same pattern across all premium features:
- Uses
usePlan()hook to check plan status - Triggers paywall dialog when
plan === "free" - Captures analytics event with contextual information
- Uses
The PostHog tracking implementation is well-structured and consistent throughout the application, with proper event naming conventions and contextual data capture.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other paywall tracking implementations
echo "Checking paywall tracking patterns:"
rg -A 2 "trigger paywall" --type typescript
echo "\nChecking PostHog capture patterns:"
rg "posthog.*capture" --type typescript
Length of output: 321
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other paywall tracking implementations with correct file extensions
echo "Checking paywall tracking patterns:"
rg -A 2 "trigger paywall" -t ts -t tsx
echo "\nChecking PostHog capture patterns:"
rg "posthog\.capture" -t ts -t tsx
# Search for other analytics-related patterns
echo "\nChecking other analytics patterns:"
rg "(analytics|track|event)" -t ts -t tsx --glob "src/**/{hooks,utils}/**"
Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for analytics patterns without file type restrictions
echo "Checking paywall and analytics patterns:"
find . -type f -name "*.ts*" -exec grep -l "posthog" {} \;
# Look for analytics-related files
echo "\nLooking for analytics-related files:"
fd -e ts -e tsx "(analytics|tracking|event)"
# Search for PostHog imports and usage
echo "\nChecking PostHog imports and usage:"
rg "import.*posthog|from.*posthog"
Length of output: 5224
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage patterns in poll-settings.tsx and other key components
echo "Checking PostHog usage in poll-settings.tsx:"
rg -A 5 "usePostHog" apps/web/src/components/forms/poll-settings.tsx
echo "\nChecking PostHog usage patterns in other components:"
rg -A 5 "posthog\.capture|trigger paywall" apps/web/src/components/forms/poll-settings.tsx apps/web/src/components/upgrade-button.tsx apps/web/src/components/create-poll.tsx
# Look for any paywall-related code
echo "\nChecking paywall-related patterns:"
rg -A 5 "pro[\"']|isPro|upgrade" apps/web/src/components/forms/poll-settings.tsx
Length of output: 2598
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check other components for similar paywall tracking patterns
echo "Checking paywall tracking in other components:"
rg -A 5 "trigger paywall" apps/web/src/components/
# Check for consistent event naming patterns
echo "\nChecking PostHog event naming patterns:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "posthog.*capture\(" apps/web/src/
# Look for other pro/premium feature triggers
echo "\nChecking other premium feature triggers:"
rg -A 5 "paywallDialog|usePlan|plan === \"free\"" apps/web/src/components/
Length of output: 25203
apps/web/src/components/participant-dropdown.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import path updated correctly.
The import path change aligns with the centralization of PostHog analytics functionality into a dedicated package.
apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Verify consistent PostHog import usage.
The migration to @rallly/posthog/client aligns with the centralization effort.
Let's verify consistent usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
✅ PostHog import migration successfully verified
The verification shows:
- No instances of old imports from
@/utils/posthogwere found - The new
@rallly/posthog/clientimport is consistently used across 18 files - All PostHog-related functionality is properly centralized through the new package
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old PostHog imports and verify new import adoption
# Test 1: Check for any remaining old imports
echo "Checking for old PostHog imports..."
rg -l "from ['\"]@/utils/posthog['\"]"
# Test 2: Verify new package adoption
echo "Verifying new package adoption..."
rg -l "from ['\"]@rallly/posthog/client['\"]"
Length of output: 1174
apps/web/src/components/discussion/discussion.tsx (2)
Line range hint 89-93: LGTM: PostHog event tracking for comment creation.
The PostHog event tracking is well-placed in the success callback and maintains proper error handling.
2-2: Verify the PostHog import path change across the codebase.
The import path change from local utils to the centralized package looks good, but let's ensure consistency across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog import path migration is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old import path
@/utils/posthogremain in the codebase - The new import path
@rallly/posthog/clientis consistently used across 18 files - All PostHog-related imports are using the centralized package as intended
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old PostHog import paths and verify new import usage
echo "Checking for old PostHog import paths..."
rg "from \"@/utils/posthog\""
echo "Verifying new PostHog import usage..."
rg "from \"@rallly/posthog/client\""
Length of output: 2121
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (3)
27-27: Conversion of Root Component to Async Function
Changing the Root component to an async function is appropriate for server-side data fetching. This allows you to await getServerSession() and provides session data during server-side rendering.
34-34: Fetching Session Data with getServerSession
Using const session = await getServerSession(); correctly retrieves the session data on the server side. This ensures that session information is available when rendering the component.
39-46:
Ensure Providers Handle Undefined Session or User ID
When passing session to SessionProvider and session?.user?.id to PostHogProvider, ensure that both providers can handle cases where session or session.user.id may be undefined (e.g., when the user is not authenticated). This prevents potential runtime errors.
Consider adding conditional logic or default values to handle undefined cases. For example:
<SessionProvider session={session}>
- <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id}>
+ <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id || 'anonymous'}>
<Providers>
{children}
<TimeZoneChangeDetector />
</Providers>
</PostHogProvider>
</SessionProvider>apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/webhook.ts (1)
4-4: Import statement updated correctly
The import path for posthog and posthogApiHandler has been updated to @rallly/posthog/server, which reflects the new centralized package structure. This change ensures consistency across the application.
apps/web/src/auth.ts (2)
2-2: Import PostHog server version correctly
The import statement has been updated to import posthog from @rallly/posthog/server, which aligns with the server-side usage in this file.
26-27: Ensure correct paths for custom adapters
The imports for CustomPrismaAdapter and mergeGuestsIntoUser are now using relative paths. Verify that these modules exist at the specified locations and that the paths are correct.
Run the following script to check if the files exist:
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are correct and files exist
The relative imports in apps/web/src/auth.ts are correct. Both files exist at the expected locations:
./auth/custom-prisma-adapter.ts./auth/merge-user.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the imported modules exist at the specified paths.
# Test: Check for the presence of custom-prisma-adapter.ts and merge-user.ts in the auth directory.
fd -E 'node_modules' -I 'custom-prisma-adapter.ts' ./auth
fd -E 'node_modules' -I 'merge-user.ts' ./auth
Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search from the repository root and check the full path context
fd -E 'node_modules' -I 'custom-prisma-adapter.ts'
fd -E 'node_modules' -I 'merge-user.ts'
# Also search for any files with similar names in case of typos or different extensions
fd -E 'node_modules' -I 'custom.*prisma.*adapter'
fd -E 'node_modules' -I 'merge.*user'
# Let's also check the directory structure around the importing file
ls -la apps/web/src/auth/
Length of output: 675
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls.ts (1)
3-3: Correctly import PostHog server module.
The import statement has been updated to import posthog from the server-specific module, which is appropriate for server-side analytics tracking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/posthog/package.json (1)
9-13: Consider adding type definitions to exports.The exports field correctly defines the package entry points, but you might want to consider adding corresponding type definition files.
"exports": { - "./server": "./src/server/index.ts", - "./client": "./src/client/index.ts", - "./next": "./src/next.ts" + "./server": { + "types": "./src/server/index.d.ts", + "default": "./src/server/index.ts" + }, + "./client": { + "types": "./src/client/index.d.ts", + "default": "./src/client/index.ts" + }, + "./next": { + "types": "./src/next.d.ts", + "default": "./src/next.ts" + } }packages/posthog/src/next.ts (1)
7-11: Consider adding TypeScript types for better type safety.While the code works, adding explicit types would improve maintainability and catch potential issues earlier.
-export default function PostHogPageView() { +export default function PostHogPageView(): JSX.Element { const pathname = usePathname(); const searchParams = useSearchParams(); - const posthog = usePostHog(); + const posthog = usePostHog(); // PostHog type should be imported from posthog-js const previousUrl = React.useRef<string | null>(null);apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1)
16-18: LGTM: Appropriate use of dynamic import for analytics.The dynamic import with SSR disabled is the correct approach for client-side analytics initialization.
Consider adding error boundaries around analytics components to ensure your application remains functional even if analytics initialization fails.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx(2 hunks)packages/posthog/package.json(1 hunks)packages/posthog/src/next.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/posthog/package.json (2)
1-4: LGTM! Package metadata follows best practices.
The package is properly scoped under the @rallly organization and marked as private, which is appropriate for internal packages.
14-21: Verify PostHog version compatibility.
The package uses specific versions of PostHog dependencies. Let's verify there are no known issues with these versions.
Also, ensure that the peer dependency on Next.js 14.2.13 aligns with your application's version.
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show a discrepancy between the package.json version (4.2.1) and the latest release shown (1.3.0) for posthog-node. We need to verify the actual version being used and check the usage patterns to ensure compatibility. Additionally, we'll examine how these dependencies are being imported in the codebase.
The previous results confirmed the package versions in package.json but we need to verify:
- The actual existence of posthog-node@4.2.1 as it wasn't shown in GitHub releases
- How these dependencies are being used in the codebase
- The import patterns that might be using different syntax
PostHog dependencies are verified and compatible
The verification shows that:
- posthog-node@4.2.1 exists in npm registry and is being used correctly with proper initialization and shutdown handling
- posthog-js@1.180.1 is the latest version (released 2024-11-01) and is properly integrated via React hooks
- Both packages are actively used throughout the codebase for analytics tracking with proper server/client separation
- The implementation follows PostHog's best practices for Next.js integration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any security advisories or breaking changes in the PostHog dependencies
# Test: Check for any security advisories for posthog-js and posthog-node
echo "Checking for security advisories..."
npm audit --package-lock-only --json posthog-js@1.180.1 posthog-node@4.2.1
# Test: Check the changelog or release notes
echo "Fetching latest releases..."
gh release list --repo PostHog/posthog-js --limit 5
gh release list --repo PostHog/posthog-node --limit 5
Length of output: 1303
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual version of posthog-node being used in the package.json
# as there seems to be a discrepancy between the listed version and available releases
cat packages/posthog/package.json
# Also check for any usage patterns of these dependencies
rg "from 'posthog-js'" -A 2
rg "from 'posthog-node'" -A 2
rg "require\(['\"]posthog-" -A 2
Length of output: 597
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for TypeScript/JavaScript files that might be importing these packages
fd -e ts -e js -x grep -l "posthog" {}
# Let's also verify if posthog-node 4.2.1 actually exists on npm
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/posthog-node | jq '.versions | keys[]' | grep "4.2"
# And check the actual content of the source files to understand usage
fd -e ts -e js -x cat {} | grep -A 5 -B 5 "posthog"
Length of output: 9849
packages/posthog/src/next.ts (3)
1-6: LGTM! Clean imports and client-side setup.
The imports are well-organized and the "use client" directive is correctly placed for client-side rendering.
28-29: LGTM! Appropriate null return for tracking-only component.
The component correctly returns null as it's purely for tracking purposes.
1-29: Verify PostHog setup and component usage.
Let's ensure proper PostHog initialization and consistent usage of this tracking component.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual implementation details to ensure there are no duplicate tracking issues.
PostHog setup and tracking implementation is correctly configured
The implementation is properly structured with no duplicate tracking concerns:
- PostHog is initialized with
capture_pageview: falsein the provider PostHogPageViewcomponent is correctly placed withinPostHogProviderin the root layout- Page view tracking is centralized in the
PostHogPageViewcomponent - The component is loaded dynamically with
ssr: falseto ensure client-side only execution
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PostHog setup and component usage
# Check PostHog initialization
echo "Checking PostHog initialization..."
rg -l "PostHogProvider|posthog\.init"
# Check where this component is used
echo "\nChecking PostHogPageView usage..."
rg -l "PostHogPageView"
# Check for other page view tracking to avoid duplicates
echo "\nChecking for potential duplicate tracking..."
rg -l "capture.*pageview|capture.*\$pageview"
Length of output: 624
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation in provider.tsx for potential duplicate tracking
echo "Checking provider.tsx implementation:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "capture.*pageview|capture.*\$pageview" packages/posthog/src/client/provider.tsx
# Check layout.tsx to understand PostHog initialization and usage
echo "\nChecking layout.tsx implementation:"
cat apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx
Length of output: 2136
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and necessary.
The new imports support PostHog analytics integration and session management functionality.
Also applies to: 7-7, 13-14
44-52:
Improve PostHog integration for anonymous users.
The current implementation might not track anonymous users as no fallback distinctId is provided.
Let's verify if anonymous tracking is handled elsewhere:
Consider updating the PostHog configuration:
- <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id}>
+ <PostHogProvider
+ distinctId={session?.user?.id ?? 'anonymous_' + Math.random().toString(36).slice(2)}
+ options={{
+ capture_pageview: false // Already handled by PostHogPageView
+ }}
+ >
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
17-19: LGTM: Appropriate use of dynamic import for client-side analytics.Good practice using dynamic import with
ssr: falsefor analytics to:
- Prevent unnecessary server-side execution
- Avoid hydration mismatches
- Reduce initial bundle size
33-33: Consider enhancing error handling further.While basic error handling is implemented (addressing the previous review comment), consider these improvements:
- Type the error for better error handling
- Handle specific error cases differently
- Add retry mechanism for transient failures
let session: Session | null = null; try { session = await getServerSession(); } catch (error) { - console.error(error); + if (error instanceof Error) { + console.error('Session fetch failed:', error.message); + // Consider different handling based on error type + if (error.message.includes('network')) { + // Retry logic for network errors + } + } }Also applies to: 40-45
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and necessary.
The new imports support PostHog analytics integration and session management functionality.
Also applies to: 7-7, 9-9, 14-15
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx
Outdated
| <SessionProvider session={session}> | ||
| <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id}> | ||
| <PostHogPageView /> | ||
| <Providers> | ||
| {children} | ||
| <TimeZoneChangeDetector /> | ||
| </Providers> | ||
| </PostHogProvider> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance PostHog tracking with better type safety and anonymous user handling.
While the provider hierarchy is correct, consider:
- Adding type safety for the distinctId
- Providing a fallback for anonymous users
- <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id}>
+ <PostHogProvider
+ distinctId={
+ session?.user?.id ??
+ // Fallback to anonymous ID or device ID for non-authenticated users
+ `anon_${crypto.randomUUID()}`
+ }
+ >📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <SessionProvider session={session}> | |
| <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id}> | |
| <PostHogPageView /> | |
| <Providers> | |
| {children} | |
| <TimeZoneChangeDetector /> | |
| </Providers> | |
| </PostHogProvider> | |
| <SessionProvider session={session}> | |
| <PostHogProvider | |
| distinctId={ | |
| session?.user?.id ?? | |
| // Fallback to anonymous ID or device ID for non-authenticated users | |
| `anon_${crypto.randomUUID()}` | |
| } | |
| > | |
| <PostHogPageView /> | |
| <Providers> | |
| {children} | |
| <TimeZoneChangeDetector /> | |
| </Providers> | |
| </PostHogProvider> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/billing/loading.tsx (2)
3-5: Consider adding TypeScript type annotations.While the implementation is correct, adding proper TypeScript types would improve code maintainability and type safety.
-export default function Loading() { +export default function Loading(): JSX.Element { return <Spinner />; }
4-4: Enhance spinner accessibility.Consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility for screen readers.
- return <Spinner />; + return <Spinner aria-label="Loading billing settings" role="status" />;apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/preferences/loading.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean implementation of Next.js loading state.The implementation follows Next.js best practices for loading states and maintains consistency with other loading components across the application.
Consider implementing a shared loading component pattern if there are many similar loading states across the application. This could be achieved by creating a higher-order component or a custom hook that standardizes loading behavior and appearance.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/new/loading.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibility.The implementation follows Next.js best practices and aligns with the standardization of loading states across the application.
Consider enhancing accessibility by adding ARIA attributes:
- return <Spinner />; + return <Spinner aria-label="Loading content" role="status" />;apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/polls/loading.tsx (1)
1-5: Consider enhancing accessibility with ARIA attributes.The implementation follows Next.js conventions and is well-structured. However, we could improve accessibility for screen readers.
Consider adding an aria-label to provide context:
- return <Spinner />; + return <Spinner aria-label="Loading polls..." />;apps/web/src/auth/client/session-provider.tsx (1)
6-8: Consider adding JSDoc documentation.While the implementation is clean and correct, adding documentation would help explain:
- The purpose of this wrapper component
- Why it's preferred over using NextAuthSessionProvider directly
- Any future plans for extending functionality
Example improvement:
+/** + * SessionProvider wraps NextAuth's SessionProvider to provide a centralized point + * for session management customization. This abstraction allows for future + * enhancements without modifying consumer components. + */ export function SessionProvider(props: SessionProviderProps) { return <NextAuthSessionProvider {...props} />; }apps/web/src/auth/lib/create-guest-user.ts (1)
6-10: Consider adding input validation.While the function handles partial data well, consider adding validation for:
initialData.idformat if provided (should start with "user-")initialData.localeif provided (should be a valid locale string)export function createGuestUser(initialData: Partial<User>) { + if (initialData.id && !initialData.id.startsWith('user-')) { + throw new Error('User id must start with "user-"'); + } + + // Consider using a list of valid locales or a locale validation library + if (initialData.locale && !/^[a-z]{2}(-[A-Z]{2})?$/.test(initialData.locale)) { + throw new Error('Invalid locale format'); + } + const user: User = { id: initialData.id ?? `user-${randomid()}`, createdAt: new Date().toISOString(), locale: initialData.locale ?? "en", };apps/web/src/auth/client/guest-provider.tsx (3)
9-17: Consider memoizing the provider value.While the implementation is correct, React context consumers will re-render when the value prop changes. Consider memoizing the value to prevent unnecessary re-renders of children.
Here's how you could optimize it:
export function GuestProvider({ user, children, }: { user: User | null; children: React.ReactNode; }) { + const value = React.useMemo(() => user, [user]); - return <GuestContext.Provider value={user}>{children}</GuestContext.Provider>; + return <GuestContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</GuestContext.Provider>; }
19-21: Add runtime check for context usage.Consider adding a runtime check to ensure the hook is used within a provider context. This helps catch usage errors early in development.
Here's how you could add the safety check:
export function useGuestUser() { - return React.useContext(GuestContext); + const context = React.useContext(GuestContext); + if (context === undefined) { + throw new Error('useGuestUser must be used within a GuestProvider'); + } + return context; }
1-21: Good separation of guest user context.The separation of guest user context from authenticated user context follows good architectural principles. This design:
- Allows for independent management of guest user state
- Enables easy composition with other auth-related providers
- Facilitates clear boundaries between guest and authenticated user logic
Consider documenting the relationship between this provider and other auth-related providers (like UserProvider) to help other developers understand the complete auth architecture.
apps/web/src/app/global-error.tsx (1)
Line range hint
12-26: Consider enhancing error tracking and user experience.Since this PR introduces PostHog analytics, consider tracking error occurrences in PostHog alongside Sentry for better analytics correlation. Additionally, you might want to consider implementing a custom error page instead of using the generic NextError component to provide a better user experience.
Here's a suggested implementation:
"use client"; import * as Sentry from "@sentry/nextjs"; -import NextError from "next/error"; +import { usePostHog } from "@rallly/posthog/client"; import { useEffect } from "react"; export default function GlobalError({ error, }: { error: Error & { digest?: string }; }) { + const posthog = usePostHog(); + useEffect(() => { Sentry.captureException(error); + posthog?.capture("error_boundary_triggered", { + error: error.message, + digest: error.digest, + }); }, [error]); return ( <html> <body> - <NextError statusCode={0} /> + <div className="flex min-h-screen flex-col items-center justify-center p-4"> + <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold">Something went wrong!</h1> + <p className="mt-2 text-gray-600"> + We've been notified and are looking into it. + </p> + </div> </body> </html> ); }apps/web/src/auth/next.ts (1)
8-23: Add explicit return type and enhance error logging.The function has good security practices with schema validation and safe parsing, but could benefit from some improvements:
-export async function getGuestUserFromApiRequest(req: NextApiRequest) { +export async function getGuestUserFromApiRequest( + req: NextApiRequest +): Promise<z.infer<typeof userSchema> | null> { const cookie = req.cookies[GUEST_USER_COOKIE]; if (cookie) { try { const res = userSchema.safeParse(JSON.parse(cookie)); if (res.success) { return res.data; } + console.error("Guest user validation failed:", res.error); } catch (error) { - console.error("Error parsing guest user cookie", error); + console.error("Error parsing guest user cookie:", { + error, + cookieValue: cookie.substring(0, 100), // Log truncated value for debugging + }); } } return null; }apps/web/src/app/[locale]/invite/[urlId]/nav.tsx (1)
Line range hint
14-31: Add null check for user object to prevent runtime errors.The component assumes
useris always defined when accessinguser.id. Consider adding a null check to handle cases where the user might not be authenticated.export const Nav = () => { const poll = usePoll(); const { user } = useUser(); + const isOwner = user?.id === poll.userId; return ( <PageHeader variant="ghost"> <div className="flex justify-between"> <div> <Button variant="ghost" asChild - className={poll.userId !== user.id ? "hidden" : ""} + className={!isOwner ? "hidden" : ""} >apps/web/src/pages/[locale]/auth/disable-notifications.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-27: Strengthen the session validation check.While the optional chaining improves null safety, consider making the check more comprehensive to handle all possible edge cases.
- if (!session || session.user?.email === null) { + if (!session?.user?.email) {This change will catch
null,undefined, and empty string values in one concise check.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/guest-poll-alert.tsx (1)
Line range hint
21-42: Consider using more specific translation keys.While the translation implementation is correct, consider using more specific translation keys that follow a hierarchical structure for better organization and maintainability.
Consider this improvement:
- i18nKey="guestPollAlertTitle" + i18nKey="poll.guest.alert.title" - i18nKey="guestPollAlertDescription" + i18nKey="poll.guest.alert.description"apps/web/src/pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts (3)
25-28: Make the locale fallback chain more explicit.The current implementation could be more explicit about the locale fallback strategy.
- const locale = session?.user?.locale ?? guestUser?.locale; + const locale = session?.user?.locale ?? guestUser?.locale ?? 'en'; // or your default locale
30-31: Enhance unauthorized error logging.Consider adding more context to unauthorized errors for better debugging.
if (!id) { + console.warn('Unauthorized request:', { + hasSession: !!session, + hasGuestUser: !!guestUser + }); throw new TRPCError({ code: "UNAUTHORIZED" }); }
Line range hint
1-40: Consider implementing a user context factory.The current implementation mixes user resolution logic directly in the tRPC handler. Consider extracting this into a dedicated user context factory for better maintainability and reusability.
This would:
- Simplify testing of user resolution logic
- Make it easier to modify user context creation
- Allow reuse in other API routes
- Centralize error handling for user resolution
Would you like me to provide an example implementation of this pattern?
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1)
43-51: Consider enhancing error handling with specific error types.While basic error handling is in place, consider differentiating between different types of errors (e.g., network issues vs. authentication errors) for better debugging and monitoring.
try { session = await getServerSession(); guestUser = await getGuestUser(); } catch (error) { - console.error(error); + console.error( + 'Failed to initialize user session:', + error instanceof Error ? error.message : error + ); + // Consider reporting to error monitoring service + // reportError(error); }apps/web/src/middleware.ts (1)
Line range hint
14-73: Consider splitting middleware responsibilitiesThe middleware handles multiple concerns (auth routing, locale management, guest users, self-hosted restrictions), making it complex and harder to maintain. Consider splitting these into separate middleware functions for better maintainability and testing.
Example structure:
// auth.middleware.ts export const authMiddleware = withAuth(async (req) => { // Handle login/register redirects }); // locale.middleware.ts export const localeMiddleware = async (req) => { // Handle locale detection and routing }; // guest.middleware.ts export const guestMiddleware = async (req) => { // Handle guest user operations }; // middleware.ts export const middleware = chain([ authMiddleware, localeMiddleware, guestMiddleware, ]);Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this refactoring task?
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/invite/[urlId]/invite-page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
17-21: Add null checks for user object.The component assumes
useris always defined when accessinguser.id. This could lead to runtime errors if the user is not authenticated.Consider adding null checks:
const GoToApp = () => { const poll = usePoll(); const { user } = useUser(); - if (poll.userId !== user.id) { + if (!user || poll.userId !== user.id) { return null; }apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-settings.tsx (1)
13-13: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.Moving the user provider to a dedicated auth module improves code organization by domain and makes the codebase more maintainable.
apps/web/src/pages/_app.tsx (1)
14-14: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.Moving
UserProvidertoauth/clientdirectory improves code organization by properly grouping authentication-related components.apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/checkout.ts (2)
25-26: Consider consolidating user session validation.The current validation logic separately checks
userIdanduserSession.user?.email. Consider consolidating these checks for better maintainability.- const userId = userSession?.user?.id; - if (!userId || userSession.user?.email === null) { + const user = userSession?.user; + if (!user?.id || !user.email) {
Edge Runtime configuration needs to be removed for Stripe compatibility
The verification reveals that this API route cannot run on Edge Runtime due to:
- Usage of Stripe SDK which requires Node.js environment
- Direct access to
process.envin the Stripe initialization- Dependencies on Node.js-specific features through the Stripe SDK
Remove the
edge: trueconfiguration to ensure proper functionality with Stripe operations.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
8-10: Verify Edge Runtime compatibility with Stripe.The
edge: trueconfiguration indicates this API route runs on Edge Runtime. Ensure that all Stripe operations are compatible with Edge Runtime constraints.
Let me gather more information about the Stripe implementation to verify Edge Runtime compatibility.
Let me check the Stripe initialization and billing module implementation to ensure Edge Runtime compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other Stripe-related edge runtime configurations # Expected: Find consistent edge runtime usage across Stripe handlers # Look for other Stripe API routes fd "stripe" --type f --extension ts apps/web/src/pages/api # Check for edge runtime configuration in these files rg "edge:\s*true" --type ts apps/web/src/pages/api/stripeLength of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Stripe implementation details rg "stripe" -B 2 -A 2 apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/checkout.ts # Look for any Stripe SDK initialization or API calls rg "new Stripe|stripe\." --type ts apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/checkout.ts # Check for any Node.js specific APIs that might be incompatible with Edge Runtime rg "require\(|buffer|fs\.|process\." apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/checkout.tsLength of output: 889
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Stripe initialization in billing module rg -B 2 -A 2 "from \"@rallly/billing\"" --type ts # Look for Stripe initialization in billing module fd "billing" --type f --extension ts | xargs rg "new Stripe|stripe =" # Check for any environment variables usage related to Stripe rg "process\.env.*STRIPE" --type tsLength of output: 1406
apps/web/src/components/add-to-calendar-button.tsx (1)
Line range hint
12-124: Consider adding analytics tracking for calendar service selection.Since this PR introduces PostHog integration, it would be valuable to track which calendar services users prefer. This data could help prioritize calendar service support and understand user behavior.
Here's how you could add analytics tracking:
+ import { usePostHog } from "@rallly/posthog/client"; export function AddToCalendarButton({ title, description, location, start, duration, organizer, guests, }: { // ... props }) { + const posthog = usePostHog(); const calendarEvent: CalendarEvent = { // ... event config }; return ( <DropdownMenu> {/* ... menu trigger */} <DropdownMenuContent forceMount={true} align="start"> <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => { const res = google(calendarEvent); window.open(res, "_blank"); + posthog?.capture("calendar_service_selected", { service: "google" }); }} > {/* ... Google Calendar item */} </DropdownMenuItem> <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => { const res = office365(calendarEvent); window.open(res, "_blank"); + posthog?.capture("calendar_service_selected", { service: "office365" }); }} > {/* ... Microsoft 365 item */} </DropdownMenuItem> {/* Add similar tracking for other calendar services */} </DropdownMenuContent> </DropdownMenu> ); }apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
41-47: Consider enhancing user ID display format.The current implementation truncates the user ID to 10 characters. Consider using a more user-friendly format or adding a copy button for the full ID.
<Input className="w-full" - value={user.id.substring(0, 10)} + value={`${user.id.substring(0, 6)}...${user.id.substring(user.id.length - 4)}`} readOnly disabled /> +<Button + variant="ghost" + size="sm" + className="mt-2" + onClick={() => navigator.clipboard.writeText(user.id)} +> + <Trans i18nKey="copyId" defaults="Copy ID" /> +</Button>apps/web/src/auth/client/user-provider.tsx (2)
70-79: Consider simplifying user object construction.The user object construction could be more concise using object spread and nullish coalescing operators.
Consider this more maintainable approach:
- const user = { - id: authenticatedUser?.id ?? guestUser?.id, - name: authenticatedUser?.name, - email: authenticatedUser?.email, - timeZone: authenticatedUser?.timeZone ?? guestUser?.timeZone, - timeFormat: authenticatedUser?.timeFormat ?? guestUser?.timeFormat, - weekStart: authenticatedUser?.weekStart ?? guestUser?.weekStart, - image: authenticatedUser?.image, - locale: authenticatedUser?.locale ?? guestUser?.locale, - }; + const user = { + ...guestUser, + ...authenticatedUser, + id: authenticatedUser?.id ?? guestUser?.id, // Explicit ID handling for clarity + };
67-68: Enhance type safety for user state determination.The guest user detection logic could benefit from stronger typing.
Consider this more type-safe approach:
- const isGuest = !authenticatedUser?.email; + const isGuest = authenticatedUser?.email === undefined || authenticatedUser.email === null;Also, consider creating a type union for the tier:
type UserTier = "guest" | "hobby" | "pro"; const tier: UserTier = isGuest ? "guest" : subscription?.active ? "pro" : "hobby";apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-picture.tsx (2)
Line range hint
18-115: Consider these refinements to the file validation logic.The error handling and validation are robust, but we can improve the code by:
- Moving the file size limit to a named constant
- Reordering validations to check file type before size
+const MAX_FILE_SIZE = 2 * 1024 * 1024; // 2MB const handleFileChange = async ( event: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>, ) => { const file = event.target.files?.[0]; if (!file) return; const parsedFileType = allowedMimeTypes.safeParse(file.type); if (!parsedFileType.success) { toast({ title: t("invalidFileType", { defaultValue: "Invalid file type", }), description: t("invalidFileTypeDescription", { defaultValue: "Please upload a JPG or PNG file.", }), }); Sentry.captureMessage("Invalid file type", { level: "info", extra: { fileType: file.type, }, }); return; } const fileType = parsedFileType.data; - if (file.size > 2 * 1024 * 1024) { + if (file.size > MAX_FILE_SIZE) { toast({ title: t("fileTooLarge", { defaultValue: "File too large", }), description: t("fileTooLargeDescription", { defaultValue: "Please upload a file smaller than 2MB.", }), });
Line range hint
143-176: Consider adding error handling for analytics tracking.While the PostHog integration is good, consider wrapping the capture calls in try-catch blocks to ensure analytics failures don't affect the user experience.
<ChangeAvatarButton onSuccess={() => { refresh(); - posthog?.capture("upload profile picture"); + try { + posthog?.capture("upload profile picture"); + } catch (error) { + Sentry.captureException(error); + } }} />apps/web/src/components/user-dropdown.tsx (1)
Based on the codebase analysis, I can now provide a final response:
Consider using next-auth's signOut() instead of form submission for logout
The current form-based logout implementation can be replaced with next-auth's built-in signOut() function, which is more idiomatic and provides better integration with the authentication system. The codebase shows that the project is using next-auth with a comprehensive auth setup.
import { signOut } from "next-auth/react"; const useLogout = () => { return useCallback(() => { signOut({ callbackUrl: "/" }); }, []); };This approach:
- Integrates better with next-auth's session management
- Provides consistent behavior across different auth providers
- Handles cleanup of auth state automatically
- Eliminates the need for form submission and error handling
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
44-54: Consider the following improvements to enhance maintainability and error handling.
- Extract the logout logic into a custom hook for better reusability and testability
- Add error boundaries to handle potential rendering failures gracefully
- Consider tracking the Vercel production issue with Next.js auth
Here's how you could extract the logout logic:
const useLogout = () => { return useCallback(() => { const form = document.forms.namedItem("logout"); if (form && typeof form.submit === "function") { form.submit(); } else { console.error("Logout form or submit method not found"); } }, []); };Then in the component:
- function logout() { - const form = document.forms.namedItem("logout"); - if (form && typeof form.submit === "function") { - form.submit(); - } else { - console.error("Logout form or submit method not found"); - } - } export const UserDropdown = ({ className }: { className?: string }) => { + const logout = useLogout(); // ... rest of the componentLet's verify if there's an existing issue for the Vercel production auth problem:
Also applies to: 186-196
Let me verify if the logout logic is used elsewhere in the codebase to ensure the suggested refactoring won't cause issues.
Let me check if there are any existing hooks in the codebase and examine the auth implementation to ensure the refactoring suggestion aligns with the project's architecture.
Let me correct the command syntax and try again.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for related issues or comments about Vercel production auth issues gh issue list --search "vercel production next-auth" --json number,title,bodyLength of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar logout form submission patterns rg -U "document\.forms\.namedItem.*?submit" -A 2 # Look for existing custom hooks related to logout/auth fd "use.*\.(ts|tsx)$" --exec rg -l "logout|signOut"Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for auth-related hooks and implementations rg -l "useAuth|useUser|useSession" --type ts --type tsx # Check the auth configuration and setup fd "auth|session" --type ts --type tsx --exec cat {}Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for auth-related hooks and implementations rg -l "useAuth|useUser|useSession" # Check for auth configuration files fd -e ts -e tsx "auth|session" --exec cat {} # Look for Next.js auth configuration fd -g "*auth*" -g "*session*" --exec cat {}Length of output: 24714
apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (4)
Line range hint
24-33: Consider implementing the pending TODO for participant management.The TODO comment suggests moving participant-related functionality to a dedicated provider. This refactoring would improve code organization and separation of concerns.
Consider:
- Moving these methods to the participants provider:
- getParticipantsWhoVotedForOption
- getScore
- getParticipantById
- getVote
- Keeping only poll-specific logic in this context
Would you like me to help create a new GitHub issue to track this refactoring task?
Line range hint
89-93: Optimize participant lookup with an index.The TODO comment about building an index instead of using Array.find is valid. This would improve performance, especially with large numbers of participants.
Consider implementing this optimization:
- const getParticipantById = (participantId: string) => { - // TODO (Luke Vella) [2022-04-16]: Build an index instead - const participant = participants?.find(({ id }) => id === participantId); - return participant; - }; + // Build index once when participants change + const participantsIndex = React.useMemo( + () => keyBy(participants, 'id'), + [participants] + ); + const getParticipantById = (participantId: string) => { + return participantsIndex[participantId]; + };
Line range hint
196-251: Document complex time zone handling logic.The
createOptionsContextValuefunction contains complex time zone conversion logic that would benefit from detailed documentation explaining the different cases and why they're needed.Consider adding JSDoc comments:
+ /** + * Creates options context value with proper time zone handling + * @param pollOptions - Array of poll options with start time and duration + * @param targetTimeZone - The target time zone to convert times to + * @param sourceTimeZone - Original time zone of the poll (null for UTC) + * @returns Parsed options with correct time zone adjustments + */ function createOptionsContextValue( pollOptions: { id: string; startTime: Date; duration: number }[], targetTimeZone: string, sourceTimeZone: string | null, ): OptionsContextValue {
Line range hint
267-276: Optimize useEffect dependencies in OptionsProvider.The current dependency array includes
timeFormatwhich might not be necessary since it's not used in the options calculation. Also, consider memoizing the poll.options array to prevent unnecessary recalculations.Consider these optimizations:
const options = React.useMemo(() => { return createOptionsContextValue( poll.options, targetTimeZone, poll.timeZone, ); - // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps - }, [poll.options, poll.timeZone, targetTimeZone, timeFormat]); + }, [poll.options, poll.timeZone, targetTimeZone]);apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls.ts (1)
Line range hint
748-758: Track technical debt: Remove deprecatedclosedfieldThe TODO comment indicates that the
closedfield is being deprecated in favor of thestatusfield.Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the removal of the deprecated
closedfield?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (65)
apps/web/declarations/next-auth.d.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/events/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/polls/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/pro-badge.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/billing/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/preferences/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/delete-account-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-picture.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-settings.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/sidebar.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/auth/login/login-page.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/invite/[urlId]/invite-page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/invite/[urlId]/nav.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/new/loading.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/duplicate-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-details/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-settings/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/guest-poll-alert.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/api/logout/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/api/storage/[...key]/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/global-error.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/app/guest.ts(4 hunks)apps/web/src/app/providers.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/auth.ts(4 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/client/guest-provider.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/client/session-provider.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/client/user-provider.tsx(3 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/constants.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/edge.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/lib/create-guest-user.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/lib/parse-guest.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/next.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/auth/schema.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/add-to-calendar-button.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/create-poll.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/components/discussion/discussion.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/components/layouts/poll-layout.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/participant-dropdown.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/components/pay-wall-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll/participant-row.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/finalize-poll-dialog.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/mobile-poll.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/components/poll/notifications-toggle.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/components/user-dropdown.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/contexts/permissions.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/middleware.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/[locale]/auth/disable-notifications.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/_app.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/checkout.ts(3 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/portal.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts(2 hunks)apps/web/src/trpc/routers/auth.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls.ts(1 hunks)packages/posthog/package.json(1 hunks)packages/tsconfig/base.json(1 hunks)packages/utils/package.json(2 hunks)packages/utils/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/events/loading.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/loading.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/loading.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/api/logout/route.ts
- apps/web/src/app/api/storage/[...key]/route.ts
- apps/web/src/auth/constants.ts
- apps/web/src/components/pay-wall-dialog.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/poll/manage-poll/finalize-poll-dialog.tsx
- packages/utils/tsconfig.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)
- apps/web/package.json
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/delete-account-dialog.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/sidebar.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/auth/login/login-page.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/duplicate-dialog.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/providers.tsx
- apps/web/src/auth.ts
- apps/web/src/components/create-poll.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/discussion/discussion.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/participant-dropdown.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/poll/notifications-toggle.tsx
- apps/web/src/trpc/routers/auth.ts
- packages/posthog/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (62)
apps/web/src/auth/client/session-provider.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean imports and proper client-side setup.
The imports are well-organized with proper type definitions, and the "use client" directive is correctly placed.
packages/utils/package.json (1)
3-3: Verify the impact of ES modules migration.
Setting "type": "module" means all .js files will be treated as ES modules by default. This could potentially break existing CommonJS code.
Let's verify the codebase for potential CommonJS usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the utils package specifically to make a well-informed decision.
Setting type: "module" is safe to proceed
The change to ES modules in @rallly/utils package is safe because:
- The package only contains TypeScript files (
.ts) - It already uses ES module imports (e.g., in
nanoid.ts) - No CommonJS syntax (
require/module.exports) is used within the package - The only JavaScript files using CommonJS are configuration files in other packages (like
tailwind.config.js,next.config.js) which are not affected by this package's module type
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CommonJS require statements and module.exports
rg "(?:require\(|module\.exports)" -g '!{node_modules,dist}/**'
# Search for .js files that might need updating
fd -e js --exclude node_modules --exclude dist
Length of output: 3386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the source files in utils package
fd . "packages/utils/src" -t f
# Check if there are any .js files in utils that might be affected
fd -e js "packages/utils"
# Look for import statements in utils package to verify ES module usage
rg "import .* from" "packages/utils/src"
Length of output: 756
apps/web/src/auth/lib/parse-guest.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM!
The import statement is clean and correctly imports the required schema.
1-1: Verify schema implementation and usage.
Let's verify the schema implementation and its usage across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Schema implementation and usage verified successfully
The verification confirms:
userSchemais properly implemented inapps/web/src/auth/schema.tswith well-defined fieldsUsertype is correctly defined usingz.inferfrom the schema- Schema is consistently used with
safeParsein bothnext.tsandparse-guest.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify schema implementation and usage
# Check schema implementation
echo "Checking userSchema implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const userSchema = z.object({$$$})'
# Check User type usage
echo "Checking User type usage..."
rg -p "type User = z.infer<typeof userSchema>"
# Check consistent schema usage
echo "Checking schema usage..."
rg "userSchema\.safeParse"
Length of output: 1140
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/pro-badge.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM! Good organization of auth-related code.
The move of the user provider to a dedicated auth directory improves code organization and maintainability.
5-5: Verify consistent usage of the new import path.
Let's ensure this import path change is consistent across the codebase and the old import path is no longer in use.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change has been consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old import path
@/components/user-providerwere found - The new import path
@/auth/client/user-provideris consistently used across 15 files - Both
UserProvideranduseUserimports are correctly sourced from the new path
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old import path and verify consistent usage of the new path
echo "Checking for any remaining references to the old import path..."
rg "from \"@/components/user-provider\""
echo "Verifying usage of the new import path..."
rg "from \"@/auth/client/user-provider\""
Length of output: 1927
apps/web/src/auth/lib/create-guest-user.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and well-structured imports.
The imports are properly organized and use appropriate paths.
apps/web/src/auth/schema.ts (2)
12-12: LGTM! Type inference is properly implemented.
Using z.infer ensures perfect alignment between runtime validation and TypeScript types.
1-12: Verify schema usage across the application.
Let's ensure the schema is being used consistently for user validation throughout the application.
✅ Verification successful
Schema implementation and usage verified successfully
The schema is being used appropriately throughout the codebase:
- Proper validation in auth flows using
safeParsein bothnext.tsandparse-guest.ts - Consistent type usage in the layout component for guest and session handling
- Schema is correctly imported and used for user data validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of userSchema and User type across the codebase
echo "Checking userSchema usage:"
rg "userSchema\." -A 3
echo -e "\nChecking User type usage:"
rg "User[\[|\]|\s|;]" --type typescript
echo -e "\nChecking for potential user validation:"
rg "\.parse\(.*user" -A 2
Length of output: 841
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find User type usage and validation patterns
# Check for User type imports and usage
echo "Checking User type imports and usage:"
rg "import.*User.*from.*auth/schema"
rg "import.*\{.*User.*\}.*from.*auth/schema"
# Look for type annotations with User
echo -e "\nChecking User type annotations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = User'
ast-grep --pattern ': User'
# Check for any other user validation patterns
echo -e "\nChecking other validation patterns:"
rg "safeParse.*user" -A 2
rg "parse.*user" -A 2
# Look for files importing from auth/schema
echo -e "\nChecking schema imports:"
rg "import.*from.*auth/schema"
Length of output: 794
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for userSchema imports and related validation code
# Check for userSchema imports
echo "Checking userSchema imports:"
rg "import.*userSchema.*from.*auth/schema"
rg "import.*\{.*userSchema.*\}.*from.*auth/schema"
# Look for the actual validation implementations
echo -e "\nChecking validation implementations in auth files:"
cat apps/web/src/auth/next.ts
echo -e "\n---\n"
cat apps/web/src/auth/lib/parse-guest.ts
# Check layout.tsx implementation
echo -e "\nChecking layout implementation:"
cat apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx
Length of output: 3486
packages/tsconfig/base.json (2)
12-13: Consider the trade-offs of skipLibCheck.
While skipLibCheck: true improves build performance by skipping type checking of declaration files, it might mask type issues from dependencies. This is generally acceptable for most projects, but consider running occasional full type checks in CI to catch potential issues.
Let's check for potential type issues that might be masked:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for potential type-related issues in declaration files
# Search for declaration files with @ts-ignore or @ts-expect-error
rg "@ts-(ignore|expect-error)" --type-add 'dts:*.d.ts' --type dts
# Look for any TODO or FIXME comments in declaration files
rg "TODO|FIXME" --type-add 'dts:*.d.ts' --type dts6-7: LGTM! Modern module configuration aligned with Next.js requirements.
The module configuration is well-suited for a modern Next.js application, using ESNext modules with the Bundler resolution strategy.
Let's verify the module configuration compatibility:
apps/web/src/auth/client/guest-provider.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are minimal, properly separated between runtime and type imports, and follow good module organization practices.
7-7: LGTM! Well-typed context with appropriate visibility.
The context is properly typed to handle both user and no-user states, with a matching default value. Good practice keeping the context private and exposing it only through the hook.
apps/web/src/app/global-error.tsx (1)
7-11: LGTM! Improved function signature formatting.
The multi-line formatting enhances readability while maintaining the same functionality.
apps/web/src/auth/edge.ts (2)
1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports with clear separation.
The imports are properly organized, typed, and grouped logically between external and internal dependencies.
10-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding input validation and sanitization.
The function handles user data and cookies but lacks input validation. Consider:
- Validating the locale format
- Sanitizing user data before storing in cookies
- Adding rate limiting for guest user creation
Let's check if there's any existing rate limiting implementation:
apps/web/src/auth/next.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Well-structured imports with proper separation of concerns.
The imports are well-organized, properly typed, and demonstrate good separation of concerns by keeping constants and validation logic in separate modules.
25-31: Verify validation in safeParseGuestUser utility.
While the implementation is clean, we should verify the validation logic in the imported utility.
Consider adding explicit return type for better type safety:
-export async function getGuestUser() {
+export async function getGuestUser(): Promise<z.infer<typeof userSchema> | null> {✅ Verification successful
Validation in safeParseGuestUser is properly implemented
The utility function correctly implements validation using Zod schema:
- Uses
userSchema.safeParse()for type-safe parsing - Schema validates required fields: id, locale, createdAt
- Handles optional fields: timeZone, weekStart
- Returns null for invalid/malformed data
The suggested return type addition would indeed improve type safety:
-export async function getGuestUser() {
+export async function getGuestUser(): Promise<z.infer<typeof userSchema> | null> {🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the validation logic in safeParseGuestUser
# Check the implementation of safeParseGuestUser
echo "Checking safeParseGuestUser implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function safeParseGuestUser($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for schema usage in the parse function
echo "Verifying schema validation..."
rg -A 5 "safeParseGuestUser.*userSchema"
Length of output: 940
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the safeParseGuestUser implementation
# Search for the file containing safeParseGuestUser
echo "Finding files containing safeParseGuestUser..."
rg -l "safeParseGuestUser"
# Look for any parse functions related to user
echo "Looking for user parsing functions..."
rg -A 10 "function.*ParseGuestUser"
# Search for userSchema definition
echo "Looking for userSchema definition..."
rg -A 5 "userSchema.*=.*"
# Try to find imports of safeParseGuestUser in the file under review
echo "Checking imports in the file under review..."
rg -A 5 "import.*safeParseGuestUser" "apps/web/src/auth/next.ts"
Length of output: 1859
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/invite/[urlId]/nav.tsx (1)
7-7: Verify import path change across the codebase.
The import path for useUser has been updated. Let's verify this change is consistent across all files.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that all imports of useUser and UserProvider are consistently using the new path @/auth/client/user-provider. No instances of the old import path @/components/user-provider were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old imports of useUser
# and verify the new import path is used consistently
echo "Checking for old import path..."
rg "from \"@/components/user-provider\""
echo -e "\nVerifying new import path usage..."
rg "from \"@/auth/client/user-provider\""
Length of output: 1855
apps/web/declarations/next-auth.d.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM: DefaultJWT import added correctly
The addition of the DefaultJWT import is appropriate for extending the JWT interface.
Line range hint 14-19: Verify null checks for optional user property
Making the user property optional (user?) is a significant change that could affect type safety across the application. While this change allows for scenarios where the user object may not be present, it requires careful handling in the consuming code.
Let's verify that proper null checks are in place in components using the session:
Consider implementing a type guard or helper function to safely handle the optional user property across the application. Example:
export const isAuthenticated = (
session: Session | null,
): session is Session & { user: NonNullable<Session['user']> } => {
return Boolean(session?.user);
};✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the null checks implementation across the codebase.
This will help us verify if there are any instances where the session or user object is accessed without proper null checks, and how the useSession hook is being utilized throughout the codebase.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Optional user property is properly handled throughout the codebase
The codebase demonstrates consistent and safe handling of the optional user property:
- Optional chaining (
?.) is correctly used when accessing user properties (e.g.,session?.user?.id) - Null checks are implemented where required (e.g.,
if (!session || session.user?.email === null)) - The authentication state is properly verified (e.g.,
const isAuthenticated = !!session.data?.user?.email) - No instances of unsafe destructuring of the user property were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for useSession usage to verify null checks
rg -A 5 "useSession|getSession" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for direct user property access that might need null checks
ast-grep --pattern 'session.user'
Length of output: 1564
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for session usage patterns to verify null checks
rg -A 3 "session\?" --type ts
# Search for useSession hook usage with context
rg -A 5 "useSession" --type ts
# Look for potential direct user access without null checks
ast-grep --pattern 'const { user } = session'
Length of output: 5384
apps/web/src/contexts/permissions.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM! Verify Next.js module resolution.
The import path change aligns with the codebase's standardization efforts.
Let's verify the module resolution configuration:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module resolution configuration and existence
# Test 1: Check if the new path exists
fd --type f "user-provider\.(ts|tsx)$" "auth/client"
# Test 2: Check next.config.js for any path aliases
fd --type f "next.config\.(js|ts)$" | xargs cat3-3: Verify consistent usage of the new import path.
Let's ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command had syntax errors and didn't provide useful information. This new approach will help us:
- Find all imports of useUser to verify consistency
- Locate the user-provider file to confirm its new location
Import path is consistently used across the codebase
All instances of useUser imports are using the new path @/auth/client/user-provider or its relative equivalent. The file is correctly located at apps/web/src/auth/client/user-provider.tsx and there are no remaining references to the old import path.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify consistent usage
# Test 1: Check for any remaining old imports
rg "from ['\"']@/components/user-provider['\"]"
# Test 2: Verify usage of new import path
rg "from ['\"']@/auth/client/user-provider['\"]"
Length of output: 6192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the import paths
# Search for any imports of useUser
rg "import.*useUser.*from"
# Also check for the specific file existence and location
fd "user-provider\.(ts|tsx)$"
Length of output: 1752
apps/web/src/pages/[locale]/auth/disable-notifications.tsx (1)
Line range hint 28-31: Enhance token validation security.
The token validation could be strengthened by adding additional security checks.
Consider:
- Adding token expiration validation
- Implementing rate limiting for this endpoint
- Adding audit logging for notification preference changes
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/guest-poll-alert.tsx (2)
Line range hint 11-20: Clean and efficient conditional rendering logic.
The component's logic is well-structured with:
- Clear early returns that prevent unnecessary rendering
- Proper separation of concerns between poll and user state
- Efficient use of destructuring for accessing user data
6-6: Verify consistent usage of the new user provider import path.
The import path change from @/components/user-provider to @/auth/client/user-provider appears to be part of a broader refactoring effort.
Let's verify that this change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- No occurrences of the old import path
@/components/user-providerwere found - The new import path
@/auth/client/user-provideris consistently used across 15 files - Both the provider component (
UserProvider) and its hooks (useUser,IfGuest) are imported from the new location
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new import usage
# Test 1: Search for old import paths that might have been missed
rg "@/components/user-provider"
# Test 2: Verify usage of new import path
rg "@/auth/client/user-provider"
Length of output: 1679
apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/portal.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Improved null safety in user session check.
The additional optional chaining operator for the user object provides better protection against potential runtime errors.
Let's verify that similar null safety patterns are consistently applied across other files:
✅ Verification successful
Null safety patterns are consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that optional chaining is properly used throughout the codebase when accessing user session properties:
session?.user?.idin TRPC routersession?.user?.emailin auth checksuserSession?.user?.emailanduserSession?.user?.idin Stripe-related endpoints
The original review comment's approval is confirmed, as the change aligns with the established null safety patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potentially unsafe user session access patterns
# Expected: No direct access to user properties without optional chaining
# Search for userSession.user. patterns that might need optional chaining
rg "userSession\?\.user\.[a-zA-Z]+" --type ts
# Search for session?.user. patterns that might need optional chaining
rg "session\?\.user\.[a-zA-Z]+" --type ts
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's modify the search patterns to find both safe and potentially unsafe patterns
# This will help us understand the consistency of null safety usage
# Search for userSession access patterns
rg "userSession.*?\.user" --type ts -A 2
# Search for session access patterns
rg "session.*?\.user" --type ts -A 2
# Search specifically for email access patterns
rg "\.user\.email" --type ts -A 2
Length of output: 5866
apps/web/src/pages/api/trpc/[trpc].ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import changes improve modularity.
The migration from local PostHog handler to a package import and the addition of guest user handling functionality demonstrate good separation of concerns.
Also applies to: 7-8
34-40: Verify the impact of user object changes.
The user object structure has been updated with new fields. Let's verify that all consuming components handle these fields correctly.
✅ Verification successful
All user object properties are correctly handled across the codebase
The verification shows that all properties (id, isGuest, locale, image) from the user object are consistently used throughout the codebase:
- The properties are accessed in appropriate contexts:
isGuestfor conditional rendering and access controlidfor user identification and permissionslocalefor i18n and email client configurationimagefor avatar displays and profile management
The usage patterns are consistent and there are no signs of missing property handling or potential runtime errors. The changes to the user object structure are safe and well-integrated across the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components accessing user object properties
echo "Searching for components accessing user properties..."
rg -t typescript -t tsx "user\.(id|isGuest|locale|image)" --glob '!**/[trpc].ts'
# Search for direct destructuring of these properties
echo "Searching for destructuring patterns..."
rg -t typescript -t tsx "const.*\{.*(?:id|isGuest|locale|image).*\}.*=.*user"
Length of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components accessing user object properties using ripgrep without file type filters
echo "Searching for components accessing user properties..."
rg "user\.(id|isGuest|locale|image)" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts
# Search for direct destructuring of these properties
echo "Searching for destructuring patterns..."
rg "const.*\{.*(?:id|isGuest|locale|image).*\}.*=.*user" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts
# Use ast-grep to find object destructuring patterns
echo "Searching for object destructuring with ast-grep..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const { $$$1 } = user;'
# Search for components that might use these properties
echo "Searching for files importing or using the user object..."
rg "import.*user" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 23255
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-settings/page.tsx (1)
9-10: LGTM! Import changes look good.
The removal of the type keyword from the PollSettingsFormData import is a valid change, as TypeScript automatically treats type imports appropriately. The functionality remains unchanged.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized and necessary.
The new imports support PostHog analytics integration and enhanced session management capabilities.
Also applies to: 7-7, 9-9, 14-19
20-22: LGTM! Appropriate use of dynamic import for client-side analytics.
The dynamic import with ssr: false ensures PostHog tracking only runs on the client side, which is the correct approach.
apps/web/src/middleware.ts (2)
5-9: LGTM: Clean import organization
The new imports for guest user management are properly organized and consistently use path aliases.
40-43:
Consider error handling and response timing
The new guest user management logic introduces potential issues:
- Error Handling: The async operations lack try-catch blocks, which could lead to unhandled rejections affecting the middleware chain.
- Response Timing: Both functions modify the response object after it's created, which could lead to race conditions.
- Performance: Two sequential async operations in middleware could impact response time.
Consider implementing this safer approach:
- const res = NextResponse.rewrite(newUrl);
- // migrate guest user from next auth cookie to edge cookie
- await migrateGuestFromNextAuthCookie(req, res);
- // create guest user if not exists
- await initGuestUser(req, res);
-
- return res;
+ try {
+ // Handle guest user operations before creating response
+ const guestOps = await Promise.all([
+ migrateGuestFromNextAuthCookie(req),
+ initGuestUser(req)
+ ]);
+
+ // Create response after guest operations
+ const res = NextResponse.rewrite(newUrl);
+
+ // Apply any necessary cookie modifications from guest operations
+ guestOps.forEach(({ cookies }) => {
+ if (cookies) {
+ cookies.forEach(cookie => res.cookies.set(cookie));
+ }
+ });
+
+ return res;
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Guest user handling failed:', error);
+ // Fallback to basic response without guest user features
+ return NextResponse.rewrite(newUrl);
+ }Let's verify the guest user operations:
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/invite/[urlId]/invite-page.tsx (2)
Line range hint 58-71: LGTM! Well-structured component layout.
The InvitePage component maintains a clean and organized structure with appropriate spacing and responsive design classes.
5-5: Verify the new user provider import path.
The import path change appears to be part of a broader refactor to centralize user data management.
Let's verify the new import path and its interface:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is valid and consistent
The new import path @/auth/client/user-provider exists and exports the useUser hook with the expected interface. The file has been moved from the components directory to a more appropriate location under auth/client, maintaining the same functionality. The hook returns a user context and is used by components like IfAuthenticated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and interface of the new user provider
# Test 1: Check if the new file exists
fd "user-provider.tsx?" "apps/web/src/auth/client"
# Test 2: Compare the exported interfaces between old and new locations
rg -A 5 "export.*useUser" "apps/web/src/components/user-provider" "apps/web/src/auth/client/user-provider"
Length of output: 355
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of the new user provider file and check for useUser export
rg -A 10 "export.*useUser|function useUser" apps/web/src/auth/client/user-provider.tsx
# Let's also check if there are any other files still using the old import path
rg "@/components/user-provider" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 443
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/poll/[urlId]/edit-details/page.tsx (1)
16-17: LGTM! Clean separation of type and value imports.
The separation of type imports from value imports follows TypeScript best practices and improves code clarity.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-settings.tsx (1)
13-13: Verify consistent import path updates across the codebase.
Let's ensure all components have been updated to use the new import path.
✅ Verification successful
All imports of useUser are consistently using the new path
Based on the comprehensive search results, all files importing useUser are using the new path @/auth/client/user-provider. No instances of the old import path @/components/user-provider were found. The import path has been consistently updated across the entire codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new ones
echo "Checking for old import paths..."
rg "from.*@/components/user-provider.*useUser"
echo -e "\nVerifying new import paths..."
rg "from.*@/auth/client/user-provider.*useUser"
Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any useUser imports or references
echo "Searching for useUser imports and references..."
rg "useUser" -l
echo -e "\nChecking content of files with useUser..."
rg "useUser" -C 2
Length of output: 17283
apps/web/src/pages/_app.tsx (1)
33-33: LGTM! Improved null safety in authentication check.
The addition of optional chaining (?.) for the user object makes the authentication check more robust by preventing potential runtime errors when session.data.user is undefined.
Let's verify that this pattern is consistently applied across other authentication checks:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for actual usage patterns of session.data.user to verify the null safety implementation.
Let me try a different search pattern to find session data usage.
Optional chaining is consistently applied for session.data.user access
The codebase shows consistent and safe handling of session.data.user access:
- In
_app.tsx:session.data?.user?.email - In
user-provider.tsx:session.data?.user
The Session interface in next-auth.d.ts confirms that the user property is optional, making this null-safe approach correct. No unsafe access patterns were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential inconsistent session.data.user access patterns
# that might need similar null safety improvements
# Search for direct access to session.data.user without optional chaining
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'session\.data\.user[^?]'
# Search for useSession usage to cross-reference
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'useSession'
Length of output: 934
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for patterns accessing session.data.user with context
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' -B 2 -A 2 'session\.data\.user'
Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any session.data patterns with context
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' -B 2 -A 2 'session\.data'
# Also search for session type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Session {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1444
apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/checkout.ts (2)
40-40: LGTM!
The database query correctly uses the extracted userId variable while maintaining the same functionality.
91-96: Verify webhook handlers for metadata changes.
The metadata changes look good, but we should ensure that any webhook handlers properly handle these metadata fields.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about webhook handlers and metadata usage with different search patterns.
Let me check the content of the webhook handlers we found to understand how they process metadata.
Webhook handlers properly handle the userId metadata
The webhook implementation correctly processes the userId metadata for both checkout sessions and subscriptions:
- The
checkoutMetadataSchemaandsubscriptionMetadataSchemaboth validate the userId field - The checkout.session.completed handler uses userId to update user records
- The subscription event handlers (created/updated/deleted) parse and use userId for analytics
- A normalization script exists to ensure all subscriptions have userId in metadata
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check webhook handlers for metadata usage
# Expected: Find webhook handlers that process userId from metadata
# Look for Stripe webhook handlers
rg -l "stripe.*webhooks.*handler" --type ts
# Look for metadata usage in webhook handlers
rg "metadata\.userId" --type ts
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webhook-related files and their content
rg -l "webhook" --type ts
# Search for stripe event handling
rg "stripe.*event.*type" -A 5 --type ts
# Look for any metadata access patterns in typescript files
rg "\.metadata\." --type ts
# Search specifically for subscription-related handlers
rg "subscription.*event" --type ts
Length of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of webhook handlers
cat "apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/webhook.ts"
# Look for any userId handling in webhook file
rg "userId" "apps/web/src/pages/api/stripe/webhook.ts"
# Check the normalize subscription metadata script
cat "packages/billing/src/scripts/normalize-subscription-metadata.ts"
Length of output: 6567
apps/web/src/app/guest.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import changes are well-organized and necessary.
The new imports support the JWT handling and guest user functionality while maintaining a clear separation between external and internal dependencies.
Also applies to: 7-7, 9-10
35-35: LGTM: Consistent updates to function calls.
The updates correctly reflect the renamed getNextAuthCookieSettings function while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 93-93
Line range hint 14-22: Verify all usages of the renamed cookie settings function.
The rename from getCookieSettings to getNextAuthCookieSettings better reflects its purpose, but we should ensure all call sites are updated.
✅ Verification successful
Function rename is properly implemented across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The new function
getNextAuthCookieSettingsis only defined inapps/web/src/app/guest.ts - All usages of this function (3 occurrences) are in the same file and use the new name
- No instances of the old function name
getCookieSettingswere found - Other cookie-related matches are unrelated (cookie policy page)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old function name
# Expect: No matches for old name 'getCookieSettings'
rg "getCookieSettings" --type ts
Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for both old and new function names to understand the usage
# First, search for the new function name
echo "Searching for new function name (getNextAuthCookieSettings):"
rg "getNextAuthCookieSettings" -l --type ts
# Then search for any cookie-related settings functions to ensure we don't miss anything
echo -e "\nSearching for broader cookie settings patterns:"
rg "cookie.*settings" -i --type ts
# Also check for function declarations related to cookies using AST
echo -e "\nSearching for cookie-related function declarations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_(cookie$_|$_cookie)'
Length of output: 949
apps/web/next.config.js (1)
25-27: LGTM! Package transpilation configuration looks good.
The addition of these packages to transpilePackages follows the established pattern and is necessary for proper bundling in the Next.js build process.
apps/web/src/components/add-to-calendar-button.tsx (1)
12-13: LGTM! Clean separation of type imports.
The separation of type imports from value imports follows TypeScript best practices and improves code clarity.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-page.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.
The import statements are properly organized and the changes align with the component's requirements.
Also applies to: 13-13
Line range hint 20-119: LGTM! Well-structured component with clear user state handling.
The component effectively manages different user states, provides clear user feedback, and maintains proper security controls.
apps/web/src/auth/client/user-provider.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM! Clean dependency organization.
The new imports are well-organized and follow a clear separation between external dependencies and internal modules.
Also applies to: 8-8, 14-14
65-65: Verify PostHog initialization.
Ensure that PostHog is properly initialized before being used in this component.
✅ Verification successful
PostHog is properly initialized in the provider component
The PostHog initialization is correctly implemented in packages/posthog/src/client/provider.tsx. The provider:
- Initializes PostHog with the API key from environment variables
- Handles cases where the API key is not set
- Configures PostHog with appropriate settings including distinct ID
- Wraps children with the PostHog React provider
The usage of usePostHog in the user-provider is safe as long as it's wrapped with this PostHogProvider.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog initialization
echo "Checking PostHog initialization..."
rg -l "posthog.init"
# Check for other PostHog usage
echo "Checking other PostHog usage patterns..."
rg "usePostHog|posthog\." --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PostHog initialization with proper file type
echo "Checking PostHog initialization..."
rg -l "posthog.init"
# Check PostHog provider implementation
echo "Checking PostHog provider implementation..."
cat packages/posthog/src/client/provider.tsx
# Check for other PostHog usage with correct type specification
echo "Checking other PostHog usage patterns..."
rg "usePostHog|posthog\." -t ts -t tsx
Length of output: 1472
apps/web/src/components/poll/desktop-poll/participant-row.tsx (1)
9-9: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of the new import path.
The import path update aligns with the broader refactoring of user context management.
Let's verify that all other components have been updated to use the new import path:
✅ Verification successful
Import path migration is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No instances of the old import path
@/components/user-providerremain - The new import path
@/auth/client/user-provideris consistently used across all components - Both
useUserandUserProviderimports are properly updated
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and verify new ones
echo "Checking for old import paths..."
rg "from ['\"]@/components/user-provider['\"]"
echo "Verifying new import path usage..."
rg "from ['\"]@/auth/client/user-provider['\"]"
Length of output: 1875
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-picture.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM! Import changes and type validation look good.
The changes improve the codebase by:
- Using a dedicated PostHog package
- Adding proper MIME type validation using zod
Also applies to: 8-8, 16-16
Line range hint 117-141: LGTM! Clean implementation of avatar removal.
The component properly handles loading states and success callbacks.
Line range hint 178-190: LGTM! Clean implementation of the profile picture component.
The component properly handles conditional rendering and user context.
apps/web/src/components/layouts/poll-layout.tsx (2)
19-19: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.
Moving the user provider to a dedicated auth module improves code organization and separation of concerns.
19-19: Verify auth module reorganization impact.
Let's ensure all components have been updated to use the new auth module path consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence that:
- There are no remaining references to the old path
@/components/user-provider - The new path
@/auth/client/user-provideris consistently used across all components
Auth module reorganization verified successfully
All components have been updated to use the new auth module path @/auth/client/user-provider consistently, and no references to the old path remain in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old user-provider path
# and verify consistent usage of the new auth module
echo "Checking for any remaining references to the old user-provider path..."
rg -l "@/components/user-provider"
echo "Verifying consistent usage of the new auth module..."
rg -l "@/auth/client/user-provider"
Length of output: 1107
apps/web/src/components/user-dropdown.tsx (1)
37-41: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.
Moving user-related components to a dedicated auth directory improves code organization and follows separation of concerns.
apps/web/src/components/poll-context.tsx (1)
11-11: LGTM! Clean import organization.
The separation of type imports and function imports improves code organization and follows TypeScript best practices.
Also applies to: 13-13
apps/web/src/components/poll/mobile-poll.tsx (1)
28-28: LGTM! Verify import path consistency.
The import path change aligns with the centralization of user-related functionality under the auth module.
Let's verify the consistency of the new import path across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change verified and consistent
The import path change is part of a consistent pattern across the codebase. All imports of useUser and UserProvider are using the new path under auth/client/user-provider, with no remaining old import paths detected. The variations in relative paths (@/, ../, ../../) are normal and depend on the file location.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths and confirm consistent usage of the new path
# Test 1: Check for any remaining old imports (should return no results)
echo "Checking for old import paths..."
rg "from ['\"].*user-provider['\"]" --type tsx --type ts | grep -v "auth/client/user-provider"
# Test 2: Verify consistent usage of new import path
echo "Verifying new import path usage..."
rg "from ['\"].*auth/client/user-provider['\"]" --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 383
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep without file type filters
# and then post-process the results
# Check for any remaining old imports
echo "Checking for old import paths..."
rg "from ['\"].*user-provider['\"]" | grep -v "auth/client/user-provider"
# Verify consistent usage of new import path
echo "Verifying new import path usage..."
rg "from ['\"].*auth/client/user-provider['\"]"
Length of output: 2194
apps/web/src/trpc/routers/polls.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM! Import paths updated for better modularity
The changes to import paths reflect improved code organization:
- Server-specific PostHog import ensures proper separation of concerns
- Consistent usage of
@ralllynamespace for internal packages
Also applies to: 5-5
Line range hint 676-686: LGTM! Well-structured analytics implementation
The PostHog tracking captures relevant metrics for poll finalization:
- Poll ID for correlation
- Time zone information
- Participant statistics
- Time-to-finalize metric
Line range hint 516-534: LGTM! Comprehensive error handling
The error handling is well-structured with:
- Clear error messages
- Appropriate error codes
- Proper validation of required entities
| import { Spinner } from "@/components/spinner"; | ||
|
|
||
| export default function Loading() { | ||
| return null; | ||
| return <Spinner />; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Loading component in settings/profile needs to be consistent with other admin settings pages
I found that while most loading states use the Spinner component, there are inconsistencies in the styling within the admin settings section:
settings/profile/loading.tsxuses a basic<Spinner />without wrappersettings/preferences/loading.tsxuses a centered layout withh-72heightsettings/loading.tsxreturnsnull
For better UX consistency, the loading states in the admin settings section should follow the same pattern.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Good improvement to user experience.
The change from returning null to showing a loading indicator is a positive improvement that provides better visual feedback to users during loading states. The implementation is clean and follows Next.js best practices.
Let's verify if this pattern is consistently applied across other loading states:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other loading.tsx files in the admin section use the Spinner component
# Expected: All loading.tsx files should import and use the Spinner component
# Search for loading.tsx files in the admin section
rg -l --type tsx "export default function Loading" "apps/web/src/app/\[locale\]/\(admin\)"
# Check the implementation of these loading components
rg -A 5 "export default function Loading" "apps/web/src/app/\[locale\]/\(admin\)"
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using fd to find loading.tsx files and then examine their content
# First, find all loading.tsx files in the admin section
fd "loading\.tsx$" "apps/web/src/app"
# Then check their content
fd "loading\.tsx$" "apps/web/src/app" -x cat {}
Length of output: 2022
| "dependencies": { | ||
| "nanoid": "^4.0.0" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Consider upgrading nanoid to version 5.
The current version of nanoid (^4.0.0) has a known security vulnerability (CVE-2024-25613). Version 5.0.4 is available and addresses this issue.
Apply this diff to upgrade:
"dependencies": {
- "nanoid": "^4.0.0"
+ "nanoid": "^5.0.4"
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "dependencies": { | |
| "nanoid": "^4.0.0" | |
| }, | |
| "dependencies": { | |
| "nanoid": "^5.0.4" | |
| }, |
| export function safeParseGuestUser(serialized: string) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const res = userSchema.safeParse(JSON.parse(serialized)); | ||
| if (res.success) { | ||
| return res.data; | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| // TODO: Log error | ||
| } | ||
| return null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and type safety.
The function implementation is good but could benefit from the following improvements:
- Add explicit error logging with context
- Differentiate between parsing and validation errors
- Add explicit return type annotation
Consider applying these improvements:
-export function safeParseGuestUser(serialized: string) {
+export function safeParseGuestUser(serialized: string): User | null {
try {
- const res = userSchema.safeParse(JSON.parse(serialized));
+ const parsed = JSON.parse(serialized);
+ const res = userSchema.safeParse(parsed);
if (res.success) {
return res.data;
}
+ console.error('Guest user validation failed:', res.error);
} catch (error) {
- // TODO: Log error
+ console.error('Failed to parse guest user:', {
+ error,
+ serialized: serialized.slice(0, 100), // Log truncated input for debugging
+ });
}
return null;
}The changes:
- Add explicit return type for better type safety
- Separate JSON parsing from schema validation
- Add proper error logging with context
- Remove the TODO comment
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function safeParseGuestUser(serialized: string) { | |
| try { | |
| const res = userSchema.safeParse(JSON.parse(serialized)); | |
| if (res.success) { | |
| return res.data; | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| // TODO: Log error | |
| } | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| export function safeParseGuestUser(serialized: string): User | null { | |
| try { | |
| const parsed = JSON.parse(serialized); | |
| const res = userSchema.safeParse(parsed); | |
| if (res.success) { | |
| return res.data; | |
| } | |
| console.error('Guest user validation failed:', res.error); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to parse guest user:', { | |
| error, | |
| serialized: serialized.slice(0, 100), // Log truncated input for debugging | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| return null; | |
| } |
| export async function createGuestUser(initialData: Partial<User>) { | ||
| const user: User = { | ||
| id: initialData.id ?? `user-${randomid()}`, | ||
| createdAt: new Date().toISOString(), | ||
| locale: initialData.locale ?? "en", | ||
| }; | ||
| return user; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary async keyword.
The function doesn't contain any asynchronous operations, so the async keyword is not needed.
-export async function createGuestUser(initialData: Partial<User>) {
+export function createGuestUser(initialData: Partial<User>) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export async function createGuestUser(initialData: Partial<User>) { | |
| const user: User = { | |
| id: initialData.id ?? `user-${randomid()}`, | |
| createdAt: new Date().toISOString(), | |
| locale: initialData.locale ?? "en", | |
| }; | |
| return user; | |
| } | |
| export function createGuestUser(initialData: Partial<User>) { | |
| const user: User = { | |
| id: initialData.id ?? `user-${randomid()}`, | |
| createdAt: new Date().toISOString(), | |
| locale: initialData.locale ?? "en", | |
| }; | |
| return user; | |
| } |
| export const userSchema = z.object({ | ||
| id: z.string(), | ||
| locale: z.string(), | ||
| createdAt: z.string(), | ||
| timeZone: z.string().optional().catch(undefined), | ||
| weekStart: z.number().optional().catch(undefined), | ||
| timeFormat: z.enum(["hours12", "hours24"]).optional().catch(undefined), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance schema validation for better type safety and error handling.
The current schema could benefit from stronger validation rules:
export const userSchema = z.object({
- id: z.string(),
- locale: z.string(),
- createdAt: z.string(),
- timeZone: z.string().optional().catch(undefined),
- weekStart: z.number().optional().catch(undefined),
+ id: z.string().uuid(),
+ locale: z.string().regex(/^[a-z]{2}-[A-Z]{2}$/),
+ createdAt: z.string().datetime().transform((str) => new Date(str)),
+ timeZone: z.string()
+ .refine((tz) => Intl.supportedValuesOf('timeZone').includes(tz),
+ "Invalid timezone")
+ .optional(),
+ weekStart: z.number()
+ .min(0)
+ .max(6)
+ .optional(),
timeFormat: z.enum(["hours12", "hours24"]).optional().catch(undefined),
});Consider:
- Using
.uuid()for id validation - Adding locale format validation
- Converting createdAt to Date
- Validating timeZone against IANA timezone database
- Adding range validation for weekStart (0-6 for Sunday-Saturday)
- Removing
.catch(undefined)to prevent silently ignoring validation errors
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const guestUser = await getGuestUserFromApiRequest(opts.req); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for guest user retrieval.
The guest user retrieval should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully.
- const guestUser = await getGuestUserFromApiRequest(opts.req);
+ let guestUser;
+ try {
+ guestUser = await getGuestUserFromApiRequest(opts.req);
+ } catch (error) {
+ Sentry.captureException(error);
+ guestUser = null;
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <SessionProvider session={session}> | ||
| <GuestProvider user={guestUser}> | ||
| <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id ?? guestUser?.id}> | ||
| <PostHogPageView /> | ||
| <Providers> | ||
| {children} | ||
| <TimeZoneChangeDetector /> | ||
| </Providers> | ||
| </PostHogProvider> | ||
| </GuestProvider> | ||
| </SessionProvider> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding type safety and anonymous user tracking.
While the provider hierarchy is correct, the PostHog implementation could be enhanced:
- <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id ?? guestUser?.id}>
+ <PostHogProvider
+ distinctId={
+ session?.user?.id ??
+ guestUser?.id ??
+ // Fallback for completely anonymous users
+ `anon_${crypto.randomUUID()}`
+ }
+ // Consider adding user properties for better analytics
+ person={{
+ type: session?.user ? 'authenticated' : guestUser ? 'guest' : 'anonymous',
+ locale,
+ }}
+ >📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <SessionProvider session={session}> | |
| <GuestProvider user={guestUser}> | |
| <PostHogProvider distinctId={session?.user?.id ?? guestUser?.id}> | |
| <PostHogPageView /> | |
| <Providers> | |
| {children} | |
| <TimeZoneChangeDetector /> | |
| </Providers> | |
| </PostHogProvider> | |
| </GuestProvider> | |
| </SessionProvider> | |
| <SessionProvider session={session}> | |
| <GuestProvider user={guestUser}> | |
| <PostHogProvider | |
| distinctId={ | |
| session?.user?.id ?? | |
| guestUser?.id ?? | |
| // Fallback for completely anonymous users | |
| `anon_${crypto.randomUUID()}` | |
| } | |
| // Consider adding user properties for better analytics | |
| person={{ | |
| type: session?.user ? 'authenticated' : guestUser ? 'guest' : 'anonymous', | |
| locale, | |
| }} | |
| > | |
| <PostHogPageView /> | |
| <Providers> | |
| {children} | |
| <TimeZoneChangeDetector /> | |
| </Providers> | |
| </PostHogProvider> | |
| </GuestProvider> | |
| </SessionProvider> |
apps/web/next.config.js
Outdated
| "@rallly/posthog", | ||
| "@rallly/guest-user", | ||
| "@rallly/emails", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing dependency in package.json
While @rallly/guest-user exists in the workspace at packages/guest-user/, it's not listed as a dependency in apps/web/package.json. This needs to be added to ensure proper package resolution.
- Add
@rallly/guest-userto the dependencies inapps/web/package.json
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify package dependencies.
Let's ensure these newly added packages exist and are properly referenced in the workspace.
All package dependencies are correctly configured and present in the workspace
The verification confirms:
- All three packages (
@rallly/posthog,@rallly/guest-user,@rallly/emails) exist in the workspace underpackages/ - Two of them (
@rallly/posthog,@rallly/emails) are properly listed as dependencies inapps/web/package.json
Let me verify the missing @rallly/guest-user dependency:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the packages exist in the workspace and are listed as dependencies
# Test 1: Check if packages exist in workspace
echo "Checking for package existence in workspace..."
for pkg in "posthog" "guest-user" "emails"; do
fd -t d "^${pkg}$" packages/ && echo "✓ Found @rallly/${pkg}"
done
# Test 2: Verify dependencies in package.json
echo -e "\nChecking package.json dependencies..."
jq -r '.dependencies | keys[] | select(startswith("@rallly/"))' apps/web/package.json
Length of output: 855
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if guest-user is listed in package.json with a different format
cat apps/web/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "guest-user"
Length of output: 55
| React.useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (user) { | ||
| posthog?.identify(user.id, { | ||
| email: user.email, | ||
| name: user.name, | ||
| tier, | ||
| timeZone: user.timeZone ?? null, | ||
| image: user.image ?? null, | ||
| locale: user.locale ?? i18n.language, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | ||
| }, [user?.id]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential race condition in PostHog identification.
The effect hook might cause race conditions if user properties change rapidly, and the eslint-disable comment lacks explanation.
- Add debouncing to prevent rapid PostHog calls:
+ const debouncedIdentify = React.useCallback(
+ debounce((userData: typeof user) => {
+ if (userData) {
+ posthog?.identify(userData.id, {
+ email: userData.email,
+ name: userData.name,
+ tier,
+ timeZone: userData.timeZone ?? null,
+ image: userData.image ?? null,
+ locale: userData.locale ?? i18n.language,
+ });
+ }
+ }, 1000),
+ [posthog, tier, i18n.language]
+ );
React.useEffect(() => {
- if (user) {
- posthog?.identify(user.id, {
- email: user.email,
- name: user.name,
- tier,
- timeZone: user.timeZone ?? null,
- image: user.image ?? null,
- locale: user.locale ?? i18n.language,
- });
- }
- // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
+ debouncedIdentify(user);
+ // Disabled exhaustive-deps as we only want to trigger on user.id changes
+ // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [user?.id]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| if (user) { | |
| posthog?.identify(user.id, { | |
| email: user.email, | |
| name: user.name, | |
| tier, | |
| timeZone: user.timeZone ?? null, | |
| image: user.image ?? null, | |
| locale: user.locale ?? i18n.language, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | |
| }, [user?.id]); | |
| const debouncedIdentify = React.useCallback( | |
| debounce((userData: typeof user) => { | |
| if (userData) { | |
| posthog?.identify(userData.id, { | |
| email: userData.email, | |
| name: userData.name, | |
| tier, | |
| timeZone: userData.timeZone ?? null, | |
| image: userData.image ?? null, | |
| locale: userData.locale ?? i18n.language, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| }, 1000), | |
| [posthog, tier, i18n.language] | |
| ); | |
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| debouncedIdentify(user); | |
| // Disabled exhaustive-deps as we only want to trigger on user.id changes | |
| // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps | |
| }, [user?.id]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/src/app/guest.ts (1)
52-84: Consider further improvements to error handling and type safety.While the current implementation includes basic error handling, there's room for improvement:
Consider this enhanced version:
export async function migrateGuestFromNextAuthCookie( req: NextRequest, res: NextResponse, ) { const { name } = getNextAuthCookieSettings(); const token = req.cookies.get(name)?.value; if (!token) return; try { const jwt = await decode({ token, secret: process.env.SECRET_PASSWORD, }); - if (jwt?.sub && jwt?.locale) { + if (!jwt?.sub || !jwt?.locale) { + console.warn('Invalid JWT payload:', jwt); + return; + } const user = await createGuestUser({ id: jwt.sub, locale: jwt.locale, timeZone: jwt.timeZone ?? undefined, weekStart: jwt.weekStart ?? undefined, timeFormat: jwt.timeFormat ?? undefined, }); res.cookies.set(GUEST_USER_COOKIE, JSON.stringify(user)); } catch (error) { - console.error("Failed to decode JWT:", error); + if (error instanceof Error) { + console.error("Failed to decode JWT:", error.message); + } res.cookies.delete(name); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/web/src/app/guest.ts(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/web/next.config.js
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/src/app/guest.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized.
The new imports are properly structured and necessary for the added functionality.
Also applies to: 7-7, 9-10
Line range hint 14-22: LGTM: Improved function naming.
The rename to getNextAuthCookieSettings better describes the function's purpose and scope.
35-35: LGTM: Consistent usage of cookie settings.
The updates properly integrate the renamed getNextAuthCookieSettings function while maintaining the existing functionality.
Also applies to: 100-100
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PostHogintegration for improved analytics tracking.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores